CC RES 2003-067RESOLUTION NO. 2003-67
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS
VERDES, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE
WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND
ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089.
WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ( "MTA "),
acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, adopted the
2002 Congestion Management Program in June 2002; and
WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires that MTA annually determine that the County
and cities within the County are conforming to all CMP requirements; and
WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires submittal to the MTA of the CMP local
implementation report by September 1 of each year; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a noticed public hearing on August 19, 2003, at
which time all interested parties were allowed to attend and give testimony.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS
VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the City of Rancho Palos Verdes ( "City ") has taken all of the
following actions, and that the City is in conformance with all applicable requirements of
the 2002 CMP.
By June 15, of odd - numbered years, the City will conduct annual traffic counts and
calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections, consistent with the
requirements identified in the CMP Highway and Roadway System Chapter.
The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a transportation demand
management ordinance, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the
CMP Transportation Demand Management Chapter.
The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis
program, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land Use
Analysis Program Chapter.
The City has adopted the 2003 Local Implementation Report, attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof, consistent with the requirements identified in the
CMP. This report balances traffic congestion impacts due to growth within the City with
transportation improvements, and demonstrates that the City is meeting its
responsibilities under the Countywide Deficiency Plan.
SECTION 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and
shall forward a copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day o u t, 2003.
40)
Mayor
Attest:
tit/ City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES )
I, Jo Purcell, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, do hereby certify that the
above Resolution No. 2003 -67 was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said
City Council at a regular meeting held on August 19, 2003.
City Clerk
Resolution No. 2003 -67
Page 2of2
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Date Prepared: 27-Aug-03
2003 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2002 - MAY 31, 2003
Contact: Beilin Yu,Assistant Planner
Phone Number: (310)544-5228
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY
2003 DEFICIENCY PLAN STATUS SUMMARY
1. Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal
[from Section I] ......... ......... (403)
Exempted Dwelling Units 0
Exempted Non-residential sq.ft. (in 1,000s) Q
2. Transportation Improvements Credit Claims
[from Section II] 2,184
Land Use Strategy Claims 0
Capital Improvement Claims 1
Transit Claims 1
TDM Claims 0
Total Strategies Claimed 2
Subtotal Current Credit(Goal) 1,780
3. Carryover Credit from Last Year's(2001)
Local Implementation Report ... 11,826
Net Deficiency Plan Credit Balance: ... 13,606
Resolution No. 2003-67
Exhibit A
Page 1 of 6
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Date Prepared: 27-Aug-03
2003 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2002 - MAY 31, 2003
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT
'ART I: NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category Dwelling ' Debit Debits
Units Value/DU
Single Family Residential 6.00 x 6.80 = 41
Multi-Family Residential 0.00 x 4.76 = 0
Grou• Quarters 0.00 x 1.98 = 0
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category 1000 Gross Debit Debits
Square Feet Value/1000SF
Commercial(less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 22.23 = 0
Commercial(300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 x 17.80 = 0 '
Freestanding Eating& Drinking 0.00 x 66.99 = 0
NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category 1000 Gross Debit Debits
Square Feet Value/1000SF
Lodging _ 0.00 x 7.21 = 0
Industrial 59.65 x 6.08 = 363
Office(less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 16.16 = 0
Office(50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 10.50 = 0
Office(300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 x 7.35 = 0
Medical 0.00 x 16.90 = 0
Government 0.00 x 20.95 = 0
Institutional/Educational 0.00 x 7.68 = 0
University(#of students) 0.00 x 1.66 = 0
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Description Daily Trips Debit Debits
(Attach additional sheets if necessary) (Enter"0" if none) Value/Trip
ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 x 0.71 = 0
ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 x 0.71 = 0
Subtotal New Development Activity = 403
Adjustments(Optional)-Complete Part 2 - 0
Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal (Points) = (403)
Resolution No. 2003-67
Exhibit A
Page 2 of 6
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Date Prepared: 27-Aug-03
2003 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2002 - MAY 31, 2003
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued)
Enter information where it sa s"Enter." If not ap•licable, enter"0"so it will total.
PART 2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed only for 1)development permits that were both issued and
revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period, and 2)demolition of any structure within the
reporting period.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category Dwelling Adjustment Subtotal
Units Value/DU
Single Family Residential 0.00 x 6.80 = 0
Multi-Famil Residential 0.00 x 4.76 = 0
Group Quarters 0.00 x 1.98 = 0
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category 1000 Gross Adjustment Subtotal
Square Feet Value/1000SF
Commercial(less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 22.23 = Q
Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 x 17.80 = 0
Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.00 x 66.99 - 0
NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category 1000 Gross Adjustment Subtotal
Square Feet Value/1000SF
Lodging 0.00 x 7.21 = 0
Industrial 0.00 x 6.08 = 0
Office(less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 16.16 = 0
Office(50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 10.50 = 0
Office(300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 x 7.35 = 0
Medical _ 0.00 x 16.90 = 0
Government . 0.00 x 20.95 = 0
Institutional/Educational 0.00 x 7.68 = 0
University(#of students) 0.00 x 1.66 = 0
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Description Daily Trips I Adjustment Subtotal
Attach additional sheets if necessa (Enter"0"if None Value/Tri•
ENTER HERE IF APPLICABLE 0.00 x 0.71 = 0
ENTER HERE IF APPLICABLE 0.00 x 0.71 = 0
Total Mitigation Goal Adjustments (Points) = 0
Resolution No. 2003-67
Exhibit A
Page 3 of 6
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Date Prepared: 27-Aug-03
2003 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2002 - MAY 31, 2003
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued)
PART 3: EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
(NOT INCLUDED IN NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TOTALS)
LowNery Low Income Housing ( 01 Dwelling Units
High Density Residential 01 Dwelling Units
near Rail Stations
Mixed Use Developments 0 1000 Gross Square Feet
near Rail Stations 0 Dwelling Units
Development Agreements entered 0 1000 Gross Square Feet
into Prior to July 10, 1989 0 Dwelling Units
Reconstruction of Buildings 0 1000 Gross Square Feet
damaged in April 1992 Civil Unrest 0 Dwelling Units
Reconstruction of Buildings 0 1000 Gross Square Feet
damaged in Jan 1994 Earthquake 0 Dwelling Units
Total Dwelling Units 0
Total Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s) p
Exempted Development Definitions:
1. LowNery Low Income Housing: as defined by the California Department of Housing and Community
Development as follows:
Low-Income: equal to or less than 80% of the County median income,with adjustments for family size.
Very Low-Income: equal to or less than 50%of the County median income,with adjustments for family si
2. High Density Residential Near Rail Stations: development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenge
station and that is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential density allowed under
the local general plan and zoning ordinance. A project providing a minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre
is automatically considered high density.
3. Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations: mixed use development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger
station, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development is used for high
density residential housing.
4. Development Agreements: projects that entered into a development agreement(as specified under Secti
65864 of the California Government Code)with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989.
5. Reconstruction or replacement of any residential or non-residential structure which is damaged or destroy
to the extent of not less than 50% of its reasonable value, by fire, flood, earthquake or other similar calarr
6. Any project of a federal, state or county agency that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning regulations a
where the local jurisdiction is precluded from exercising any approval/disapproval authority. These locally
precluded projects do not have to be reported in the LIR.
Resolution No. 2003-67
Exhibit A
Page 4 of 6
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Date Prepared: 27-Aug-03
2003 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2002 - MAY 31, 2003
SECTION II.b - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CREDIT CLAIMS
Total Cap. Imp. Projects: 1 Total Cap. Imp. Credit (Points: 2,117
r v:::r r:r r.j �
r 1.•••r•r✓•✓.:r••.•✓•.�r••• :•:•:i.'y:b•}}}.•:r✓: :•:•f:':•:✓lJ✓J✓l✓Pr:•:•:•JJ.J{{{✓rrt•N{J✓1{rJ1{!{.YJ.; •..y{JlJ{JX{J{f�JJ! ✓.
..r.... .,•!. •r✓!!.••r..r...•rJ.✓...rrr.•}:•'r.•:•Y.•:•:rr}'r�r�.•:•}},}:•.{•}•:•:r•:
•.' !• .Y lNr.•.•.Y.•r.•✓JJrrr.•✓✓rrN.•J•.•✓.•J. •Y•{•}:✓r✓�.•.:Vr.:'J✓r.Yrr✓r•J.••J.!.J.J..r•.1�{.�{.✓{.}�r.�r.{.{�✓..•.J{.{�l.;JrJ{4'!{J;J{.�f•.
rr.•rtl�!J.•••.•.•rr}J:".r✓.•Y.•.•.•Jrt•r J.•.•••.'••✓.r•lr..N{. r••✓r!✓rrr••!r.•✓J✓✓✓J'.•.•.•.r...r•..J.✓.•✓r.•!J✓•S•.. {• .•!}.r•.!.J.'.J..rlr.•!r..rJ.r...}r.•.f.1.
..... .••J.J.'.•.•1✓!r✓.•rr.:•.•✓.•✓.•.•..•J.•}✓.•✓r.•'.•r.•.•r.•.•✓✓.•✓✓rr✓.4•}.•r{ •.
•,••••.••J.•.•••.•.•J••!r✓••••.•✓.•r✓�t.•••••.•.•••✓✓r.....•J.•.. .'. •}✓Jrr✓.•✓lrrlJ✓.•.•✓✓r.•.•r.Vlr.•.•r.%•.•••.•✓r••r.•.•r Jr{{{{{!{{{{{{{{.;.;.;{{.❖.•J.•✓.h. •l✓rr.•J.:•.•}1 r.rrJ.•rJ.•rJ✓A•r
�.;✓{{.•J.•. .• •Y.•.•r✓L•.•r1.••r rJA•rl•rrJJ.•.•••✓rJ..lrr.•Jr✓✓.•rJ.•✓.S•N!r::r.•,.Y{r{{{.•{A�.•rr.,•
•r..r.JJJ.r.•.YJ••Jr.•.••✓lJJf.•r.•.•rr.•J✓•.•.•rrrr!.•rrJr.. f J.!.!.Jr.'.rV.•.M1•J.•J✓r✓l.Y.V✓J✓••.:•.•✓✓•:•r✓•.•J.�••{✓�;rr•�.;r..✓✓r J.r....•....r....}..:••r:.•.;.•r,.;r•r•.,••r r {
f ✓J✓rrr.•J.•• :•r.•.i•:✓rlrJ✓✓.: '.•�✓• YJrr✓✓!r✓rr✓✓}✓.•.•••✓}.Y✓✓r✓✓.•.•✓.•!.:•✓✓A}•{{{r✓✓{.V{{{rL;{{. .4{•rr:•. •• f f
}:�'.•❖!••.•.•!.•:✓lrrJ'}.•.•J.•. •••J•r1.•:✓T•}••r.Y✓}1••rr••Jr.•!✓.•r✓.•!.•. •.•J!!.'.•AY.•llJrrr:'.J...JrJ.rJ...r.. •:•}:. •.•J.•. :•J.:VJrrA•rl.•••••Jrr✓rN••r..�✓!.•.1...!..!!•..Jl.rr✓!.J!!.✓!✓J!•..r...r.J..h.• !J.•rlrtJ✓!rt•.• !N.'••J••!fJ}
1 2 3 Signal synchronization on 4-lane Other Major Arterial 5.Scope 6.Units
1 241.5 4 Hawthorne Blvd and Vallon Drive 1A route-mile
7. Str. Name: Hawthorne Blvd.
8. From/To: DupreDrive ;.
9. Intersection: Vallon Drive I 10. Map Page: 822
11. Participants: City of Rancho Palos Verdes
12. MTA Funding: 0% 13. Your share of local funding: 100%
14. Portion of Project within your jurisdiction: 100%
15. Other Info: Enter
16 I 17 1 18 I 19 I 20 I 21 I 22 I 23 I 24
1470.001 2,117 I 2003 I Enter I 100%1 3 I 0 I 100% I 2;117
Resolution No. 2003-67
Exhibit A
Page 5 of 6
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Date Prepared:
2003 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2002 - MAY 31, 2003
SECTION II.d - TRANSIT CREDIT CLAIMS
Total Transit Projects: .l Total Transit Credit (Points): 67
VEMBEEMERSEMINESSENEMENNENSISSISSOMMEMISIMENSERSO
1 2 3 New
or Commuter Bus Service 5.Scope: 6. Units:
1 I 361.00 I - Palos Verdes Fixed Transit 67 PMT
111111181111MINKNORMIN
y:•.:•r.::•r::•r.•rJ:•r:{•::•:�.:•:{•:{:{•M,:;:;:;., :!{
1
:, r::•r••✓:.f:••'f{ 7 Expres 8. Local 9.Shuttle 10. DialaRide Total Credits
intexiscREemareastama r••rr:•Jrrrr:{.•:v.•.
Increase in Avg Weekday Ridership
Over last reported rideship: 0 75 0 3
Credit Factor(avg. miles per rider): 7.7 3.3 1.0 4.5
Avg. Daily PMT:1. 0 _ 248 1 0 I 13 ' 261
11. First Year of Service: 0
12. Milestone Reached: 0 .::::::EiiikValtia::(Z):::1101::
� ll: iu tot tr€e
13. Milestone Percent Factor. 04 In 9 •
14.Annual Operating Cost. 415,113
15. Percent Funded Locally. 26% :.::.. .......:................•- ::::
rail feeder service: 0 16. I f commuter r
17. If urban rail feederservice: 0 ............
18. Prior credits for rail boardings: 0
19.Prior credits for this service: 515 20. Net 2001 Credit Value: 67
Resolution No. 2003-67
Exhibit A
Page 6 of 6