Loading...
CC RES 2004-100RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES DENYING AN APPEAL, THEREBY UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN REVIEW (CASE NO. ZON2003- 00280), FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5 ROCKINGHORSE ROAD. WHEREAS, on May 29, 2003 the applicant submitted an application for a Site Plan Review (Case No. ZON2003- 00280) requesting to construct 3,174 square feet of first -story additions to the existing 2,423 square foot residence located at 5 Rockinghorse Road. On June 25, 2004, staff completed the initial review of the proposed plans, at which time the application was deemed incomplete due to missing information on the project plans and /or applications. The applicant submitted the additional information to the City on February 12, 2004; and,. WHEREAS, the Site Plan Review application was deemed complete by staff on February 26, 2004; and, WHEREAS, on March 4, 2004 the required public notice was mailed to property owners within a 500' foot radius of the subject property and the required notice was published in the Peninsula News on March 6, 2004; and, WHEREAS, on April 26, 2004 the Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement conditionally approved the requested application, and a Notice of Decision was prepared and distributed to all interested parties; and, WHEREAS, on May 12, 2004, within fifteen (15) days following the Director's Notice of Decision, Ms. Rose Marie DiSanto, from 13 Cayuse Lane submitted an appeal letter and the associated fee to appeal the Planning Director's decision to the Planning Commission based upon the belief that the City should not have granted the approval of the additions on a property containing fences in the roadway easement located to the front of the subject property; and, WHEREAS, after notice issued pursuant to the requirements of the Rancho Palos Verdes Development Code, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on July 27, 2004, at which time all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard and present evidence. WHEREAS, on July 27, 2004, after taking public testimony, the Planning Commission denied the appeal, and approved the requested Site Plan Review, with one additional condition of approval; and, WHEREAS, on August 11, 2004, within fifteen (15) days following the Planning Commission's Notice of Decision, Sunshine, from 6. Limetree Lane, filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission's decision, requesting that the City Council reconsider the Planning Commission's approval of the Site Plan Review; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et. seq. ( "CEQA "), the State's CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulation, Title 14, Section 15000 et. seq., the City's Local CEQA Guidelines, and Government Code Section 65962.5(f) (Hazardous Waste and Substances Statement), Staff found no evidence that Case No. ZON2003 -00280 would have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project has been found to be categorically exempt under Class 1 (Section 15303) since the site is developed with a single - family residence and the proposed project consists of a minor alteration to the existing structure on the subject property, with no significant additional site disturbance; and, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY CONCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The City Council upholds the Planning Commission's conditional approval of Site Plan Review (Case No. ZON2003- 00280), and finds as follows: a) That the proposed additions comply with the RS -2 Residential Development Standards in terms of setback, lot coverage, and height requirements. b) The proposed structure's scale is compatible with the scale of surrounding properties, in that it will be within the range of the structure sizes found within the twenty (20) closest properties, in that the apparent bulk and mass will be compatible since the structure will remain a single story structure and the flat front facade is a design found in the surrounding residences. c) The proposed structure's architectural style will be compatible with the architectural style of the surrounding residences in that the proposed residence will maintain a hip - pitched roof with clay -tile roofing materials, wood siding and brick details and these are materials that are common in the neighborhood. d) The proposed structure's front, side and rear yard setback will be compatible with the setbacks found in the surrounding properties since most homes in the immediate neighborhood are smaller than the proposed residence, the neighboring lots are comparable in size to the subject property, and the proposed project will maintain the required setbacks for lots created after the City's incorporation, which is larger than other lots in the immediate neighborhood. Resolution No. 2004 -100 Page 2of3 Section 2: The time within which the judicial review of the decision reflected in this Resolution, if available, must be sought is governed by Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure and other applicable short periods of limitation. Section 3: For the foregoing reasons, and based on the information and findings included in the Staff Report, Minutes and other records of proceedings (dated April 20, 2004, July 27, 2004, and November 26, 2004), the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes hereby denies the appeal, thereby upholding the Planning Commission's conditional approval of the Site Plan Review Case No. ZON2003 -00280 to allow the construction of 3,174 square feet of first -story additions to the existing 2,423 square foot residence; subject to the conditions of approval contained in Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and made a part hereof, which are necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare in the area. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of November Attest: City INerk State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) ss City of Rancho Palos Verdes ) 04. I, JO PURCELL, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, hereby certify that the above Resolution No. 2004 -100 was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on November 16, 2004. Q sat 110 Clerk Resolution No. 2004 -100 Page 3 of 3 Resolution No. 2004 -100 - Exhibit "A" Conditions of Approval Site Plan Review Case No. ZON2003 -00280 1. The applicant/property owner shall submit to the City a statement, in writing that they have read, understand and agree to all conditions of approval listed below. Failure to provide said written statement within ninety (90) days of the effective date of approval shall render this approval null and void. 2. The approval shall become null and void after 180 days from the date of approval unless the approved plans are submitted to the Building and Safety Division to initiate the "plan check" review process, pursuant to Section 17.86.070 of the City's Development Code. This approval shall become null and void if, after initiating the "plan check" review process, or receiving a building permit to begin construction, said "plan check" or permit is allowed to expire or is withdrawn by the applicant. 3. The Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement is authorized to make minor modifications to the approved preliminary plans or any of the conditions if such modifications shall achieve substantially the same results as would strict compliance with said plans and conditions. 4. Approval of Site Plan Review Case No. ZON2003 -00280 is for the construction of a 3,174 square foot first -story addition to the existing residence. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING, BUILDING, AND CODE ENFORCEMENT AND THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, A STRUCTURE SIZE CERTIFICATION BY A CERTIFIED CIVIL ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR SHALL BE SUBMITTED. 5. The proposed structure shall maintain the following minimum setbacks: Front: 20' -0" (proposed: 20' -2 ") West Side: 10' -0" (proposed: 22' -8 ") East Side: 10' -0" (proposed: 27'-0") Rear: 20' -0" (proposed: 20' -0 ") PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING, BUILDING, AND CODE ENFORCEMENT AND THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, FRONT AND REAR YARD SETBACK CERTIFICATION BY A CERTIFIED CIVIL ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR SHALL BE SUBMITTED. 6. - The proposed structure shall not exceed 15.98' in height, as measured from the point where the lowest foundation meets finished grade (111.97'), and 15.25', as measured from the highest grade covered by structure (112.70') to the top of the proposed ridge (127.45'). PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING, BUILDING, AND CODE ENFORCEMENT AND THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, A HEIGHT CERTIFICATION, BY A CERTIFIED CIVIL ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR SHALL BE SUBMITTED. Resolution No. 2004 -100 Exhibit A Page 1 of 2 7. The subject property shall not exceed a maximum lot coverage of forty (40) percent, as required by the RS -2 zoning district (proposed 38.6 %). 8. All structures located within the required twenty (20) foot front yard setback area shall not exceed a height of forty -two (42) inches in height. 9. The required twenty (20) foot front yard setback area shall be at least fifty (50) percent landscaped. 10. The proposed garage must maintain an unobstructed ground space of no less than eighteen (18) feet in width by twenty (20) feet in depth, with a minimum of seven (7) feet of vertical clearance over the space. 11. No improvements shall be permitted on "extreme slopes" (35% or greater). 12. Based on a site visit, Staff found that there is no foliage on the subject property that exceeds sixteen (16) feet in height and significantly impairs views from neighboring properties. Therefore, Staff finds that no foliage shall be removed under this application request. 13. The project shall substantially conform to the plans stamped approved with the effective date of this approval. 14. Permitted hours of construction are 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No work is permitted on Sundays or legal holidays. 15. The construction site and adjacent public and private properties shall be kept free of all loose materials resembling trash and debris in excess of that material used for immediate construction purposes. Such excess material may include, but is not limited to: the accumulation of debris, garbage, lumber, scrap metal, concrete, asphalt, piles of earth, salvage materials, abandoned or discarded furniture, appliances or other household fixtures. 16. In the event that a Planning requirement and a Building & Safety requirement are in conflict with one another, the stricter standard shall apply. 17. No grading is approved or allowed under this permit approval. 18. All applicable soils /geotechnical reports required by the Building and Safety Division shall be obtained by the applicant and approved by the City's geologist prior to building permit issuance. 19.All applicable permits required by the Building and Safety Division shall be obtained by the applicant. 20. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING, BUILDING, AND CODE ENFORCEMENT, the applicant shall remove all existing fences and ivy from the road and utility easement located to the front of the subject property. Resolution No. 2004 -100 Exhibit Page 2of2