Loading...
CC RES 2006-043RESOLUTION NO. 2006-43 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES DENYING THE APPEAL REQUEST; THEREBY UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO AFFIRM THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING, BUILDING, AND CODE ENFORCEMENT'S APPROVAL TO APPROVE VIEW PRESERVATION PERMIT NO. 78, WHICH WOULD REQUIRE THE TRIMMING OF CERTAIN FOLIAGE LOCATED AT 29258 POSEY WAY THAT IS SIGNIFICANTLY THE VIEW FROM 6755 EL RODEO ROAD. WHEREAS, on April 21, 2005, Mr. and Mrs. Park, owner of property located at 6755 El Rodeo Road (herein "the Applicants "), in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, filed a Notice of Intent to File for View Preservation application requesting a View Preservation Permit ( "Permit ") pre - application meeting in order to preserve the view from their property that is significantly impaired by foliage owned by Mr. and Mrs. Jordan at 29208 Posey Way (herein "the Foliage Owners "), in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes ( "City "); and, WHEREAS, on May 27, 2005, both parties attended a pre - application meeting and no private agreement was ultimately reached; and, WHEREAS, on November 10, 2005, Mr. and Mrs. Park, filed a formal application requesting a View Preservation Permit ( "Permit ") be approved in order to preserve the view from their property that is significantly impaired by foliage owned by Mr. and Mrs. Jordan at 29208 Posey Way, in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes; and, WHEREAS, on December 7, 2005, the Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement, issued a Notice of Decision (NOD) for View Preservation Permit No. 78, and copies of the NOD were mailed to the applicant and the foliage owners; and, WHEREAS, on December 22, 2005, within the fifteen day appeal period, Mrs. Jordan, the foliage owner, filed an appeal fee to appeal the Director's decision for VPP No. 78 to the Planning Commission; and, WHEREAS, after notice issued pursuant to the requirements of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 28, 2006, at which time the Planning Commission decided to continue the public hearing to March 14, 2006; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 14, 2006, at which time the Planning Commission decided to continue the public hearing to March 28, 2006; and WHEREAS, after notice issued pursuant to the requirements of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 28, 2006, at which time all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard and present evidence on the notice of appeal; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission denied the appeal and approved Resolution 2006 -15 for trimming and or removal of foliage on the Appellants' property; and WHEREAS, the Jordans filed fees and grounds for appeal on April 12, 2006 to have the case heard by the City Council to have the Planning Commission resolution rescinded back to City Staff for further review. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Applicants at 6755 El Rodeo Road has a view, as defined by Section 17.02.040 of the City's Development Code of the Santa Monica Bay and the Pacific Ocean. Section 2: The Applicants' primary viewing area, as defined by Section 17.02.040 of the City's Development Code, is from the living room and outdoor patio area. Section 3: The Applicants' view is significantly impaired by a Ficus hedge, three (3) Ficus tree(s), and two (2) King Palms on the property located at 29208 Posey Way (Jordan property). Section 4: The Applicants have complied with the early neighbor consultation process and have shown proof of cooperation on their part to resolve the matter. The Applicants have complied with the early neighbor consultation process by sending letters to the Foliage Owner, attending the pre - application meeting, and participating in the follow -up process with the View Restoration Mediator to come to a private agreement. Section 5: Based on the evidence provided, the subject trees at 29208 Posey Way exceed the ridgeline of the primary structure and significantly impair the view from the Applicants' viewing area. Based on the accepted documentation photograph provided by the Applicant, the City has determined that the subject foliage at 29208 Posey Way significantly impairs the Applicants' view. Section 6: The subject property is located less than one thousand (1,000) feet from the Applicants' property. The Foliage Owners' property at 29208 Posey Way is immediately adjacent to the Applicants' property at 6755 El Rodeo Road. Section 7: As evident in the Applicants' photograph dated in December 25, 1997, the subject foliage did not exist as view impairing foliage in November 1989, or sometime thereafter. Section 8: Trimming of the subject foliage will not cause an unreasonable infringement on the privacy of the Foliage Owners because the viewing impairing foliage subject to trimming is above the Foliage Owners' roofline. Furthermore, the Ficus Resolution No. 2006 -43 Page 2of3 hedge, maintained at its prescribed level, will provide screening of the rear property at 29208 Posey Way. As such, trimming or removal of the foliage will not cause unreasonable infringement of the privacy of the Foliage Owners. Section 9: Trimming or removing the subject trees as identified in the attached Exhibit "A ", is necessary in order to preserve the Applicants' view. Section 10: Pursuant to Section 15300 of the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project is categorically exempt under Class 4 of that section because the work required to restore the Applicants' view does not include the removal of scenic and mature trees as identified by the City of Rancho Palos Verdes General Plan (Visual Aspects; Figure 41). Section 11: Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure governs the time within which the judicial review of the decision reflected in this Resolution, if available, must be sought. Section 12: For the foregoing reasons and based on the information and findings included in the Director's Notice of Decision, meeting minutes and other records of proceedings, which are attached hereto by reference, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes hereby denies the appeal, thereby upholding the Planning Commission's decision and approves View Preservation Permit No 78 to trim or remove foliage at 29208 Posey Way in order to preserve the view from 6755 El Rodeo Road, as requested and provided for in the conditions outlined in the attached Exhibit "A ". PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on the 6th day of June 2006. Mayor Attest: wit Clerk State of California ) County of Los Angeles )ss City of Rancho Palos Verdes ) I, Carolynn Petru, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, hereby certify that the above Resolution No. 2006 -43 was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting held on June 6, 2006. its_ Ih, WIMM _ IL Resolution No. 2006 -43 Page 3 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-43 - EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VIEW PRESERVATION PERMIT NO. 78 1. The Ficus hedge and Ficus trees: Trim the foliage to reflect the condition shown in the documentation photograph dated December 25, 1997 (Exhibit E of the Staff Report), which is the same level as the solid yellow line illustrated in Exhibit F of the Staff Report or at a height level of approximately 12 feet, as measured from the top of the slope of the Foliage Owner's property, or to the top of the Applicants' rear -yard fence, whichever is lower. 2. The King Palms: Trim the foliage to reflect the condition shown in the documentation photograph dated December 25, 1997 (Exhibit E of the Staff Report), which is the same level as the solid yellow line illustrated in Exhibit F of the Staff Report 3. The Foliage Owner shall be responsible to maintain the foliage in such a manner as to not significantly impair the Applicants' view by trimming the foliage specified in this permit on a semi - annual basis, beginning 6 months after the initial trimming of the foliage is completed and verified by Staff. 4. If any of the subject tree(s) die as result of the trimming, then the tree(s) shall be removed subject to Section 8.24.060 (property maintenance) of the RPV Municipal Code. 5. If the required tree trimming or removal work as specified herein is not completed within 90 days, then the City of Rancho Palos Verdes shall forward the matter to the City Attorney for resolution. Should it be necessary that the City Attorney requires a court order to enforce the City's decision and in the event that the City is required to perform the work using a bonded tree service, the foliage owner will be billed for all City expenses incurred in enforcing the City's order and a lien or assessment may be recorded against the Foliage Owner's property if the invoice is not paid. Resolution No. 2006 -43 Page 1 of 1