CC RES 2012-003 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
PALOS VERDES ADOPTING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE DRIVING RANGE IN
CONNECTION WITH REVISION"ZZ"TO THE TRUMP NATIONAL GOLF
COURSE PROJECT.
WHEREAS, an application package was filed by the Zuckerman Building Company and Palos Verdes
Land Holdings Company requesting approval of tentative parcel maps, vesting tentative tract maps,
conditional use permits, a coastal permit and a grading permit to allow the construction of a Residential
Planned Development of 120 single family dwelling units and for development of an 18-hole golf course, a
clubhouse and parking facilities on a 258 acre site bounded by Palos Verdes Drive South on the north,
Portuguese Bend Club and Community Association on the west, the Pacific Ocean on the south and Los
Angeles County Shoreline Park on the east; and,
WHEREAS, a Draft Environmental Impact Report(DEIR)was prepared and circulated for 45 days
from June 7, 1991 through July 22, 1991 in order to receive written comments on the adequacy of the
document from responsible agencies and the public; and,
WHEREAS, subsequent to the circulation of the Draft Environmental Impact Report and preparation
of written responses, the applicant revised the scope of the project and reduced the number of proposed
single family residences to 40 units in Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 50666 and 43 in Vesting Tentative
Tract Map No. 50667, and an 18 hole golf course with related facilities within the boundaries of both Vesting
Tentative Tract Maps,and,due to the changes in the project,an Addendum to the Draft Environmental Impact
Report(AEIR)was prepared; and,
WHEREAS, based on review of the Addendum to the Draft Environmental Impact Report, the City
determined that the information submitted in the AEIR cited potential additional significant environmental
impacts that would be caused by the revised project, and directed preparation of a Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report(SEIR). The SEIR,which incorporates information and findings set forth in the
Addendum to the Draft Environmental Impact Report,was prepared and circulated for45 days from March 19,
1992 through May 4, 1992, during which time all interested parties were notified of the circulation period and
invited to present written comments to the information contained in the SEIR, in conformance with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act; and,
WHEREAS, on June 1, 1992 the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted Resolution
No. 92-53 certifying Environmental Impact Report No.36,in connection with Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos.
50666 and 50667, Tentative Parcel Map Nos. 20970 and 23004, Conditional Use Permit Nos. 162 and 163,
Coastal Permit No. 103, and Grading Permit No. 1541 for an 83 lot Residential Planned Development, public
open space, and an 18 hole public golf course with clubhouse and related facilities on 261.4 acres in Coastal
Subregions 7 and 8; and,
WHEREAS, on December 7, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted
Resolution No. 92-115 approving an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 36, in connection with
approving Revisions to the Ocean Trails project applications described above, in order to address concerns
expressed by the California Coastal Commission with regard to adequate provisions for public open space,
public access and habitat preservation; and,
WHEREAS, on October 5, 1993, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted
Resolution No. 93-89 approving a second Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 36, in connection
with re-approval of the Ocean Trails project applications described above, in order to comply with a Court
mandate to provide affordable housing in conjunction with the project, pursuant to Government Code Section
65590; and,
WHEREAS, on September 6, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted
Resolution No. 94-71 approving a third Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No.36,in connection with
approval of Revision "A" to the Ocean Trails project applications described above, in order to incorporate
changes to the project made by the California Coastal Commission in April 1993, and (based on additional
geologic information) relocate the golf course clubhouse, reduce the number of single family lots from 83 to 75
and approve a location for the golf course maintenance facility and on-site affordable housing units; and,
WHEREAS, on March 11, 1996, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted
Resolution No. 96-15 approving the fourth Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 36, in connection
with approval of Revision"B"to the Ocean Trails project applications described above, in order to incorporate
changes to the project made by the California Coastal Commission in January 1995 regarding the relocation of
the golf course clubhouse, Paseo Del Mar roadway and public trails to accommodate a reconfiguration of the
public parking facilities, as well as additional modifications to the public trails in order to provide clarification or
to be consistent with the California Coastal Commission's approval and to include an 8.5 acre vacant property
owned by the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District into the golf course.
WHEREAS, on September 3, 1996, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted
Resolution No.96-72 approving the fifth Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No.36,in connection with
approval of Revision "C" to the Ocean Trails project applications described above, in order to relocate two
single family residential lots in Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 50667 from the end of Street"A"to the end of
Street"C," revise the boundaries of open space Lots B, C, G and H, convert the split-level lots in Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 50667 to single-level lots, revise the golf course layout,revise the public trail system,
combine parallel trail easements, construct a paved fire access road west of the Ocean Terraces
Condominiums and modify several amendments to the Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Measures to
change the required timing for compliance; and,
WHEREAS, on August 18, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted
Resolution No. 98-76 approving Addendum No. 6 to Environmental Impact Report No. 36 and the proposed
Revision"G"to the Ocean Trails project, which included: 1)an 18%increase in the size of the clubhouse from
27,000 square feet to 32,927 square feet; 2) an increase in the size of the maintenance facility from 6,000
square feet to 9,504 square feet; 3) a two foot increase in the upslope height of the maintenance facility
building;and,4)relocation of the maintenance building and reconfiguration of the maintenance facility parking
lot.
WHEREAS, on February 2, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted
Resolution No. 99-10 approving Addendum No. 7 to Environmental Impact Report No. 36 and the proposed
Revision"H"to the Ocean Trails project,which included:changing 6 of the residential lots within VTTM 50667
from flat pad lots to split level lots, lowering the overall pad elevation for each lot,and lowering Street'B'within
the subdivision, and lowering the pad elevation for 6 other lots within the subdivision. Additionally, the
approval included the modification of the project's mitigation measures and conditions of approval to allow the
permitted construction hours for the entire Ocean Trails project to be expanded to include Sundays through
March 21, 1999.
WHEREAS,on May 4, 1999,the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted Resolution
No. 99-29 approving Addendum No. 8 to Environmental Impact Report No. 35 and the proposed Revision"I"
to the Ocean Trails project, which included a change to the design of the storm drain facilities of the Ocean
Trails project from a tunneled pipe system to the existing on-site canyons. Revision "I" only amended the
drainage for the east side of the Ocean Trails project, involving La Rotonda canyon; and,
WHEREAS, on July 20, 1999,the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted Resolution
No.99-55 approving Addendum No. 9 to Environmental Impact Report No. 35 and the proposed Revision"J"
to the Ocean Trails project, which included 1), the conditions requiring the establishment of a maintenance
district be revised by eliminating the maintenance district and having the golf course owner be the sole
responsible entity for maintenance thereby excluding the future residential homeowners; 2) withdrawn by
applicant; 3),the timing of the installation of ornamental fencing on each residential lot be delayed until prior to
issuance of certificate of occupancy; 4), delay the construction of two trails within VTTM 50666 from the
Resolution No. 2012-03
Page 2 of 7
Second Stage to the Third Stage of phasing within the Public Amenities Plan; 5), lower the approved
residential building pad elevations and create split-level pads in VTTM No. 50666; 6), delay the payment of
traffic impact fees to prior to Final Map No.50666;7), allow an increase in total building area of the clubhouse
by permitting a basement space;8),withdrawn by applicant;and 9), revise the hours permitted for golf course
landscape gardening; and,
WHEREAS, on May 16, 2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted
Resolution No. 2000-27 approving Addendum No. 10 to Environmental Impact Report No. 36 and the
proposed Revision"K"to the Ocean Trails project,which allowed a portion of the golf course to open for play
before all of the required public amenities have been completed due to delays caused by the failure of
Landslide C on June 2, 1999; and,
WHEREAS, on June 21, 2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted
Resolution No.2000-38 certifying a Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report to Environmental Impact
Report No. 36,adopting a Mitigation Monitoring Program, adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations,
and the proposed Revision"L"to the Ocean Trails project, for the repair of Landslide C at Ocean Trails; and,
WHEREAS, on July 18, 2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes approved
Revision M to the Ocean Trails Project,thereby approving an amendment to the Habitat Conservation Plan
(HCP), an amendment to the HCP Implementing Agreement, and approval of a Conservation Easement
over the lower portion of Shoreline Park; and,
WHEREAS, on September 5, 2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes approved
Revision N to the Ocean Trails Project,thereby approving a Mitigated Negative Declaration and amending the
project to accommodate a change to the design of the storm drain facilities of the Ocean Trails project from a
tunneled pipe system to the existing on-site canyons. Revision"N"only amended the drainage for the west
side of the Ocean Trails project, involving Forrestal Canyon; and,
WHEREAS, on February 20, 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes approved
Revision P to the Ocean Trails Project,thereby approving an amendment to allow Ocean Trails an extension
of time to provide 4 on-site affordable housing units for rent from "prior to one year of the opening of the
clubhouse"to"prior to the opening of the 18-hole golf course"; and,
WHEREAS, on February 20, 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes approved
Revision Q to the Ocean Trails Project, thereby approving an amendment which allows Ocean Trails to re-
construct(instead of re-pave)La Rotonda Drive from Palos Verdes South to the end of La Rotonda Drive, in
lieu of re-paving Palos Verdes Drive South from La Rotonda Drive to the eastern City limits; and,
WHEREAS, on September 21, 2001,the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes approved
Revision"R"to the Ocean Trails project to revise the Conditions of Approval for VTTM No. 50666 and VTTM
No. 50667,so as to adjust Condition 1-3 allowing an extension to completing the reconstruction of La Rotonda
Drive from Palos Verdes Drive South to its end; and,
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes approved
Amendment No.2 to the Ocean Trails Development Agreement to clarify that the City Council may extend any
approved tentative tract not to exceed the term of the Development Agreement and extend Vesting Tentative
Tract Map No. 50666; and,
WHEREAS, on June 7,2005,the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted a Mitigated
Negative Declaration and approved Revision "W' to the Trump National Golf Club project thereby revising
CUP No. 162,CUP No. 163,VTTM50666, and Grading Permit No. 1541 to accommodate a new driving range
in place of 16 residential lots within VTTM50666; and,
Resolution No. 2012-03
Page 3 of 7
WHEREAS, on November 20, 2007, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes approved
Amendment No. 3 to the Ocean Trails Development Agreement which extended the life of the Development
Agreement and existing Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 50666 from November 20, 2007 through March 9,
2008; and,
WHEREAS, on December 18,2007,the City Council denied Revision"GG"to Conditional Use Permit
No. 163, thereby denying a 12' high ficus hedge located at the western edge of the existing Driving Range;
and,
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2008, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes approved
Amendment No.4 to the Ocean Trails Development Agreement which extended the life of the Development
Agreement and existing Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 50666 from March 9, 2008 through July 18, 2008;
and,
WHEREAS, on July 15, 2008, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes approved
Amendment No. 5 to the Ocean Trails Development Agreement which extended the life of the Development
Agreement and existing Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.50666 from July 18,2008 through October 22,2008;
and,
WHEREAS, on October 21, 2008, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes approved
Amendment No. 6 to the Ocean Trails Development Agreement which extended the life of the Development
Agreement and existing Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 50666 from October 22,2008 through January 22,
2008; and,
WHEREAS, on January 21, 2009, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes approved
Revision"RR"to the Trump National Golf Club project,which extended the life of the Development Agreement
and existing Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.50666 from January 22,2009 through July 22,2009,and revised
Grading Permit No. 1541 to allow an additional temporary opening of the driving range to the public through
July 22, 2009; and,
WHEREAS, on July 21, 2009, the City Council, via Minute Order, approved a two month extension
(Revision "SS")of the Development Agreement, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 50666 and the temporary
use of the Driving Range at the request of the Applicant in order to accommodate the Applicant's schedule
and availability to attend the Council meeting. Said two month extension was granted to September 16,2009.
As part of that action, the Council also continued the item/public hearing on Revision"SS"to September 15,
2009; and
WHEREAS, on September 15, 2009, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes approved
Revision"SS"to the Trump National Golf Club project,which extended the life of the Development Agreement
and existing Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 50666 from September 16,2009 through March 17, 2010, and
revised Grading Permit No. 1541 to allow an additional temporary opening of the driving range to the public
through March 17, 2010; and,
WHEREAS, on March 16, 2010, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes approved
Revision"UU"to the Trump National Golf Club project,which extended the life of the Development Agreement
and existing Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 50666 from March 16, 2010 through September 21, 2010, and
revised Grading Permit No. 1541 to allow an additional temporary opening of the driving range to the public
through September 21, 2010; and,
WHEREAS, on September 21, 2010,the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes approved
Revision "V V" to the Trump National Golf Club project, which extended the life of the Development
Agreement and existing Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 50666 from September 21,2010 through March 21,
2011, and revised Grading Permit No. 1541 to allow an additional temporary opening of the driving range to
the public through March 21, 2011; and,
Resolution No. 2012-03
Page 4 of 7
WHEREAS, on March 15, 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes approved
Revision "W W' to the Trump National Golf Club project, which extended the life of the Development
Agreement and existing Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 50666 from March 21,2011 through September 21,
2011, and revised Grading Permit No. 1541 to allow an additional temporary opening of the driving range to
the public through September 21, 2011; and,
WHEREAS, on July 19, 2011, the City Council denied Revision"TT"to Conditional Use Permit No.
163, thereby denying two proposed varying height ficus hedges located at the western edge of the existing
Driving Range; and,
WHEREAS, VH Property Corp., submitted an application to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes
requesting approval of Revision "ZZ" to the Trump National Golf Club project to revise the conditions of
approval found within CUP No. 163, so as to allow one hedge row ranging in height from 6'-0" to 9'-8" and
composed of the New Zealand Christmas Tree species to be planted on the western edge of the existing
Driving Range; and,
WHEREAS, a Notice of Public Hearing for the Revision"ZZ" request to be heard by the City Council
on January 17, 2012,was published in the Peninsula News on Thursday, December 22, 2011, mailed to all
property owners within a 500' radius of the subject site, mailed to all neighboring homeowner associations,
mailed to the Trump National interested parties list and posted on the City's list-server messaging system for
the Trump National project; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources
Code Sections 21000 et.seq. ("CEQA"),the State CEQA Guidelines,California Code of Regulations,Title 14,
Sections 15000 et. seq., the City's Local CEQA Guidelines, and Government Code Section 65952.5(e)
(Hazardous Waste and Substances Statement),on January 12,2012,copies of the draft Addendum No. 1 to
the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Driving Range were distributed to the City Council and prior to
taking action on the proposed project,the City Council independently reviewed and considered the information
and findings contained in Addendum No. 1; and,
WHEREAS, on January 17,2012,after notice issued pursuant to the provisions of the Development
Code,the City Council held a public hearing to consider draft Addendum No. 1 to the Driving Range Mitigated
Negative Declaration,and Revision ZZ for a proposed hedge on the Driving Range,at which time all interested
parties were given an opportunity to be heard and present evidence; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES DOES
HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The Applicant's request for Revision ZZ includes a request to permit one row of New
Zealand Christmas Trees in the form of a hedge along the western edge of the Driving Range. The hedge row
is proposed to be 9.8' high at its northern end and gradually decreasing in height to 6.0' high at its southerly
end. Pursuant to Sections 15162 and 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, approval of Addendum No. 1 to
the previously certified Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Driving Range, rather than the preparation of a
new MND, is appropriate for the consideration of the proposed revisions to the Trump National project, based
on the following findings:
1. That subsequent changes proposed to the project do not require important revisions to the
previous MND, since there are no new environmental impacts that have been identified,
which were not considered in the previous MND. This is so, since the proposed changes
identified above and attached Exhibit"A"to Addendum No. 1 would not result in any new or
increased impacts to the environment that are not already analyzed within the MND.
More specifically,the Driving Range MND addressed a revision to the project that permitted
the installation of a Driving Range in place of residential lots within Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 50666. The MND analyzed the potential aesthetic impacts associated with the
development of the range and determined that because the proposed grading of the Driving
Resolution No. 2012-03
Page 5 of 7
Range would result in a finished project that would not affect views and aesthetics as much
as the prior subdivision, there would be no new significant impacts that were not analyzed
previously. The proposed hedge would be planted in a location and height that is also lower
than the previous subdivision and thus if the hedge was originally analyzed within the MND, it
would also have been found that there would be no significant impact.
Additionally,as part of the Driving Range MND's"Hazards"analysis,due to the design of the
proposed Driving Range and mitigation measures, it was found that there would be no
significant Hazard impacts as a result of the project. One such design feature included was
the installation of landscaping between the southern berm of the Driving Range and the trail
below to help protect trail users. A Mitigation Measure was added to ensure that said
landscaping did not grow higher than the elevation of the southerly berm to ensure that there
would not be an aesthetic impact caused by the landscaping. The intent of this mitigation
measure was to only address landscaping that was to grow on the southerly side of the
Driving Range's southerly berm. It was not intended to address other areas of the Driving
Range,where for example the proposed hedge will be located. Thus, it is important to note
that the proposed hedge is not inconsistent with this specific mitigation measure because this
specific mitigation measure does not apply to the area of the proposed hedge.
Therefore, there have been no substantial changes to the Project or to the environment
caused by the proposed hedge that would cause the Project to significantly impact the
environment, nor does the proposed hedge affect a change that would impact the
environment in any manner that was not previously considered and mitigated to the extent
feasible within the Driving Range MND.
2. That substantial changes to the project would not occur with respect to the circumstances
under which the project is undertaken, which would require important revisions to the
previous MND, since, as noted in #1 above, there are no new environmental impacts that
were not considered in the previous MND, and the approved project provides for changes
that only include the installation of landscaping (hedge).
3. That there is no new information of substantial importance to the project which indicates that
these approved changes will have one or more significant effects not discussed previously in
the MND; that significant effects previously examined will not be substantially more severe
than shown in the MND; that no mitigation measures or alternatives, previously found not to
be feasible, would now in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects of the project;or that no mitigation measures or alternatives which were not
previously considered in the MND, would now substantially lessen one or more significant
effects of the environment, because this approved project is only to permit modifications that
would allow the installation of landscaping (hedge).
Section 2: In approving Addendum No. 1 to the Driving Range MND, the City Council has reviewed
and considered the Addendum No. 1 document, attached hereto and made a part thereof as Exhibit"A".
Section 3: The Addendum No. 1 to the Driving Range MND identifies no new potential significant
adverse environmental impacts to the areas listed below, beyond those already identified in the adopted
Driving Range MND or the overall project's Final EIR No. 36, the Supplement, Second Supplement, and
Addenda Nos. 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27,28,
29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 43 to EIR No. 36, as a result of the proposed
revisions to the Trump National project:
1. Landform, Geology, and Soils
2. Hydrology and Drainage
3. Biological Resources
4. Cultural and Scientific Resources
5. Aesthetics
Resolution No. 2012-03
Page 6 of 7
6. Land Use and Relevant Planning
7. Circulation and Traffic
8. Air Resources
9. Noise
10. Public Services and Utilities
11. Population, Employment and Housing
12. Fiscal Impacts
Section 4: That implementation of the proposed changes to the project would not require additional
mitigation measures or significant deletions/modifications to the mitigation measures included in the adopted
Driving Range MND or the overall project's Final EIR,as well as the Supplemental,Second Supplemental,and
Addends Nos. 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22,23,24, 25, 26,27,28,
29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 43 to EIR No. 36.
Section 5: While the implementation of mitigation measures as discussed in the adopted Driving
Range MND and Final EIR No. 36 and the Supplemental, and the Second Supplemental, and Addenda EIR
Nos. 1,2, 3,4, 5,6, 7, 8,9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29, 30,31,
32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39,40,41, 42 and 43 to EIR 36 will further reduce these impacts, it is not possible
to entirely eliminate cumulative impacts to the areas of concern listed in EIR No. 36, above. Therefore, the
Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations, as provided in Final EIR No. 36, are hereby
incorporated by reference.
Section 6: All findings, attachments and Statement of Overriding Considerations contained in
Resolution Nos. 92-53, 92-115, 93-89,94-71, 96-15,and 2006-62,as adopted by the City Council on June 1,
1992, December 7, 1992, October 5, 1993, September 6, 1994, March 11, 1996, September 3, 1996, and
June 7, 2005 respectively, are hereby incorporated by reference.
Section 7: The time within which the judicial review of the decision reflected in this Resolution, if
available, must be sought is governed by Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure or any other
applicable short period of limitations.
Section 8: For the foregoing reasons and based on the information and findings contained in the staff
reports, minutes, and evidence presented at the public hearings,the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos
Verdes hereby approves Addendum No. 1 to the Driving Range Mitigated Negative Declaration,based on the
City Council's determination that the document was completed in compliance with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act and State and local guidelines with respect thereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 31st day of J. uary 201 .
Mayor
Attest
dilt&
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES )
I, Carla Morreale, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, hereby certify that the above Resolution No.
2012-03 was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting held on
January 31, 2012.
gtt-id-- /
City Clerk
Resolution No. 2012-03
Page 7 of 7
Resolution No. 2012-03
Exhibit"A"
ADDENDUM NO. 1
TO
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE DRIVING RANGE
The City Council has reviewed the proposed Revision "ZZ" to the Trump National Golf
Course Project, which is a request to allow a varying height (6'-0" to 9'-8" tall) hedge
composed of the New Zealand Christmas Tree species to be planted on the western end
of the Driving Range, in conjunction with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as well as State and Local CEQA Guidelines, and
find as follows:
That the approved request would not result in any new or increased impacts to the
environment that are not already analyzed within the Mitigated Negative Declaration
(MND) for the Driving Range, because it simply allows for the planting of a hedge on the
Driving Range which would not impact the environment in any manner that was not
previously considered and mitigated to the extent feasible through the Driving Range
MND.
More specifically, the Driving Range MND addressed a revision to the project that
permitted the installation of a Driving Range in place of residential lots within Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 50666. The MND analyzed the potential aesthetic impacts
associated with the development of the range and determined that because the
proposed grading of the Driving Range would result in a finished project that would not
affect views and aesthetics as much as the prior subdivision, there would be no new
significant impacts that were not analyzed previously. The proposed hedge would be
planted in a location and height that is also lower than the previous subdivision and thus
if the hedge was originally analyzed within the MND, it would also have been found that
there would be no significant impact.
Additionally, as part of the Driving Range MND's "Hazards" analysis, due to the design
of the proposed Driving Range and mitigation measures, it was found that there would
be no significant Hazard impacts as a result of the project. One such design feature
included was the installation of landscaping between the southern berm of the Driving
Range and the trail below to help protect trail users. A Mitigation Measure was added to
ensure that said landscaping did not grow higher than the elevation of the southerly
berm to ensure that there would not be an aesthetic impact caused by the landscaping.
The intent of this mitigation measure was to only address landscaping that was to grow
on the southerly side of the Driving Range's southerly berm. It was not intended to
address other areas of the Driving Range, where for example the proposed hedge will
be located. Thus, it is important to note that the proposed hedge is not inconsistent with
this specific mitigation measure because this specific mitigation measure does not apply
to the area of the proposed hedge.
Therefore, there have been no substantial changes to the Project or to the environment
caused by the proposed hedge that would cause the Project to significantly impact the
environment, nor does the proposed hedge affect a change that would impact the
environment in any manner that was not previously considered and mitigated to the
extent feasible within the Driving Range MND.
Resolution No. 2012-03
Exhibit A
Page 1 of 1