CC MINS 20090912 ADJ MINUTES
RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 12, 2009
The meeting was called to order at 9:08 A.M. by Mayor Pro Tern Wolowicz at the
Peninsula Montessori School Auditorium, 31100 Hawthorne Boulevard, notice having
been given with affidavit on file.
City Council roll call was answered as follows:
PRESENT: Dyda, Long, Stern, and Mayor Pro Tern Wolowicz
ABSENT: Mayor Clark (excused/recused)
Also present were Carolyn Lehr, City Manager; Carol Lynch, City Attorney; Joel Rojas,
Director of Community Development; Ara Mihranian, Principal Planner; Carla Morreale,
City Clerk; and Teresa Takaoka, Deputy City Clerk.
Also present was Jeff Lewis, Chair of the Planning Commission.
FLAG SALUTE:
The Flag Salute was led by City Manager Lehr.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Councilman Stern moved, seconded by Councilman Dyda, to approve the agenda as
presented.
Without objection, Mayor Pro Tern Wolowicz so ordered.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
None.
NEW BUSINESS:
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Appeal of the Planning Commission's Conditional Approval of the Marymount
College Facilities Expansion Project: Conditional Use Permit No. 9 — Revision
"E," Grading Permit, Variance, Minor Exception Permit, Master Sign Permit and
Environmental Assessment (Case No. ZON2003-00317) - 30800 Palos Verdes
Drive East [Continued from August 18, 2009] (1203)
City Council Minutes
September 12, 2009
Page 1 of 5
City Clerk Morreale reported that this public hearing was continued from August 18,
2009.
Mayor Pro Tem Wolowicz reported on a recent announcement from Marymount College
representatives regarding conditional approval from a governing accreditation agency
for the college to offer baccalaureate degrees and requested that City Attorney Lynch
provide information to the Council and public regarding the matter.
City Attorney Lynch reported that the City of Rancho Palos Verdes first heard of the
issue on September 4, 2009, at which time staff engaged Marymount College
representatives in discussions with the applicant's attorney. She reported that the
difficulty with the present situation was that the City of Rancho Palos Verdes staff does
not have a clear picture of what the environmental ramifications would be with the
modification of Marymount College from a two-year to four-year institution regarding
traffic impacts. She noted that it would be required by California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) to have further analysis of the issue so that the Council would understand
the environmental ramifications and mitigation measures if any. She suggested
possible processing alternatives at this point to allow additional information to be
evaluated regarding the potential issues that have been raised recently.
Council discussion ensued regarding the need for further environmental review with a
possible re vision to the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to analyze the impacts that
may exist as a result of the recent news that Marymount College is planning to expand
from a two-year to four-year institution; the fact that California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) does not allow the project to be broken up into smaller pieces; issues that
should be addressed in the project EIR such as remedial grading.
Dr. Michael Brophy, Marymount College, stated that Marymount College would address
questions regarding the entitlement and the baccalaureate program and introduced Don
Davis, counsel for Marymount College.
Don Davis, counsel for Marymount College, Burke, Williams & Sorensen, stated that he
believed there was a misunderstanding of the CEQA process, which is to review the
environmental impacts of a project. He stated that Marymount College was not seeking
approval of the baccalaureate program as that program was not part of the original
application or part of the application at any of the critical points of approval in the
process. He noted that CEQA allows for changes, addendums, and the issuance of
mitigated negative declarations, if necessary, regarding a project once it is approved.
Discussion ensued between Council, staff, and the applicant regarding possible further
EIR studies and analysis regarding the probable expansion of the College to a four-year
program in the reasonably foreseeable future; traffic analysis based on the Junior
College student rate versus the facility rate; remedial grading; location of the sports
field; athletic building/gymnasium and parking; and, the hours of operation for the
college.
City Council Minutes
September 12, 2009
Page 2 of 5
Dr. Brophy stated that Marymount College has received much support from the public
regarding the proposed four-year baccalaureate degree especially since the College
has been offering baccalaureate and Master's degrees for a decade through the
Weekend College program. He commented on the College's Summer International
School Program; the numerous delays in the approval process; and, the College's
cooperation at every step in the process. He reported that the Board of Directors first
authorized the College to seek information regarding the possibility of the baccalaureate
degree in June 2009
RECESS AND RECONVENE:
Mayor Pro Tern Wolowicz called a brief recess from 10:13 A.M. to 10:23 A.M.
Director of Community Development Rojas provided a preliminary timeline based on the
Council discussion and outlined the following steps: to obtain information from
Marymount College regarding the proposed baccalaureate program, the revision of the
EIR focused only on this topic, and the recirculation of the EIR, which he estimated
would be ready to return in February 2010 to either the Planning Commission or the City
Council.
Douglas Carstens, counsel for Concerned Citizens Coalition/Marymount Expansion
(CCC/ME), Chatten-Brown & Carstens, Santa Monica, stated that CCC/ME desires the
item to be remanded to the Planning Commission with instructions regarding the athletic
building, the athletic field, remedial grading and drainage, the extended construction
schedule of eight years, and the hours of operation of the college. He also noted issues
related to parking, traffic, and the size of the parcel in relation to the use of the property
as a four-year college.
Lois Karp, Concerned Citizens Coalition/Marymount Expansion (CCC/ME), Rancho
Palos Verdes, spoke in opposition to the project and noted that the EIR as presented
cannot be certified in light of the recently announced proposal to change the college to a
four-year program. She noted that CEQA requires that all foreseeable aspects of the
project should be studied. She stated that additional EIR studies should be made to
address the following issues: traffic, hours of operation, crime statistics, remedial
grading and related landscaping changes, drainage, and the construction schedule of
eight years.
Council, appellant, and applicant discussion ensued on the possibility of the Marymount
College project being remanded to staff and then brought back to Council instead of the
Planning Commission.
Jeff Lewis, Chair, Planning Commission, stated that he was in favor of the item being
brought back to the Council and noted that the EIR certified by the Planning
Commission was no longer valid since the announced proposal to change the college
City Council Minutes
September 12, 2009
Page 3 of 5
from a two-year to four-year institution. He observed that the announcement by
Marymount College may operate in the school's favor.
Mr. Davis stated that Marymount College desired that any of the facility-related issues
be raised at this meeting in order to avoid a second remand of the project.
Ms. Karp stated that there should be a limit on the items discussed at this meeting.
George Zugsmith, Concerned Citizens Coalition/Marymount Expansion (CCC/ME),
Rancho Palos Verdes, spoke in opposition to the project and inquired as to the issues
that would be able to be discussed as a result of the issuance of the EIR.
Kenneth Goldman, El Prado Homeowners Association, Rancho Palos Verdes, spoke in
opposition to the project. He opined that the existing athletic field and tennis courts
should be retained, and the expansion of the project restricted to the proposed building
additions, excluding the dormitories, which would result in a 67% reduction in grading,
improved air quality, less noise, sufficient site parking for the college, and a shortened
construction period.
Grace Maholepsay, Rancho Palos Verdes, spoke in opposition to the project noting
traffic concerns with the use of the athletic field, which could bring in large crowds.
Jim Gordon, Concerned Citizens Coalition/Marymount Expansion (CCC/ME), Rancho
Palos Verdes, spoke in opposition to the project noting the errors and omissions
regarding the project including the actual amount of grading, geologic hazard issues,
and drainage issues.
Laura McSherry, Rancho Palos Verdes, spoke in opposition to the projects based on
concerns regarding hydrology and geology.
Mike DeNardo, Rancho Palos Verdes, spoke in opposition to the project based on
concerns regarding drainage and the retaining wall which is adjacent to his property.
Franklin Melton, Rancho Palos Verdes, spoke in opposition to the project with concerns
regarding access and traffic during emergencies such as the recent wildfire.
RECESS AND RECONVENE:
Mayor Pro Tem Wolowicz called a lunch recess from 11:58 A.M. to 12:41 P.M.
Cliff Van Wagner, Rancho Palos Verdes, spoke in opposition to the project noting
concerns with the proposed change to a four-year college and possible on-campus
dormitories. He endorsed the Council's consideration to remand the project back for
further studies.
City Council Minutes
September 12, 2009
Page 4 of 5
Terri Glidden, Rancho Palos Verdes, spoke in favor of the project noting that
Marymount College has been a positive force in the community and has served the
community beyond its student body.
Ms. Karp stated that CCC/ME was never against Marymount College and that their only
objectives were to minimize the impact that the college may have on the residents who
live nearby and to request that the size of the site be used appropriately.
Council discussion ensued regarding an alternate location for the athletic field as being
one of the aspects of the project to be examined and the appropriateness of the future
meeting to be an appeal hearing.
Councilman Long moved, seconded by Councilman Stern, to remand the item back to
staff with further environmental studies to address the following two issues: 1) The
affect, if any, that the proposed four-year college program would have on each
component of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR); and, 2) The examination of all of
the appropriate environmental impacts related to the alternative location for the athletic
field, as recommended by staff. The public hearing was continued to a date uncertain,
but will be brought back to Council expeditiously, with a 45-day public comment period
on the new EIR analysis, as recommended by staff.
The motion passed on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Dyda, Long, Stern, and Mayor Pro Tem Wolowicz
NOES: None
ABSENT: Clark
ADJOURNMENT:
At 1:07 P.M., Mayor Pro Tern Wolowicz adjourned the meeting to Tuesday, September
15, 2009 at 6:00 P.M. for an Adjourned Regular Meeting to conduct interviews for the
Finance Advisory Committee.
.yor
Attest:
City Clerk
W:\City Council Minutes\2009\20090912 CC MINS ADJ MTG.doc
City Council Minutes
September 12, 2009
Page 5 of 5