Loading...
CC RES 2009-006 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-06 . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 2002-43 IN RESPONSE TO THE COURT OF APPEAL'S DECISION IN THE MONKS V. CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES CASE WHEREAS, pursuant to the direction of the City Council, Cotton, Shires & Associates prepared a report dated January 14, 2002; and WHEREAS, on May 20, 2002, at a duly noticed public meeting, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes reviewed the report that was prepared by Cotton, Shires & Associates and discussed certain findings that should be made as a result of the report; and WHEREAS, on June 12, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2002-43, which set forth its findings regarding the report that was prepared by Cotton Shires, and directed City Staff to continue to deny requests for development permits for new homes in the Zone 2 area of the Portuguese Bend landslide complex, until an applicant submits a complete Landslide Moratorium Exclusion application that is supported by adequate geologic data demonstrating a factor of safety of 1.5 or greater of the Zone 2 area, which is the same standard that is applied throughout the City, to the satisfaction of the City Geologist; and the City Council approves the Landslide Moratorium Exclusion application, and all other required permits to develop are issued by the City; and WHEREAS, following the adoption of Resolution No. 2002-43, the owners of sixteen lots within Zone 2 filed a lawsuit entitled Monks.v. City of Rancho Palos Verdes, alleging an inverse condemnation claim under the State Constitution; and WHEREAS, the trial court determined that a permanent taking had not occurred and found in favor of the City; and WHEREAS, on October 22, 2008, the California Court of Appeal reversed the decision of the trial court, finding that since City has allowed existing homes to remain and has allowed the rebuilding and expansion of those homes, preventing the construction of new homes on the plaintiffs' lots was not justified, even though the Factor of Safety for Zone 2 has not been specifically ascertained. The Court of Appeal then stated that: "'Uncertainty' is not a sufficient basis for depriving a property owner of a home. The city must establish a reasonable probability of significant harm to obtain an injunction against a nuisance." The Court of Appeal then held that the City's refusal to allow the plaintiffs to construct homes on their lots is a permanent taking of property for which compensation must be paid by the City; and WHEREAS, On December 17, 2008, the California Supreme Court denied the City's petition for review in the Monks case; and WHEREAS, the Court of Appeal has issued its remitittur sending the case back to the trial court "for further proceedings to determine an appropriate remedy for the permanent taking exacted by the city;" NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. In response to the decision of the California Court of Appeal in the Monks case, and as the initial step that will be taken by the City to avoid having to pay compensation to the plaintiffs for a permanent taking of their properties, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes hereby repeals Resolution No. 2002-43 so that as of this date, Resolution No. 2002-43 is of no further force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of January 2009. PA.. LAI IMF Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES ) I, Carla Morreale, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, do hereby certify that the above Resolution No. 2009-06 was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on January 21, 2009. A(L6 City Clerk 1111457-1 Resolution No. 2009-06 Page 2of2