CC RES 2010-064 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS
VERDES TAKING A UNANIMOUS POSITION IN OPPOSITION TO THE
MARYMOUNT INITIATIVE CERTIFIED FOR THE NOVEMBER 2, 2010
BALLOT.
Whereas, the Marymount Initiative, a voter sponsored initiative prepared
by Marymount College, a private liberal arts college, was submitted to the City
Clerk on Tuesday March 2, 2010;
Whereas, the City recognizes the right of the voters to use the Initiative
process when it is used to advance the public health, safety and welfare;
Whereas, on June 3, 2010, the City Clerk certified that sufficient
signatures on petitions had been obtained to qualify the Initiative for a special
election;
Whereas, the City Council, at a public meeting on June 15, 2010, ordered
a special election to be held on the Initiative and consolidated the special election
with the November 2, 2010 election;
Whereas, on June 15, 2010, the City Council received a report on the
differences between the Marymount Initiative and the City Council-approved plan
for the expansion of the Marymount campus. That evening, the City Council
received additional staff reports, presentations, updates and extensive public
comments thereon;
Whereas, the City Council held a duly noticed public meeting on June 15,
2010, to consider whether or not to take a position on the Marymount measure in
light of the differences between the Marymount-sponsored Initiative and the
Marymount plan approved by the City Council and the effects of each upon the
community;
Whereas, the City Council had reviewed extensive materials at several
public meetings over the course of many months prior to June 15, 2010, to fully
understand the Marymount modernization plan, and had carefully considered the
plan, obtaining significant public input addressing the positive and negative
aspects of the plan, and the impact of the plan on the residents of the City of
Rancho Palos Verdes, and various neighborhoods within the City;
Whereas, the City Council had previously granted approval for most of the
improvements proposed by Marymount in its plan, on June 1, 2010, following
many public hearings where public testimony was obtained;
Whereas, the City Council granted Marymount the right to construct a new
and improved athletic field near to the Marymount-requested location, and a
majority of the City Council moved the athletic field sixty feet farther to the east to
create a buffer;
Whereas, numerous members of the public urged the City Council to take
an official position against the Marymount Initiative because: 1) the City Council
was elected to act as the citizens' final voice on important land use issues; 2) the
Initiative has a direct impact on the City and its operations; 3) the.City Council
has the resources and the experience to evaluate and understand the
complexities of land use issues and this Initiative's impact on a significant land
use issue, and 4) the City Council and the Planning Commission have devoted
many hours reviewing detailed reports, obtaining public input and evaluating and
understanding the Marymount plan and its impact on the residents of the City;
Whereas, the City Council determined that taking a position on the
Marymount Initiative is an appropriate method of fulfilling its duty to protect the
public health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City and to inform the
residents about the City Council's concerns; and
Whereas, the City Council has carefully considered the provisions of the
Marymount Initiative and determined that it does not advance the health, safety
and welfare of our community;
NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA, DOES FIND, RESOLVE, DECLARE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes is
unanimously opposed to the Marymount Initiative on the November
2, 2010 ballot for the following reasons:
A) The Initiative Interferes with the City's Self Rule. The City was
incorporated 37 years ago to gain oversight over local land use issues and
to avert high-density developments. The Marymount Initiative takes away
the City's local authority by creating a special district where Marymount is
not subject to many safety, aesthetic or geological mitigations that the City
regularly applies to other properties and projects. The City Council has
already authorized virtually all the modernization improvements requested
by Marymount. However, there are 62 different items, including high
density dormitories, in the Marymount Initiative that differ from the project
submitted by Marymount and approved by the City Council. This is an
abuse of the initiative power and creates a precedent for future high-
density developments in Rancho Palos Verdes.
B) The Initiative Undermines Local Planning Laws. The City's General
Plan, zoning laws and other regulations form the basis for orderly land use
development in Rancho Palos Verdes that preserve a low-density
community. These regulations apply equally to all properties in Rancho
Resolution No. 2010-64
Page 2 of 4
Palos Verdes. The Marymount Initiative amends and overrides these
important laws that protect the safety and quality of life in Rancho Palos
Verdes, making special exceptions for Marymount College. A private
institution's polices and priorities should not supersede those of the City
and its residents.
C) The Initiative is Not Necessary to allow Marymount to Modernize its
Campus. The City Council carefully reviewed all aspects of the
Marymount plan and granted Marymount the right to modernize its
campus with all the buildings, of the size requested, with all the
functionality and amenities that Marymount requested, except for high-
density dormitories. However, Marymount did not request that the City
Council approve the dormitories. Although Marymount initially included
dormitories in its proposal, it strategically decided to withdraw the request
from its proposal in order to obtain City approval, and then proposed the
Initiative as an end run around the City's process.
D) The Initiative would return the Athletic Field to its original location
sixty feet farther to the west, removing the buffer.
E) The Initiative Eliminates Conditions imposed to Minimize Negative
Consequences of the Project on the Residents. In order to protect the
residents of the City, the City Council imposed conditions to mitigate
negative impacts of the Marymount expansion plan. Some of the
mitigation measures are modified or eliminated by the Initiative, to the
harm of the residents of the City.
F) The Initiative Authorizes After-the-Fact Changes. The Marymount
Initiative allows the College to remove mandated conditions that are
designed to increase safety and City oversight that is necessary to
maintain a reasonable quality of life in the surrounding neighborhoods.
These conditions were determined after many hours of study and analysis
by both the Planning Commission and City Council with consideration
given to both Marymount and the residents. Should the voters approve the
Initiative, Marymount will have authority to make incremental changes to
its project such that what is presented under the Marymount Initiative may
not be what finally is developed. The possibility that a "bait and switch"
might occur deprives the voters of their right to know exactly the nature of
the project on which they are voting.
G) The Initiative Leaves Many Unanswered Questions. The meaning of
many aspects of the Marymount Initiative will not become clear until after it
is approved and the College finishes the project sometime in the future.
With unlimited time to complete the project, it may be many years before
the impact of the project is truly known, if at all. The City, meanwhile, will
have limited oversight during construction. In addition, the City will not
have oversight capabilities regarding operations at the college that could
Resolution No. 2010-64
Page 3 of 4
adversely affect the quality of life of the residents and/or any safety
considerations.
Section 2. Based on the foregoing, the City Council of the City of
Rancho Palos Verdes encourages all Rancho Palos Verdes
registered voters to vote against the Marymount Initiative in the
November 2, 2010 Special Election.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on July 20, 2010.
411111/—„!.....40
ayor
Attest:
&tag 1Iui41!'
City Clerk
State of California )
County of Los Angeles )ss
City of Rancho Palos Verdes )
I, Carla Morreale, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, hereby certify
that the above Resolution No. 2010-64 was duly and regularly passed and
adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting held on July 20, 2010.
City Clerk
Resolution No. 2010-64
Page 4 of 4