CC RES 2010-008 RESOLUTION NO. 2010- 08
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
PALOS VERDES CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
MAKING CERTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS IN ASSOCIATION WITH
AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, FOR CASE NOS. SUB2008-00001
AND ZON2008-00074 THRU -00078 FOR A PROPOSED 4-LOT
SUBDIVISION TO ACCOMMODATE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR NEW
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON THE FOUR NEW LOTS; LOCATED AT
32639 NANTASKET DRIVE, WHICH IS ON THE WEST SIDE OF
NANTASKET DRIVE BETWEEN BEACHVIEW DRIVE AND SEACOVE
DRIVE IN THE CITY'S COASTAL ZONE (APN 7573-014-013).
WHEREAS, on September 26, 2006, November 14, 2006, January 9, 2007, March
13, 2007, and March 27, 2007,the Planning Commission considered Case Nos.ZON2005-
00536 and ZON2006-00180 thru -00182 for a proposed General Plan Land Use
Designation Change from Commercial to Residential, a Coastal Specific Plan Land Use
Designation Change from Agricultural to Residential, a Zone Change from CR(Commercial
Recreational)to RS-4 (Single-Family Residential), a 5-lot subdivision and development of
five single-family residences on the subject property, which is a vacant parcel located at
32639 Nantasket Drive, between Beachview Drive and Seacove Drive (APN 7573-014-
013); and,
WHEREAS, on April 24, 2007, the Planning Commission adopted PC Resolution
Nos. 2007-29, 2007-30 and 2007-31, recommending that the City Council certify the
Mitigated Negative Declaration; approve the Land Use Designation changes to Residential;
approve the Zone Change to RS-4 (Single-Family Residential); approve the single-family
residences on Lots 1 and 2; and deny the single-family residences on Lots 3, 4, and 5 due
to these residences not being compatible with the immediate neighborhood with regards to
bulk and mass; and,
WHEREAS, on May 15, 2007, the proposed project, along with the Planning
Commission's April 24, 2007 recommendations were presented to the City Council for
consideration. After hearing public testimony and discussing the merits of the project,the
City Council denied the applications and remanded the item back to the Planning
Commission with instructions that consideration be given to rezone the subject property
from Commercial Recreational to RS-2 or RS-3, which are less dense residential zoning
districts than the Planning Commission's recommendation to rezone the subject property to
RS-4; and,
WHEREAS, in response to the City Council's May 15, 2007 directive, the property
owner/applicant submitted new applications on January 31, 2008, which are the same
application types submitted in 2006 and 2007. However, the current January 31, 2008
proposal includes a zone change to RS-3 instead of RS-4, which is a lower density; a4-lot
subdivision and residential development instead of a 5-lot subdivision; Height Variation
applications for Lots 3 and 4 to exceed the 16-foot height limit; a Grading Permit for a total
of 4,028 cubic yards of grading to facilitate the construction of the new residences on the
four new lots; and, continues to propose a General Plan Land Use Designation Change
from Commercial to Residential, a Coastal Specific Plan Land Use Designation Change
from Agricultural to Residential, a Variance to allow the RS-3 zoned lots to maintain a lot
depth of 93' instead of the 110' lot depth requirement; and, a Coastal Permit for the
development project proposed within the City's Coastal Zone (hereinafter referred to as
Case Nos. SUB2008-00001 and ZON2008-00074 thru -00078); and,
WHEREAS, on February 25, 2008, Case Nos. SUB2008-00001 and ZON2008-
00074 thru -00078 were deemed incomplete pending the submittal of additional
information; and,
WHEREAS, after submittal of additional information, including construction and
certification of the required temporary silhouettes, on September 29,2009 the applications
were deemed to be generally complete for processing; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provision of the California Environmental Quality Act,
Public Resources Code Section 21000 et.seq. ("CEQA"), the State's CEQA Guidelines,
California Code of Regulation, Title 14, Section 15000 et.seq., the City's Local CEQA
Guidelines, and Government Code Section 65962.5(F)(Hazardous Waste and Substances
Statement), the City of Rancho Palos Verdes prepared an Initial Study and determined
that, by incorporating mitigation measures into the Negative Declaration, there is no
substantial evidence that the approval of Case Nos. SUB2008-00001 and ZON2008-00074
thru -00078, otherwise known as General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Coastal
Specific Plan Amendment, Vesting Parcel Map, Variance, Coastal Permit, Grading, and
Height Variations, would result in a significant adverse effect on the environment.
Accordingly, a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and notice of that fact
was given in the manner required by law; and,
WHEREAS, the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Studywere prepared and
circulated for public review between October 2, 2009 and November 10, 2009; and,
WHEREAS, on October 2, 2009, the City mailed notices to all property owners
within a 500-foot radius from the subject property, including the Sea Bluff HOA, informing
them of the Planning Commission hearing to consider the pending development
applications. Further, the notice was published in the Peninsula News on October 8, 2009.
WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, a Mitigation Monitoring
program has been prepared, and is attached to the Environmental Assessment and
Resolution as Exhibit "A"; and,
WHEREAS, copies of the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration were distributed to
the Planning Commission, and prior to taking action on the proposed development
proposal, the Planning Commission independently reviewed and considered the
information and findings contained in the Negative Declaration and determined that the
document was prepared in compliance with the requirements of CEQA and local
guidelines, with respect thereto; and,
1202733
Resolution No. 2010-08
Page 2
WHEREAS, after issuing notices pursuant to the requirements of the Rancho Palos
Verdes Development Code and the State CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission
held a duly noticed public hearing on November 10, 2009, at which time all interested
parties were given an opportunity to be heard and present evidence; and,
WHEREAS, at a public hearing held on November 10, 2009, the Planning
Commission adopted P.C. Resolution No. 2009-47, recommending that the City Council
certify the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Case Nos. SUB2008-00001 and ZON2008-
00074 thru -00078; and,
WHEREAS, copies of the Mitigated Negative Declaration were distributed to the City
Council and prior to taking action on the proposed project associated with Case Nos.
SUB2008-00001 and ZON2008-00074 thru -00078, the City Council independently
reviewed and considered the information and findings contained in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and determined that the document was prepared in compliance with the
requirements of CEQA and local guidelines, with respect thereto; and,
WHEREAS, after issuing notice pursuant to the requirements of the City's
Development Code and the State CEQA Guidelines,the City Council of the City of Rancho
Palos Verdes held a public hearing on February 2,2010, at which time all interested parties
were given an opportunity to be heard and present evidence.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The proposed project is fora General Plan Amendment to change the
land use designation from Commercial Recreational (CR)to Single-Family Residential, 2-
to-4 dwelling units per acre; a Zone Change from CR to RS-3; Coastal Specific Plan
Amendment to change the land use designation from Agricultural to Residential;
subdivision of the existing 1.42-acre site to four single-family residential lots; development
of a single-family residence on each lot; a Variance to allow the four lots to maintain a lot
depth of 93', which is less than the 110' lot depth requirement for RS-3 zoned lots; a
Grading Permit for approximately 4,028 cubic yards of total grading on all 4 lots to
accommodate the construction of a single-family residence on each lot; and Height
Variation Permits for the single-family residential structures on Lots 3 and 4 (the 2 lots
closest to Sea Cove Drive), to exceed the 16' building height requirement. The City
Council finds that the project would not result in significant adverse environmental impacts.
In making this finding, the City Council considered the project's mitigation measures that
address the issues of Aesthetics, Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils,
Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, Public Services, and Transportation and Circulation.
Section 2: The City Council has independently reviewed and considered the
proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,the public comments upon it, and other evidence
before the Council prior to taking action on the proposed project and finds that the
Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in the manner required by law and that there
1202733
Resolution No. 2010-08
Page 3
is no substantial evidence that,with appropriate mitigation measures,the approval of Case
Nos. SUB2008-00001 and ZON2008-00074 thru -00078 would result in a significant
adverse effect upon the environment.
Section 3: There are no sensitive natural habitat areas on the subject site. Thus,
no site disturbance or alteration will result from the approval of Case Nos. SUB2008-00001
and ZON2008-00074 thru -00078, and therefore, the project will have no individual or
cumulative adverse impacts upon resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the State Fish
and Game Code.
Section 4: The Initial Study identified the following issue areas that may result in
a potentially significant environmental impact(s) as a result of the proposed project:
Aesthetics, Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hydrology and Water
Quality, Noise, Public Services, and Transportation and Circulation. However, with the
appropriate mitigation measures in the attached Mitigation Monitoring Program (Exhibit
"A"), which address impacts upon the aforementioned issue areas,the project will not have
a significant adverse environmental impact.
Section 5: For reasons discussed in the Initial Study,which is incorporated herein
by reference, the proposed project will not have any potential to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals, nor would the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable.
Section 6: The Lead Agency has consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section
65962.5 of the Government Code, and has certified that the development project and any
alternatives proposed in this application are not included in these lists of known Hazardous
Waste and Substances Sites as compiled by the California Environmental Protection
Agency.
Section 7: Based upon the foregoing findings, the adoption of the proposed
Mitigated Negative Declaration is in the public interest.
Section 8: The mitigation measures set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring
Program, Exhibit "A", attached hereto, are incorporated into the scope of the proposed
project. These measures will reduce potential significant impacts identified in the Initial
Study to a less than significant level.
Section 9: The time within which the judicial review of the decision reflected in
this Resolution, if available, must be sought is governed by Section 1094.6 of the California
Code of Civil Procedure or other applicable shortened periods of limitation.
Section 10: For the foregoing reasons and based on the information and findings
included in the Staff Report, Environmental Assessment and other components of the
legislative record, in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, and in the public
comments received by the Council, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes
hereby certifies that the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance
1202733
Resolution No. 2010-08
Page 4
with CEQA, and therefore adopts the attached Mitigation Monitoring Program (Exhibit"A")
associated with Case Nos. SUB2008-00001 and ZON2008-00074 thru -00078 (General
Plan Amendment, Coastal Specific Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Vesting Tentative
Parcel Map, Variance, Grading Permit, Height Variations, and Coastal Permit).
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 2nd day of February 2010.
ayor
ATTEST: - V
C�
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )ss
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES )
I, Carla Morreale, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, hereby certify that the
above Resolution No. 2010-08 was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said
City Council at a regular meeting held on February 2, 2010.
City Clerk
1202733
Resolution No. 2010-08
Page 5
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Project: Case Nos. SUB2008-00001 and ZON2008-00074 thru -00078, a General Plan
Amendment, Coastal Specific Plan Amendment, Zone Change;Vesting Parcel
Map, Variance, Grading Permit, Height Variation, and Coastal Permit.
Location: Vacant Lot located at 32639 Nantasket Drive, on the west side of Nantasket
Drive, between Beachview Drive and Seacove Drive in the City's Coastal Zone
(APN7573-014-013), Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
Applicant: Dana Ireland, 1 Seacove Drive, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
Landowner: Same.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction.................................................................................................2
Purpose.........................................................................................................2
Environmental Procedures.............................................................................2
Mitigation Monitoring Program Requirements.....................................................2
II. Management of the Mitigation Monitoring Program..............................................3
Rolesand Responsibilities..............................................................................3
Mitigation and Monitoring Program Procedures...................................................3
Mitigation Monitoring Operations......................................................................3
III. Mitigation Monitoring Program Checklist............................................................4
IV. Mitigation Monitoring Summary Table................................................................5
Pagel Mitigation Monitoring Program
Resolution No. 2010-08
I. INTRODUCTION
PURPOSE
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) is to allow the following project on a vacant lot
located at 32639 Nantasket Drive, which is on the west side of Nantasket Drive, between
Beachview Drive and Seacove Drive in the City's Coastal Zone(APN7573-014-013), in the City
of Rancho Palos Verdes:
A General Plan Amendment to change the Land Use Designa-fion from Commercial
Recreational to Residential (2-4 d.u./ac); a Coastal Specific Plan Amendment to change
the Coastal Specific Plan Land Use Designation from Agriculture to Residential; a Zone
Change from CR to RS-3 (Single-Family Residential); a Vesting Parcel Map for a 4-lot
subdivision; a Variance to allow the RS-3 zoned lots to maintain a lot depth of 93'; a
Grading Permit for a total of 4,028 cubic yards of grading to fadilitate the construction of
the four new single-family residences; Height Variation applications for the new single-
family residences on Lots 3 and 4 that exceed the 16-foot height limit; and, a Coastal
Permit for the development project within the City's Coastal Zone.
The MMP responds to Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code,which requires a lead or
responsible agency that approves or carries out a project where a Mitigated Negative
Declaration has identified significant environmental effects, to adopt a "reporting or monitoring
program for adopted or required changes to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects."
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes is acting as lead agency for the project.
An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared to address the potential
environmental impacts of the project. Where appropriate, this environmental document
recommended mitigation measures to mitigate or avoid impacts identified. Consistent with
Section 21080 (2)(c)of the Public Resources Code, a mitigation reporting or monitoring program
is required to ensure that the adopted mitigation measures under the jurisdiction of the City are
implemented. The City will adopt this MMP when adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROCEDURES
This MMP has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970 (CEQA), as amended (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the State
Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA (CEQA Guidelines), as amended (California
Administrative Code Section 15000 et seq.). This MMP complies with the rules, regulations, and
procedures adopted by the City of Rancho Palos Verdes for implementation of CEQA.
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code states: "When making the findings required by
subdivision (a)of Section 21081 or when adopting a negative declaration pursuant to paragraph
(2) of subdivision (c) of Section 21081, the public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring
program for the changes to the project which it has adopted or made a condition of project
approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or
monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. For
those changes which have been required or incorporated into the project at the request of an
agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the project, that agency
Page 2 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Resolution No. 2010-08
shall, if so requested by the lead or responsible agency, prepare and submit a proposed
reporting or monitoring program."
II. MANAGEMENT OF THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The MMP for the project will be in place through all phases of the project including final design,
pre-grading, construction, and operation. The City will have the primary enforcement role for the
mitigation measures.
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM PROCEDURES
The mitigation monitoring procedures for this MMP consists of, filing requirements, and
compliance verification. The Mitigation Monitoring Checklist and procedures for its use are
outlined below.
Mitigation Monitoring Program Checklist
The MMP Checklist provides a comprehensive list of the required mitigation measures. In
addition, the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist includes: the implementing action when the
mitigation measure will occur;the method of verification of compliance;the timing of verification;
the department or agency responsible for implementing the mitigation measures; and
compliance verification. Section III provides the MMP Checklist.
Mitigation Monitoring Program Files
Files shall be established to document and retain the records of this MMP. The files shall be
established, organized, and retained by the City of Rancho Palos Verdes department of
Planning, Building, and Code Enforcement.
Compliance Verification
The MMP Checklist shall be signed when compliance of the mitigation measure is met
according to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Director of Planning, Building, and Code
Enforcement. The compliance verification section of the MMP Checklist shall be signed, for
mitigation measures requiring ongoing monitoring, and when the monitoring of a mitigation
measure is completed.
MITIGATION MONITORING OPERATIONS
The following steps shall be followed for implementation, monitoring, and verification of each
mitigation measure:
1. The City of Rancho Palos Verdes, Director of Planning, Building, and Code Enforcement
shall designate a party responsible for monitoring of the mitigation measures.
Page 3 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Resolution No. 2010-08
2. The City of Rancho Palos Verdes, Director of Planning, Building, and Code Enforcement
shall provide to the party responsible for the monitoring of a given mitigation measure, a
copy of the MMP Checklist indicating the mitigation measures for which the person is
responsible and other pertinent information.
3. The party responsible for monitoring shall then verify compliance and sign the
Compliance Verification column of the MMP Checklist for the appropriate mitigation
measures.
Mitigation measures shall be implemented as specified by the MMP Checklist. During any
project phase, unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of
mitigation measures. The City of Rancho Palos Verdes, Director of Planning, Building, and
Code Enforcement with advice from Staff or another City department, is responsible for
recommending changes to the mitigation measures, if needed. If mitigation measures are
refined,the Director of Planning, Building, and Code Enforcement would document the change
and shall notify the appropriate design, construction, or operations personnel about refined
requirements.
III. MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM CHECKLIST
INTRODUCTION
This section provides the MMP Checklist for the project as approved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes on December 11, 2008. Mitigation measures
are listed in the order in which they appear in the Initial Study.
Types of measures are project design, construction, operational, or cumulative.
Time of Implementation indicates when the measure is to be implemented.
Responsible Entity indicates who is responsible for implementation.
Compliance Verification provides space for future reference and notation that
compliance has been monitored, verified, and is consistent with these mitigation
measures.
Page 4 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Resolution No. 2010-08
MITIGATION MEASURES TYPE TIME OF RESPONSIBLE COMPLIANCE
IMPLEMENTATION ENTITY VERIFICATION
.......................................................................................... ..... ........
.............................................................................................. .. .... ...........
..........
........... .............
............ ................... ........... ...... .......
..............
..........
............ ........................... .......... ...............
...... ....... ............
............ ............... ......... .............. .................
..................... .................. . -, .:�...... ............ .......
:X............. .......................... ...........
.......... ................. . .......
...... ........
........... .................. .... ... ...
............
.... ............... .......
............... ..........
........... ..........
............. ...... . ........ . ...
..........
.............
............ ..........
........... ....... .......................
...........
............. ........
...... ....
.......................
..........
..............
.................
...........
A T "O.K.I...
........... ..................... ................................... ............
...................
........... ...........................
.. ........... .............. ...... ..........
A-1:Exterior residential lighting shall be in compliance
with the standards of Section 17.56.030 of the Rancho
Palos Verdes Development Code. No outdoor I ighting b
is permitted where the light source is directed toward Project Design Prior to building permit final, Property Owner Department of
or results in direct illumination of a parcel of property Operational and on-going applicant. Planning, Building and
or properties other than upon which such light is Code Enforcement.
physically located.
.................................... .......................
. .........-............ .................................
. ........... .............. ........:.. ............................ ......... ........... ..................... ............
....................... ......... ...... .....
..................................... .......... .................
.................... ...................... I...,."....-..,.."..:-.,-,.,.,.,....-,�................................ ............... .....
--- ........................... . . ..................... . ....................
........................ ......................... ............
......... ..............................................................
. . .................................................................................. ...........
......................................................
............................................
. ...............................- : .........
... ... ................................................................................ .... ....................... .......
. .................................................. .........
.............................
................................................................................. ....................
1.-........... .........
.......................... ............
...... ...... ....
.................................. .
. .......................................... ............... ......................
..................... ..................................................................
.. ................................................................................... ...........
.1.......................................
... .................................................................................. ..........
....................................................................................
............................................................... ............ ........................
................................... .............
.......................... . ............
............
.............................................................. . ....
.. :........ ...
.. ..................................f................................ .. .....
..........
.....................................................................................
..........................................
...............
... ...................... ................................................... ...... ..
................................................................
.................. .......................................................... ............
..........
.................................................................... .............. ......... ................. . ..........
........................... .......
.. . ........ .................................................................................
A . ............ ........ .........................
............................................................................... ....................... ---------- .. .............. .. ... ............
AQ-1: During construction the owner shall ensure that
the unpaved construction areas are watered at least
twice a day during excavation and construction to Property Owner Department of
reduce dust emissions and meet SCAQMD Rule 403 Construction On-going during construction Applicant Planning, Building and
which prohibits dust clouds to be visible beyond the Code Enforcement.
project site boundaries.
AQ-2: During construction the owner shall ensure that
all clearing, grading, earth moving or demolition Department of
activities shall be discontinued during periods of high Construction On-going during construction Property Owner Planning, Building and
winds (i.e., greater than 30 mph), so as to prevent Applicant Code Enforcement.
excessive amounts of dust.
AQ-3: During construction of any improvements
associated with the subdivision,the owner shall ensure Property Owner Department of
that General contractors shall maintain and operate Construction On-going during construction Applicant Planning, Building and
construction equipment so as to minimize exhaust Code Enforcement.
emissions.
AQ-4: A weatherproof notice/sign setting forth the
name of the person(s)responsible for the construction
site and a phone number(s) to be called in the event Property Owner Department of
that dust is visible from the site as described in Construction On-going during construction Applicant Planning, Building and
mitigation measure AQ-1 above, shall be posted and Code Enforcement.
prominently displayed on the' construction fencing.
Page 5 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Resolution No. 2010-08
MITIGATION MEASURES TYPE TIME OF RESPONSIBLE COMPLIANCE
IMPLEMENTATION ENTITY VERIFICATION
................ ....................................... ...............
...............
............ ............
.. .........
.................................. .................
...........
............
..... .. .
...........................
......... .................................. ............
LTU-1111 xx:K%*:�, ............
...........
J�
........ ........ .... ........ .........
.............................................. ..........
CR-1: Prior to the commencement of grading, the
applicant shall retain a qualified paleontologist and
archeologist to monitor grading and excavation. Inthe
event undetected buried cultural resources are Prior to issuance of building Property Owner Department of
encountered during grading and excavation,work shall Construction and/or grading permit Applicant Planning, Building and
be halted or diverted from the resource area and the Code Enforcement
archeologist and/or paleontologist shall evaluate the
remains and propose appropriate mitigation measures.
........ ........
............ ..........:.......... ....... .......... ........................... .................... ........... ...................... .............. ............ ....................... ..................I.................... ... .....
................. .............. .... ................ .....................
............... .... ................................. ............ .. ..... . ............ .......... ...... ......
... ............. ......................... ....... ....................
..............
............................
.............. .............' ,''
.... ..................................
..........
......... .... ........
....... ................
............................. ...........
......................... ........
......... ......... .........
_M .......... ............
................. ......... .......................... ............. ................... .................
.1...............
.......................
................ ........ ...........
............. .......... ............................ ..........:I.:....:..:.":":...:...,:.....,.... .. -.11 1 1..... ..............
"N .............
............
.................... ........... ..
............. .... .............................. ................
........... ..............
.........: ...... ....... ..........
.................................
..................................
...................................................
........................................
..........
....................... ... ................ .........
. ..........
...............
.............
............... . ......... .........
0 .................
................. ................. ...........
.... .... .
...... ..................
.............. ..................................... ...................... F. ........................
..........
GEO-1: The applicant shall ensure that all applicable Department of
conditions as specified within the geotechnical report Construction Prior to issuance of building Property Owner Planning, Building and
and all measures required by the City Geologist are and/or grading permit. applicant. Code Enforcement.
incorporated into the project.
GEO-2: Prior to building permit issuance,the applicant
shall prepare an erosion control plan for the review and
approval of the Building Official. The applicant shall be Prior to issuance of building Property Owner Department of
responsible for continuous and effective Construction and/or grading permit. applicant. Planning, Building and
implementation of the erosion control plan during Code Enforcement.
project construction.
.......................... .............
....................................................... ............................................ ....................................................... ................................. .............................. . ............_.'..............
.................. .................. .............. .. .............
.................
.......... .. ......................... ............. ............
.............. ..................... ....................... ............ .......... ....................... ................ .... .........
:: .................. .......... ............. ...........
..............
................ ....... ......... ......... ...... ............ . ....
......... ........ ..........
......................
............. .......... .............. .................:: ..........
............................................ ................................ .............. ............ .............. .. ....................... . ...........................
. . . . .........e...1.: "..I.::.::
............... :... .. ............ ............... _X___ _I.....":.. - ... ... __............
. .........6, .. ......... ......... ..
........... .........
.......... .................
... .......--.1-1-..... ....... ................. .. .......... .......
........................ ...........
.. .............
............. .......................... ............................ ............. ............ ........... ..............
. .. .......... ............... ... ....
..................
............. ............ ......
................. .............. ...................
.... ........ ...........
............ ..... ............. ........... I....,..................................
........................
.........
..........
....................
............ .......................
............................... .............. .............. ..........
.............................. . ............................ ........... .............................
AL .I................ .. .................... ............-.....,...:...1............
WX ..t U�
................. .............
........... ....................... .......... .....- ............. ........... .... ........ ........... .......................
.............. ................................................................ ........................................................... . ................. ................................. ...
HWQ-1: Subject to review and approval of the City
Public Works and Building and Safety Departments and
prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project Publ;c Works
applicant shall submit a storm water management plan Department, and
which shows the on-site and off-site storm water Project Design Prior to issuance of building Property Owner the Department of
conveyance systems that will be constructed by the and/or grading permit. applicant. Planning, Building and
project proponent for the purpose of safely conveying Code Enforcement.
storm water off the project site. These drainage
s ruc ures shall be designed in accordance with the
most current standards and criteria of the City Engineer I
Page 6 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Resolution No. 2010-08
MITIGATION MEASURES TYPE TIME OF RESPONSIBLE COMPLIANCE
IMPLEMENTATION ENTITY VERIFICATION
and Los Angeles County Department of Public Works to
ensure that adequate drainage capacity is maintained.
The plan shall also show whether existing storm water
facilities off the site are adequate to convey storm flows
and what additional improvements to these existing
facilities are required by the project applicant to ensure
these facilities will be adequate to meet the needs of
this project.Prior to the issuance of any building permits
for any of the proposed residences, the project
applicant shall install/improve such facilities to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and the City
Building Official.
HWQ-2: The project shall comply with the requirements
of the statewide National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System(NPDES)General Permit for Storm Project design Department of
Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity and On-going Property Owner/ Planning, Building and
to prevent storm water pollution from impacting waters applicant
p p P g operational Code Enforcement
of the U.S. in the vicinity of the project site.
HWQ-3: In accordance with the Clean Water Act, the
project applicant shall coordinate with the Regional
Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) regarding the
of
required National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Prior to building and/or Property Owner/ Department it
System NPDES permit for the project. The project Project design Planning, Building and
Y ( ) P p J P J grading permit issuance applicant
applicant shall obtain this permit and provide the City Code Enforcement
with proof of the permit before any site grading begins.
HWQ-4: Appropriate Best Management Practices
(BMP),including sandbags shall be used by the project
applicant to help control runoff from the project site Department of
during project construction activities. Measures to be Construction On-going during construction Property Owner/applicant Planning, Building and
used shall be approved by the City Engineer before a Code Enforcement
Grading Permit is issued for the project.
Page 7 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Resolution No. 2010-08
MITIGATION MEASURES TYPE TIME OF RESPONSIBLE COMPLIANCE
IMPLEMENTATION ENTITY VERIFICATION
.......... ..................................... .......................................
......... ........... .......... ... ............... ...........................
................ ................. ............................... ........... ........ ............ ...........
........... ........... ........
: :.:..::. * ::, "... "N's.":......................
........... . .......... -i.... ..............
......... ......
.........................................
................................. .................
... ....... . . ..................................
..........
...........
i...,. ......... ...
...........
.................................................................................. ..... .. .......
N-1: Demolition, grading and construction activities Department of
shall be limited to the hours of 7:00arn and 7:00pm, Construction On-going. Property Owner Planning, Building and
Monday through Saturday. There shall be no applicant. Code Enforcement.
construction on Sundays or federally observed holidays.
N-2: During demolition, construction and/or grading
operations, trucks shall not park, queue and/or idle at Department of
the project site or in the adjoining public rights-of-way Construction On-going. Property Owner Planning, Building and
before 7:00 AM, Monday through Saturday, in applicant code Enforcement.
accordance with the permitted hours of construction
stated above.
................................. .......... ................ ............ . ......... ....... ............
................ ............ .......... ...... ....... .............
................................ ............. ................................... ............. ....... ......
...... . ..... .................................................
............
............... ...... ...... .........
............... ...........
.......... ...........
...................
............
...........
............... ................
........... ..........
..............
............................
........... ......
........... .......................
...............
.................... ......
. ..... ........ .........
..........................
................. .......... ......
...................
........................
............
.................................................... ...........
............ .......... ............... . .........
......... . ......
.. .....................
................... . ...... ...........
USLICISSM.C... . ........ ........
. .......... ................... .............................. . ...................................
............ ....................... ............... ................ ..................
PS-1: As there is no park or recreational facility
designated in the general plan to be located in whole or
in part within the proposed subdivision to serve the Department of
immediate and future needs of the residents of the Project Design Prior to Recordation of Final Property Owner Planning, Building and
subdivision, the project applicant shall, in lieu of Map applicant Code Enforcement.
dedicating land, pay a fee equal to the value of the land
prescribed for dedication in Section 16.20.100.0 and in
an amount determined in accordance with the
provisions of Section 16.20.100.G.
................................................. .......... ... .......................... ........ ............ ...................................................... ......................... .......................... .............
............ .......... .................. ............ ............. .................... ............ .............. ......................
.................... .........
.............. ........ .......... ..........
..................
.......... .. .... ..........
...............
............................ ...................... ..................
............ .................. ..............................
.. .........
...........
-XI ...... .... ....... .......... ............
......... ......
.............
...........
... .......... WX
............ ..........
. ........... .. . .....................
........... ........ ................... ..........
.............. .........
............ ..................................
...........
......... .................. ................... ........... ........... ... ........
F ........... ........... ......... ...........
..................... ..................
.......... .............
................. .......................... ............ ................... ................. ........................................ ..............
............................... ...........
...................... ................................ ...... ............................................. ......... ...... ............
............... ............... ................... ...........
T-1: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the Public Works
project,the project applicant shall prepare a haul route Department, and
plan for approval by the City's Public Works Construction Prior to building and/or Property Owner the Department of
Department.The project applicant shall also be required grading permit issuance applicant. Planning, Building and
0 pos a bond with the City in an amount determined by Code Enforcement.
the Public Works Department that will provide for the
Page 8 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Resolution No. 2010-08
MITIGATION MEASURES TYPE TIME OF RESPONSIBLE COMPLIANCE
IMPLEMENTATION ENTITY VERIFICATION
repair of City streets damaged by the hauling of soil
away from the project site.
Page 9 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Resolution No. 2010-08