CC SR 20170620 08 - Civic Center Master Plan Status ReportRANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 06/20/2017
AGENDA REPORT AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action to receive and file a status report on the Civic Center
Master Plan process
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
(1) Receive and file a status report on the Civic Center Master Plan process.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Amount Budgeted: N/A
Additional Appropriation: N/A
Account Number(s): N/A
ORIGINATED BY: Kit Fox, AICP, Senior Administrative Analyst:;
Matt Waters, Senior Administrative Analyst
REVIEWED BY: Gabriella Yap, Deputy City Manager; -
APPROVED BY: Doug Willmore, City Manager
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: ✓�'�
A. 2008 Phase 1 study summary (page A-1)
B. 2010 Phase 1 study summary (page B-1)
C. Program of Utilization (page C-1)
D. Diagram of proposed POU boundary adjustment (D-1)
E. Diagram of Coast Guard property (page E-1)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On March 7, 2017, Staff presented preliminary results of the Civic Center Master Plan
survey to the City Council. At this meeting, the City Council directed Staff to recruit
members of the new Civic Center Advisory Committee. The recruitment closed on April
14, 2017, and the City Council has conducted interviews with interested candidates
since May. As a separate matter on tonight's agendas, the City Council was asked to
adopt a resolution forming the Civic Center Advisory Committee, which Staff anticipates
will begin meeting this August. Staff also wished to take this opportunity to provide the
City Council with an update on land use and jurisdiction issues related to the Civic
Center Master Plan process.
1
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
Survey Results and Analysis
The City Council approved the Civic Center Master Plan survey on November 15, 2016,
to elicit feedback on potential elements that could be included on the City Hall site from
a wide range of residents. The central focus of the Master Plan process is on
developing elements for Rancho Palos Verdes residents' use, and not on any elements
that would act as a regional draw. A total of 13,595 surveys were mailed out to all
Rancho Palos Verdes residences in late December 2016. Of these, 2,295 completed
surveys were returned to the City, a 17% return rate that is well above industry
standards for a direct-mail campaign.
Analysis of Survey Responses
The survey consisted of four parts:
1. One question asking if respondents favored or opposed developing a civic center
site.
2. 21 questions about individual potential Civic Center elements.
3. Open-ended short answer sections asking for a) additional ideas or uses that the
respondent supported; b) comments regarding the current or future use of Point
Vicente Park/Civic Center; and c) ways the City could better service the residents
of Rancho Palos Verdes in general.
4. Optional demographic section.
The charts below summarize the responses to the first two portions of the survey: level
of support for or opposition to civic center development, and level of support for or
opposition to possible civic center components.
Favor vs. Oppose Redeveloping the Civic Center Site
775,41%
313,17%
174,9%
33%
■ 1 - Strongly Oppose 2 - Somewhat Oppose ■ 3 - Somewhat Favor ■ 4 - Strongly Favor
2
Average Score for Elements (excludes those with
No Opinion)
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
°o
a
°o
a
o
CJ
E
0
o
U
a
ao
a
a
d
o
2"5m
—
°
3
Y -
~
+W+
C6
Vt
bIJ
i
bD
V1
°c°
O
N
`-
W
U
°u
N
U
Y
Q
No
c
Q
o
M_
c_�
3
v
u v
L'
a�
v
ai
E
ami
E
c°
d
3
v
7 c
>
_
to
3
y,
_Q
Y
VI(6
fl_
O
C
N
d
aJ
Y
E
t
d m
M
M
o
ro
o
o
E—_
`o
ow
E
2
o
3
0
U
^
o
tX0
°�
•3 v
M
GO
O
'O
'6
d
°
L
*'
a)
U_
C
�n Q
O
_
N
E
7
N
_Q
a
°
r6V
to
OY
G
G
Y
dQ
cc
G
—
w
E
H
Q
>
O
aJ
Y
Survey respondents favored development of the civic center site by a margin of 74% to
26%. High-ranking civic center components (scoring 3 out of 5 or higher) included
trailheads, public safety elements, a village green, shade structures and a community
center.
Open -Ended Questions
There was significant overlap in responses to the different open-ended questions,
especially with regard to existing and potential uses for the site. The general categories
upon which respondents focused their responses included.
• View, lighting, noise and traffic concerns
• Senior programming issues, particularly a senior center
• Resident use only, or primarily resident use
• Financial concerns, no increase of taxes
• Safety concerns
• Maintaining open space
• Customer service requests or concerns (Staff has either followed up on these
requests/concerns or is in the process of doing so)
• Positive opinions on proposed uses in survey
• Negative opinions on negative uses in survey
• Concerns about location of potential developments
• Leave things as they are
3
Parking issues
Ideas for new potential elements
Negative and positive opinions on items in survey
Staff is currently reviewing and categorizing all of the responses to these open-ended
questions. A thorough analysis and breakdown of these results will be provided to the
Civic Center Advisory Committee once it begins to meet later this summer.
Civic Center Advisory Committee
As a separate matter on tonight's agenda, the City Council was asked to adopt a
resolution forming the Civic Center Advisory Committee. The City Council is expected
to complete its interviews of the twenty-three (23) candidates at the August 1, 2017, City
Council meeting. Staff expects the first meeting of the Committee to occur in late
August, and for the Committee to prepare its work plan for the City Council's review and
approval by late summer or early fall.
Land Use and Jurisdictional Issues
There are a number of land use and jurisdictional issues with the civic center site that
Staff has been working to address. Many of these are related to the Program of
Utilization (POU) and the former use of the property as a missile base.
Previous Environmental Investigations
In 2008 and 2010, Staff commissioned Phase 1 Site Assessments for the civic center
site. The summaries of these reports are attached (Attachments A & B), and the
complete reports are available on the City's website at the following link:
http://www. rp vca. go v/1017/Baseline-Studies
The 2008 Phase 1 study (Attachment A) studied both Upper and Lower Point Vicente.
At the former Nike Missile Facility Site, two (2) "anomalies" that were identified and
suspected of being abandoned underground storage tanks (USTs). The consultant
recommended excavating these suspected USTs and also testing for the presence of
pesticides and herbicides at the site of the current Hatano farm. The consultant also
recommended additional sampling for heavy metals that had been identified observed in
borings on the former Nike Missile Facility. However, it is important to note that the
USTs and Nike Missile Facility are located on a portion of the property that the City
already controls and may not be impacted depending on what that land will be used for.
Additionally, Hatano farm is not located in an area that is currently proposed for
inclusion on the Civic Center Master Plan. These are issues that Staff and the Civic
Center Advisory Committee will need to study further as a part of the Civic Center
Master Plan process.
El
The 2010 Phase 1 study (Attachment B) does not identify any recognized environmental
conditions (RECs) on the civic center site. Although the physical scope of the 2010
study was more limited than the 2008 study (which included a portion of Lower Point
Vicente), it is not clear why or how the same consultant found no RECs in 2010. Staff is
not aware of any remedial actions that would have resolved these issues in the period
between the two Phase 1 studies.
In addition, in March 2017and in response to concerns that there were polychlorinated
biphenyl (PCB) contaminants in the missile silos, the City had the site tested. Surface
samples were collected by Ellis Environmental Management, the company who
previously removed asbestos, airborne mold, and lead materials from the silos. Reports
indicated that surface PCB concentrations were at a level that was designated as
"clean" for unrestricted access on indoor solid surfaces. However, based on the age of
the facility and its original use, any oil -containing elevator, electrical, and/or other
equipment should be assumed to be PCB -containing and tested prior to transport and
disposal.
Program of Utilization
As the City Council is aware, the NPS maintains that the use of a substantial portion of
the civic center site is restricted to outdoor passive recreational activities under the
terms of the POU (Attachment C). An irregularly-shaped 7.66 -acre portion of the site is
the only property that the City owns "free and clear" without encumbrances imposed by
the POU. In 2014, Staff first approached the National Park Service (NPS) about the
possibility of adjusting the boundary of the POU so that the City would have the ability to
redevelop it into a more regularly -shaped, contiguous portion of the civic center site.
With the assistance of the City's Federal lobbyist, this proposal has been refined to give
the City full control of the portions of the civic center site that currently include the
Peninsula Seniors' trailers, the emergency helipad and the overflow parking area—all of
these are currently subject to the POU (Attachment D).
NPS has recently conceded that many of the possible components of a Civic Center
Master Plan are consistent with the POU. NPS continues to maintain that the City
should purchase additional, undeveloped land elsewhere in the City in order to "convert"
portions of the civic center site to uses that NPS claims are inconsistent with the POU.
As the City Council will recall, this was the same argument raised by NPS several years
ago regarding the transfer of the lease for the Hatano farm.
Staff and the City's Federal lobbyist are currently working this issue on two (2) fronts:
regulatory and legislative. First, we have pressed NPS to justify its position that a
property conversion is necessary to amend the POU boundary, and that the City has to
purchase additional, undeveloped property as a "replacement" for the converted
property, rather than being able to use undeveloped property that the City already owns
(such as in the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve) to satisfy this requirement.
��
Second, Staff and City Attorney's Office have not been satisfied with NPS' response
regarding usage of the property. Staff believes that public safety falls within the use
guidelines for maintenance, and the City Attorney's Office review supports the Staff's
view. The Sheriff's Department is the enforcement arm in the Preserve, and has
effectively taken the place of the Mountains and Recreation and Conservation Authority
(MRCA) and rangers, while the Fire Department is protecting this very high fire hazard
area.
Third, in parallel, we have built support for a legislative solution that would allow the
POU boundary to be amended as a matter of law.
Acquisition of Coast Guard Property
The civic center site surrounds Battery 240, a 4'/z -acre parcel that includes the remains
of WWII -era artillery emplacements and an underground bunker (Attachment E). The
property is owned and controlled by the United States Coast Guard. The Coast Guard
had previously planned to surplus the property in the early 2000s, but chose not to
proceed with disposal after the September 11th terrorist attacks in 2001.
Acquiring the Coast Guard property for inclusion in the civic center site would eliminate
the "doughnut hole" of Federal property that is currently surrounding by City property. In
2016, Staff contacted the Coast Guard about the possibility of the City acquiring this
property. We've been informed that the Coast Guard is recommending the property for
divestiture, which is currently being evaluated awaiting a decision from Coast Guard's
property division.
Public Safety and First Responders' Joint Use
At the January 19, 2016, Council meeting, during discussion of the Public Safety
Strategic Plan and creating a Sheriff's substation at the civic center site, the City
Council directed then -Captain Blaine Bolin to provide specific requirements that the Los
Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD) would need at this site. On December 20,
2016, the City Council expressed support for a fire station to be located at the civic
center site. Staff has had preliminary discussions with both the Los Angeles County Fire
Department (LACoFD) and the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD) about
including public safety facilities as a part of the Civic Center Master Plan.
The facilities planning staff from both LASD and LACoFD have been extremely helpful,
providing City Staff with general plans and footprint requirements. LACoFD has
expressed interest in the possibility of replacing Fire Station No. 53 with a larger, more
modern station on the civic center site. This would also potentially create an additional
space at the existing Fire Station No. 53 for the ambulance service to stage.
Upgrading the helipad and creating a joint Emergency Operations Center (EOC) are
also vital components of the Civic Center. LACoFD and LASD have both unequivocally
stated the importance of a helipad in this region to assist with fire suppression and law
on
enforcement services. An EOC is a necessity for the City to continue operations during
a large-scale disaster. The current EOC, located in the City Hall Community Room, is
not sufficiently large enough to handle City Staff and law enforcement together if
needed, and is located on the ground floor of a building that is not seismically sound.
Other Joint Use Possibilities
In addition to public safety users, Staff has been approached by other entities with an
interest in possible joint use of the civic center site:
• Terranea Resort: For the past few years, the resort has increasingly relied upon the
overflow parking lot at the civic center site to accommodate its employees during
large events. The resort has also indicated that it would like to continue joint parking
opportunities, if possible.
• Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy: The Conservancy has also expressed
interest in having offices and other facilities (such as its native plant garden) at a
location that is closer to the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. The establishment of
Conservancy headquarters at the civic center site might also help establish the
property as the gateway to the Preserve, thereby reducing pressure upon the
neighborhoods surrounding existing gateways such as Del Cerro Park.
• Trailhead with Public Parking. Another joint use that received tremendous support in
the survey is a trailhead with public parking. There are thousands of hikers that use
the trails in the City each week, and creating a trailhead with parking here at City
Hall would help alleviate the pressures placed on the Del Cerro Park neighborhood.
Financing
There are myriad ways to fund a new Civic Center. Once the scope of the project has
been determined, options will be presented to the City Council for consideration. The
City may want to consider the possibility of a public-private partnership (P3) with Lowe
Development or other qualified development partners. This type of financing has
proven to be successful in many cities, as we have seen recently:
• Long Beach Civic Center
• Long Beach Courthouse
• Berkeley City Hall Complex
• Rialto Water & Wastewater System
• Dana Point Harbor Revitalization
• Angel's Flight Railway
• LAX Consolidated Rent-A-Car Center
The benefits can include providing greater access to capital to fund the construction of
the project, potential significant cost savings, and increased payments options.
7
Phase I Environmental
Site Assessment Report
511
Upper and Lower Pointe Vicente
30940 Hawthorne Boulevard
Rancho Palos Verdes, California
90275
Prepared For:
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Boulevard
Rancho Palos Verdes, California
90275
Prepared By:
Professional Service Industries, Inc.
3960 Gilman Street
Long Beach, California 90815
PSI Project No.
559-8E052
Report Date: 12/03/2008
R t. i Infas��atiaf t
,TbBuild On
Engineering • consutdng • Testing
A-1
Report of Phase i Environmental Site Assessment 1210312008
PSI Project 559-8E052
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GeneralInformation........................................................................................................1
1 Findings and Conclusions..........................................................................................2
1.1 Phase I ESA.....................................................................................................3
1.2 Recommendations...........................................................................................4
2 Introduction..................................................................................................................
5
2.1 Contract...........................................................................................................
5
2.2 Purpose of Services.........................................................................................5
2.3 Standard of Care and Warranties.....................................................................5
2.4 Reliance........................................................................................................... 6
2.5 Use By Other Parties.......................................................................................
6
3 Phase I ESA Scope and Methodology....................................................................... 7
3.1 Phase I ESA.....................................................................................................7
3.2 Limitations, Exceptions, Deviations and Data Gap ..........................................
9
3.3 Significant Assumptions................................................................................. 9
4 User -Provided Information........................................................................................11
4.1 User's Responsibilities...................................................................................11
4.2 Suggested Information...................................................................................11
4.3 Helpful Documents.........................................................................................11
4.4 Proceedings...................................................................................................12
5 Subject Property Usage................................................................... ...........13
5.1 Physical Setting..............................................................................................13
5.2 Description and Current Uses........................................................................13
5.3 Past Uses.......................................................................................................16
6 Adjoining and Surrounding Property Usage...........................................................17
6.1 Description and Current Uses........................................................................17
6.2 Past Uses.......................................................................................................19
7 Environmental Regulatory Records Review............................................................21
7.1 Database Findings.........................................................................................21
7.2 Other Regulatory Information.........................................................................22
8 Interviews...................................................................................................................
24
A-2
Report of Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 559-BE052
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Appendices
Figures
Photographs
Environmental Database Report
Lien/Activity Use Limitation Documentation
Historical Research Documentation
Interview Documentation
Data Gap Worksheet
Personnel Qualifications
92/03/2008
A-3
Report of Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 559-8E052
GENERAL INFORMATION
Project Information:
559-8E052 - Pointe Vicente - Rancho Palos Verdes
Project Number: 559-8E052
Consultant Information:
Professional Service Industries, Inc.
3960 Gilman Street
Long Beach, California 90815
Phone: 562.597.3977
Fax: 562.597.8459
E-mail Address: chris.schell@psiusa.com
Inspection Date: 11/05/2008
Report Date: 12/03/2008
Site Assessor:
Environmental Professional:
Principal Consultant:
Certifications:
1210312008
Site Information:
Upper and Lower Pointe Vicente
30940 Hawthorne Boulevard
Rancho Palos Verdes, California 90275
Latitude, Longitude: 33.746400, -118.404000
Site Access Contact: Jonathan Braatvedt
Client Information:
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Mr. Jonathan Braatvedt
30940 Hawthorne Boulevard
Rancho Palos Verdes, California 90275
Contract/Proposal#: 559-8E0118
Authorization Date: 10/27/2008
Authorization Party: Jonathan Braatvedt
Chris Schell
Environmental Assessor
Frank R. Poss
Department Manager
Frank R. Poss
Department Manager
1 declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental
Professional as defined in 312.10 of this part. I have the specific qualifications based on education,
training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. I
have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and
practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312.
Frank R. Poss - Department Manager
WE
Report of Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment 12/03!2008
PSI Project 559-8E052
I FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) performed a Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment (Phase I ESA) of the property at 30940 Hawthorne Boulevard, Rancho Palos
Verdes, California 90275. The assessment included a Phase I ESA. PSI performed the
assessment to comply with the contract between City of Rancho Palos Verdes and PSI. The
report should be read in its entirety to obtain a more complete understanding of the information
provided and to aid in any decisions made or actions taken based on this information.
The subject property is comprised of a portion of the approximate 78 acre Upper Pointe
Vicente area located south of Hawthorne Boulevard and east of Palos Drive North, and
approximately 5.5 acres of active farmland identified as part of Lower Pointe Vicente located
southwest of Palos Verdes Drive North. Included in the Upper Pointe Vicente area is the City
Hall, which held the offices and barracks associated with the former Nike Missile base; asphalt
parking area and access road; the former Nike Missile silos; launch pad, three out -buildings
(the cable Building, generator building, and maintenance building utilized by the City of Rancho
Palos Verdes Department of Public Works); the Pointe Vicente Battery #240 gun
emplacement; a tennis court; and a vacant area of land to the northeast of the former Nike
Missile silos.
The Upper Pointe Vicente portion of the subject property was undeveloped land until the
construction of the Nike Missile Facility in the early 1950s. Throughout the 1950's and 1960's,
the Nike Missile Facility was home to the administration and launch facilities for both the Nike
Ajax and Nike Hercules anti-aircraft missiles. It was designated as Los Angeles Defense Area
(LADA) #55, a part of the air defense system of Los Angeles. The Nike defense system
operated until approximately 1974. The former Nike Missile Facility is currently owned by the
City of Rancho Palos Verdes and is used as a storage area for the Public Works Department.
During the Site Investigation of the former Nike Missile Site conducted by PSI in September
2005 two notable anomalies (Anomaly 1 and 2) were identified by the geophysical survey,
which were located to the north of the maintenance building (former fueling building). These
anomalies were highly suggestive of USTs. Anomaly 1 is suggestive of one large UST.
However, it is possible that it is actually two smaller adjacent USTs. Three suspect vent lines
were identified (two originating from Anomaly 1 and one originating from Anomaly 2), which
connected to three suspect aboveground vent pipes located approximately 10 feet north of the
maintenance building. A suspect product piping line was identified which originated from
Anomaly 1 and terminated in the concrete missile launch pad. Based on findings of the
geophysical survey and the historical information provided to PSI regarding operations at the
Former Nike Missile Facility, PSI believes Anomalies 1 and 2 represent three petroleum USTs
that have been abandoned in place. The presence of the USTs represents a recognized
environmental condition in connection with the subject property.
PSI did not observe significant changes in the area of the three USTs during the site
reconnaissance on November 5, 2008, indicating that the USTs have not been removed. PSI
recommends excavation of the suspect USTs (Anomalies 1 and 2) and related product piping
lines identified in the Geophysical Survey, The USTs should be closed in accordance with Los
Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) UST closure requirements.
According to historical aerial photographs, the vacant land at the northeast corner of the
subject property and the approximate 5.5 acre piece of land that is part of Lower Pointe
Vicente was historically used as agriculture since at least 1956. The land located within Lower
Pointe Vicente is still active farmland today. Agricultural chemicals including pesticides and or
herbicides have likely been used over the years to improve productivity. Many of the pesticides
and herbicides used in the past are no longer produced due to their hazards to human health
and the environment. Some of these pesticides and herbicides are also refractory in that they
do not degrade in the environment. There were no obvious mixing or chemical storage areas
on the site where spills, leaks or improper handling could have left high concentrations of the
pesticides or herbicides in the soil. However, use of the pesticides or herbicides may have left
a residue in the soil that exceeds acceptable human health or ecological risk screening
criteria.
2
A-5
Report of Phase t Environmental Site Assessment 12/03/2008
PSI Project 559-BE052
PSI recommends that in areas where development is planned, soil samples be obtained to
assess the concentrations of pesticides and herbicides in the soil. PSI suggests where soil is
proposed to be hauled off site samples should also be obtained to assess the options for
recycling or disposal of the soil.
The majority of the subject property is surrounded by vacant land that has been designated a
preserve by the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. The remaining area around the property
consists of single-family residential houses, farmland, and parks, including the Rancho Palos
Verdes Interpretive Center and Lighthouse. PSI found no evidence of recognized
environmental conditions in connection with the current uses of the adjoining and surrounding
property.
The adjoining and surrounding properties were previously undeveloped, native land through
the late 1940s with the exception of Palos Verdes Drive, which has been present since at least
1928. Portions of the surrounding properties to the north and west were historically used as
agriculture and later were developed as single-family residential homes. The adjoining property
to the east has been a tennis club since at least 1976, and beyond that a college. The property
to the south has remained vacant land until the present day with the exception of Palos Verde
Drive South. PSI found no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with
the past uses of the adjoining and surrounding properties.
1.1 PHASE I ESA
1.1.1 Significant Data Gaps
Based on our experience, the information that we gathered and evaluated did not present
significant data gaps that affected our ability to identify recognized environmental conditions
(RECs) in connection with the subject property.
1.1.2 Historic Recognized Environmental Conditions
This assessment has revealed no evidence of historical recognized environmental conditions
in connections with the subject property.
1.1.3 Recognized Environmental Conditions
PSI performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the subject property in
conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-05. Any exceptions to or
deletions from this practice are described in Section 3.2 of this report. This assessment has
revealed evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property.
On -Site Conditions
• Based on findings of the geophysical survey and the historical information provided to PSI
regarding operations at the Former Nike Missile Facility, PSI believes Anomalies 1 and 2
represent three petroleum USTs that have been abandoned in place. The presence of the
USTs represents a recognized environmental condition in connection with the subject
property.
Off -Site Conditions
• None were identified at this time.
o
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 559-8E052
1.2 RECOMMENDATIONS
12!03/2008
Based on the information that PSI gathered and our experience, PSI recommends the
following:
• PSI recommends that soil samples be obtained to assess the concentrations of pesticides
and herbicides in the soil in the area of the existing farmland on Lower Pointe Vicente, and
the area of vacant land at the northeast corner of the subject property on Upper Pointe
Vicente.
• PSI recommends excavation of the suspect USTs (Anomalies 1 and 2) and related product
piping lines identified in the Geophysical Survey. The USTs should be closed in accordance
with los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) UST closure
requirements.
• PSI recommends additional sampling in the areas of the five borings where heavy metals
(Barium, Cadmium, and Chromium) were detected during the SI in 2005 to determine
if samples exceed the California Title 22 Metals reporting limits.
4
A-7
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 9210312008
PSI Project 559-8E052
2 INTRODUCTION
2.1 CONTRACT
The contract between PSI and its client is summarized in the General Information section of
this report.
PSI considers the client to be the 'User' of our assessment, defined in ASTM Practice E 1527
as:
"the party seeking to use ASTM E 1527 to complete an environmental site assessment of the
property. A user may include, without limitation, a potential purchaser of property, a potential
tenant of property, an owner of property, a lender, or a property manager. The user has
specific obligations for completing a successful application of this practice...."
2.2 PURPOSE OF SERVICES
PSI performed the Phase I ESA in conformance with ASTM E 1527-05, Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (the
Practice). The purpose of the Practice was to define good commercial practice for conducting
an environmental site assessment and as such, the Practice is intended to permit the user to
satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs). The
goal of the processes established by the Practice is to identify RECs in connection with the
property.
In the absence of provided information, PSI assumes that your purpose for having the Phase [
ESA performed is to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the LLPs.
2.3 STANDARD OF CARE AND WARRANTIES
Our services were not intended to be technically exhaustive. There is a possibility that with the
proper application of methodologies, conditions may exist on the property that could not be
identified within the scope of the assessment(s) or that were not reasonably identifiable from
the available information.
No ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection with
the property. The ESA was intended to reduce, but not eliminate uncertainty regarding the
potential for RECs in connection with a property.
Our report is based on commonly known and reasonably ascertainable information, including
limited, ground -level visual inspection of the property except where otherwise explicitly
indicated, in conformance with ASTM E 1527-05, Findings and conclusions derived from the
methodologies described in the Practice contain all of the inherent limitations in the
methodologies that are referred to in the Practice.
PSI did not perform any exploratory probing or discovery, perform tests, operate any specific
equipment, or take measurements or samples to perform the ESA scope. The ESA was not a
building code, safety, regulatory or environmental compliance inspection. The ESA is not
intended to reduce the risk of the presence of mold and physical deficiencies conducive to
mold nor the risk that mold or physical deficiencies conducive to mold may pose to the
buildings and building occupants.
The methodologies include reviewing information provided by other sources. PSI treats
information obtained from the record reviews and interviews concerning the property as
reliable and the ASTM protocol does not require PSI to independently verify the information.
Therefore, PSI cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that the information provided by
these other sources is accurate or complete.
•
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 92/03/2008
PSI Project 559-8E052
PSI has performed the services in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill
ordinarily exercised by other members of our profession currently practicing in the same
locality and under similar conditions, within the limitations of ASTM E 1527-05 standard, the All
Appropriate Inquires Rule established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (40 C.F.R.
Part 312). No other warranties are implied or expressed.
The observations and recommendations presented in this report are time dependent, and
conditions will change. This report speaks only as of its date.
2.4 RELIANCE
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes, PSI's client, may rely on this report.
2.5 USE BY OTHER 'PARTIES
This report was prepared pursuant to a contract between PSI and its client. That contractual
relationship included an exchange of information about the property that was unique and
serves as the basis upon which this report was prepared. Because of the importance of these
understandings, our assessment may not be sufficient for the intended purposes of another
party.
Reliance or any use of this report by anyone other than those parties identified above, for
which it was prepared is prohibited and therefore not foreseeable to PSI. Any unauthorized
reliance on or use of this report, including any of the information or conclusions contained
herein, will be at the third party's risk. No warranties or representations expressed or implied
in this report are made to any such third party.
Third party reliance letters may be issued upon timely request and payment of the then -current
fee for such letters. All third parties relying on our report, by such reliance, agree that such
reliance is limited by our proposal and General Conditions.
i it -
_— 6
A-9
Report of phase i Environmental Site Assessment 92/03/2008
PSI Project 559-8E052
3 PHASE 1 ESA SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY
PSI performed a Phase I ESA of the subject property. The scope of our services and general
methodology is presented below.
The information sources that PS1 used, including published material, material obtained from
commercial and other sources, is listed below and cited as it is presented in the report. The
information or excerpts thereof is appended.
3.1 PHASE 1 ESA
The assessment included four components:
• Records review;
• Reconnaissance;
• Interviews; and,
• Preparation of this report, including our evaluation.
Physical Setting Sources
PSI reviewed United States Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic (Togo) Maps and other
information regarding the physical setting of the subject property to assist with the
interpretation of subsurface water movement near the subject property.
Summary
Source ?Jame
Year Publishedilssued
United States Geological Survey (USGS)
Topographic Ma "Redondo" Quadrangle
1996
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)
GeoTracker Database
2008
Environmental Database Report (EDR)
2008
Environmental Regulatory Database Information
PSI retained Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) to provide environmental database
information attributed to the site and its surroundings. EDR obtains environmental databases
published by local, state, tribal, and federal agencies and maps the information for electronic
searches. EDR's service includes reporting Standard Environmental Records Sources and, in
most cases, some Additional Environmental Records Sources.
The search was performed to Approximate Minimum Search Distances (AMSD) listed in ASTM
E 1527-05.
Unmappable (orphan) sites (if any were listed) having insufficient address information to be
mapped were evaluated for potential location within the AMSD. Those that could be
determined to be within the AMSD are discussed in Section 7 of the report.
Other Regulatory Information
PSI submitted requests under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to the agencies tabulated
below.
THE,
7
A-10
Report of Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 559-BE052
Summary
12/03/2008
Response?
Agency
Yes
County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works
Yes
County of Los Angeles Public Health Investigations
No
County of Los Angeles Sanitation District
Yes
Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor
Note: Response status based on date of report.
Historical Use Information
PSI used USGS Topo maps and retained EDR to provide information about the history of the
subject property and its surroundings. PSI referenced the following historical sources:
Summary
Source Type
Years Reviewed
Source
USGS Topographic Maps
1901, 1928, 1942, 1951, 1963,
1972, 1981, 1996
EDR
Aerial Photographs
1928, 1947, 1956, 1965, 1976,
1990, 1994, 2002, 2005
EDR
Ci Directories
1920-2006
EDR
Fire Insurance Mas
No Coverage
EDR
Recorded Land Title Records
PSI did not review land title records to obtain information about the current and past owners of
the subject property and past uses and tenancies.
User -Provided Information: Liens, AULs and Other Information
The Practice requires that the User provide information about Environmental [Cleanup] Liens
and Activity and Use Limitations (AULs) currently recorded against the property and indicates
that the User should engage a title company to do the review or negotiate such engagement as
an addition to the environmental professional's (EP) services. In addition, the Practice
suggests that the User provide the EP with certain other information about the property and the
reason for the Phase I ESA.
PSI sent a questionnaire to the client requesting this information. The questionnaire/response
is appended.
PSI obtained information about environmental cleanup liens and AULs at the request of the
client. PSI retained Environmental Data Resources (EDR), a firm specializing in real estate
record searches, to perform the search. We understand EDR used industry -standard methods
to obtain the information. Their information is appended.
Helpful Documents and Proceedings
The Practice requires that the environmental professional ask the property owner, the key site
manager (if any is identified), and the User for certain helpful documents about the property
and certain legal proceedings involving hazardous substances and the subject property.
PSI sent questionnaires requesting this information. The questionnaires/responses
documenting the persons we corresponded with are appended.
A-11
Report of Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 559-8E052
3.1.1 Reconnaissance
1210312008
The ground reconnaissance consisted of observing the periphery of the subject property and
viewing the subject property from accessible adjacent public access areas. Visual
reconnaissance of adjoining properties was limited to areas and facilities that were readily
observable from the subject property or from public access areas. PSI photodocumented
selected features.
Jonathan Braatvedt, of the Public Works Department for the City of Rancho Palos Verdes,
granted PSI access to the subject property. Our assessor was escorted by Mr.
Braatvedt during the site reconnaissance.
PSI systematically toured interior portions of the subject property to provide an overlapping
field of view. The peripheries of structures, where present on the subject property, were
observed along with accessible interior common areas, maintenance/repair areas, and a
representative number of occupant spaces.
3.1.2 Interviews
PSI made reasonable attempts to interview selected persons having knowledge of the uses
and conditions of the subject property, past and present. A list of the persons that PSI
interviewed or attempted to interview is presented in Section 8.
3.2 LIMITATIONS, EXCEPTIONS, DEVIATIONS AND DATA GAP
PSI considers that limitations, exceptions, and deviations from the Practice manifest as a lack
of or inability to obtain information required by the Practice. This represents the definition of
the 'data gap' contained in the Practice.
PSI listed the component objectives of the Practice on the appended Data Gap Worksheet and
tracked the information obtained against the objectives. Therefore the limitations, exceptions
and deviations are identified in the Worksheet.
In general, when required information was incomplete, not provided, otherwise not obtained, or
indicated a need for additional information, PSI attempted to use information from other
sources to meet the Practices' performance objectives. When the data gaps affected the
Environmental Professional's ability to identify RECs, PSI considered the data gap(s) to be
significant. PSI identified significant data gaps (if any) in the Data Gap Worksheet and
reported them in Section 1.1.1.
3.3 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS
PSI made the following assumptions in developing our Phase I ESA findings and conclusions:
• Regulatory Agency Information - PSI considers all information provided by our
environmental database subcontractor regarding regulatory status of facilities to be
complete, accurate, and current.
• Other Regulatory Information - PSI considers all information obtained from regulatory or
enforcement agencies to be complete, accurate, and current.
• Title, Lien and ALL Information - PSI considers all information provided by real estate title
record review firms regarding property use or ownership, encumbrances or other limitations
to be complete, accurate and current.
• Interviews - PSI considers all information provided through interviews to be complete,
unbiased and provided in good faith.
PSI interpreted and inferred the direction of the shallow groundwater movement based on the
information we obtained and our experience. Actual groundwater flow may be locally
a`}r
A-12
Report of Phase i Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 559-BE052
1210312008
influenced by many factors beyond the scope of this assessment. Subsurface investigation
would be necessary to determine site-specific groundwater flow direction.
ION
Iia 10
A-13
Report of Phase i Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 559-8E052
4 USER -PROVIDED INFORMATION
4.1 USER'S RESPONSIBILITIES
4.1.1 Environmental Cleanup Liens
1210312008
The client returned PSI's questionnaire indicating 'No' to the question: "Are you aware of any
environmental cleanup liens recorded against the property that are filed under federal, tribal,
state of local law?" Supporting documentation is appended.
4.1.2 AU LS
The client returned PSI's questionnaire indicating 'No' to the question: "Are you aware of any
AULs ... recorded against the property that are filed under federal, tribal, state of local law?"
Supporting documentation is appended.
4.2 SUGGESTED INFORMATION
The client provided PSI with none of the suggested information described by the Practice.
4.3 HELPFUL DOCUMENTS
Other documents provided to PSI are tabulated below: Pertinent portions of the document are
summarized below and the report or excerpts thereof may be appended to this report.
Summary
Report Title:
Former Nike Missile Facility Site Investigation
Prepared For:
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Prepared By:
Professional Service Industries, Inc.
Report Date:
September 7, 2005
Summary:
The purpose of the SI was to further assess the recognized environmental
conditions found in previous environmental assessments conducted at the former
Nike Missile Facility.
The Site Investigation assessment included the following activities:
. A geophysical survey of the project area was conducted to provide data on the
presence of explosive ordnances and underground structures such as underground
storage tanks (USTs), piping, utilities, etc., using ground penetrating radar (GPR),
electromagnetic induction (EM), and magnetometry.
• Eighteen (18) exterior soil borings (S13-1 through SB -18) were drilled an the former
Nike Missile Facility (in the vicinity of the current Cable, Maintenance, and
Generator Buildings, along the perimeter of the concrete launch pad, and on the
access road connecting the cable and Maintenance Buildings to the launch pad)
using a combination of direct -push, hallow -stem auger, and drive sampling
technologies to a maximum depth of approximately 15- to 20 -feet below ground
surface (bgs), where possible. Six (6) interior soil borings were drilled within the
missile silos (within the hydraulic lift elevator concrete pits, adjacent to the hydraulic
oil reservoirs; and along the piping associated with the hydraulic lifts) to a maximum
depth of 2 -feet bgs. Soil samples were collected at depths ranging from 1- to
20 -feet bgs.
Based on field screening, selected soil samples were analyzed for the following:
-Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) fuel screen using United States
Environmental Protection Agency EPA method 8015;
A-14
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 559-8E052
12/03/2008
ummary: -Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using EPA method 8260;
-Semi-VOCS (SVOCs) using EPA method 8270;
-Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) by EPA method 8082;
-Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) by EPA method 8021 B;
-Perchlorate using EPA Method 314;
-Nitrogen using EPA method 354.1;
-Chlorinated pesticides and herbicides by EPA Methods 8081 and 8151;
-State of California Title 22 metals using EPA method 6010; and
-pH using EPA method 9040.
One (1) liquid sample of the contents within the hydraulic oil tanktreservoir in the
Northeast Silo was collected. The liquid sample was analyzed for TPH fuel screen
by EPA Method 8015M, PCBs by EPA Method 8082 and SVOCs by EPA Method
8270. The hydraulic oil tank/reservoir in the Southwest Silo was empty.
The interior of the missile silos were surveyed for the presence of suspect ACM,
lead-based paint, and fungal/mold contamination.
Based on the findings of the S[, the following recommendations were provided by
PSI:
A Supplemental SI is recommended to delineate the vertical extent of the dieldrin
identified in boring SB -14 and to further assess the barium, cadmium, and
chromium concentrations identified in borings SB -3, SB -5, SB -8, SB -9, and SB -16.
STLC laboratory analysis for barium, cadmium, and chromium in borings SB -3,
SB -5, SB -8, SB -9, and SB -16 is recommended.
Excavation of the suspect USTs (Anomalies 1 and 2) and related product piping
fines identified in the Geophysical Survey is recommended. The USTs should be
closed in accordance with Los Angeles County Department of Public Works
LACDPW UST closure requirements.
4.4 PROCEEDINGS
PSI was not provided with information about legal proceedings or litigation involving the subject
property.
n' 1 12
A-15
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1210312008
PSI Project 559-BE052
5 SUBJECT PROPERTY USAGE
The location and approximate boundaries of the property are illustrated on the appended
figures. The legal description of the property, if provided to PSI, is appended.
5.1 PHYSICAL SETTING
Based on our interpretation of the physical setting sources and our experience, PSI infers that
the shallowest groundwater:
• Characteristics are indeterminate using the qualitative data that PSI has, and therefore we
are unable to infer its depth and/or direction.
Information about the physical setting of the subject property is tabulated below.
Summary
Note: MSL means Mean Sea Level
5.2 DESCRIPTION AND CURRENT USES
The subject property is comprised of a portion of the approximate 78 acre Upper Pointe
Vicente area located south of Hawthorne Boulevard and east of Palos Drive North, and
approximately 5.5 acres of active farmland identified as part of Lower Pointe Vicente located
southwest of Palos Verdes Drive North. Included in the Upper Pointe Vicente area is the City
Mall, which held the offices and barracks associated with the former Nike Missile base; asphalt
parking area and access road; the former Nike Missile silos; launch pad, three out -buildings
(the cable Building, generator building, and maintenance Building utilized by the City of
Rancho Palos Verdes Department of Public Works); the Pointe Vicente Battery #240 gun
emplacement; a tennis court; and a vacant area of land to the northeast of the former Nike
Missile silos.
5.2.1 Interior and Exterior Observations
A summary of uses and conditions is tabulated below. Detailed information is discussed
following the summary along with an opinion about the significance of the listing.
Summary
13
A-16
Report of Phase i Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 559-BE052
12/03/2008
Identified?
Item
No
Wastewater Discharges
No
Septic or Sewage Tanks
No
Drains or Sumps
No
Interior Stains or Corrosion
No
Stained Soil or Pavement
No
Pits, Ponds, or Lagoons
No
Pools of Liquid or Standing Water
No
Solid Waste Dumping/Landfills/Suspect Fill Material
No
Stressed Vegetation
No
Drinking Water Wells
No
Irrigation Wells
No
Monitoring Wells
No
Odors
No
Other Uses or Conditions of Concern
Summary
Hazardous Substances
PSI did not observe indications of significant quantities of hazardous substances at the subject
property.
Petroleum Products
PSI did not observe indications of significant quantities of petroleum products at the subject
property.
Aboveground or Underground Storage Tanks (ASTs/USTs)
Based on findings of the geophysical survey and the historical information provided to PSI
regarding operations at the Former Nike Missile Facility, PSI believes Anomalies 1 and 2
represent three petroleum USTs that have been abandoned in place.
PSI did not observe significant changes in the area of the three USTs during the site
reconnaissance on November 5, 2008, indicating that the USTs have not been removed. PSI
recommends excavation of the suspect USTs (Anomalies I and 2) and related product piping
lines identified in the Geophysical Survey. The USTs should be closed in accordance with Los
Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) UST closure requirements.
Drums
PSI did not observe drums at the subject property.
Suspect Containers Not Necessarily In Connection with Identified Uses
PSI did not observe suspect containers at the subject property.
Electrical or Mechanical Equip. Suspected to Contain PCBs
PSI did not observe suspect electrical or mechanical equipment at the subject property.
`:r 1 94
A-17
Report of Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 559-8E052
Wastewater Discharges
12/03/2008
PSI did not observe indications of wastewater discharges, other than domestic sewage, at the
subject property.
Septic or Sewage Tanks
PSI did not observe indications of the use of septic or sewage tanks at the subject property.
Drains or Sumps
PSI did not observe drains or sumps at the subject property.
Interior Stains or Corrosion
PSI did not observe significant stains or corrosion at the subject property.
Stained Soil Or Pavement
PSI did not observe soil or pavement exhibiting significant soil or staining at the subject
property.
Pits, Ponds, Or Lagoons
PSI did not observe indications of pits, ponds, or lagoons at the subject property.
Pools of Liquid Or Standing Water
PSI did not observe indications of pools of liquid or standing water at the subject property.
Solid Waste Dumping, Landfills, Or Suspect Fill Material
PSI did not observe indications of solid waste dumping, landfills, or suspect fill materials at the
subject property.
Stressed Vegetation
PSI did not observe stressed vegetation at the subject property.
Wells
PSI did not observe wells at the subject property.
Odors
PSI did not note odors at the subject property.
Other Uses or Conditions of Concern
PSI did not observe other uses of the subject property or special conditions of concern at the
subject property.
15
•
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 559-BE052
5.2.2 Utilities
Utility systems identified at the subject property are summarized below:
12/03/2008
• The City Hail and associated building's heating ventilating and air conditioning is fueled by
electricity provided by Southern California Edison.
• Potable water at the subject property is obtained through Cal Water.
PSI identified no evidence of RECs in the current uses of the subject property.
5.3 PASS" USES
Our interpretation of the past uses of the property is tabulated below.
Summary
Years
Interpreted Property use
1928
A topographic map depicts the property as vacant land. 1928
1947
An aerial photograph depicts Upper Pointe Vicente as being developed
with various small buildings and/or temporary structures. Lower Pointe
Vicente is depicted as vacant land. 1947
1956-2005
Aerial photographs depict Upper Pointe Vicente as being developed
with the Nike Missile facilty and associated buildings. Lower Pointe
Vicente is depicted as being used as farmland. (1956, 1965, 1976,
1990, 1994, 2002, 2005
The Upper Pointe Vicente portion of the subject property was undeveloped land until the
construction of the Nike Missile Facility in the early 1950s. Throughout the 1950's and 1960's,
the Nike Missile Facility was home to the administration and launch facilities for both the Nike
Ajax and Nike Hercules anti-aircraft missiles. It was designated as Los Angeles Defense Area
(LADA) #55, a part of the air defense system of Los Angeles. The Nike defense system
operated until approximately 1974. The former Nike Missile Facility is currently owned by the
City of Rancho Palos Verdes and is used as storage area for the Public Works Department.
According to historical aerial photographs, the vacant land at the northeast corner of the
subject property and the approximate 5.5 acre piece of land that is part of Lower Pointe
Vicente was historically used as agriculture since at least 1956. The land located within Lower
Pointe Vicente is still active farmland today. Agricultural chemicals including pesticides and or
herbicides have likely been used over the years to improve productivity. Many of the pesticides
and herbicides used in the past are no longer produced due to their hazards to human health
and the environment. Some of these pesticides and herbicides are also refractory in that they
do not degrade in the environment. There were no obvious mixing or chemical storage areas
on the site where spills, leaks or improper handling could have left high concentrations of the
pesticides or herbicides in the soil. However, use of the pesticides or herbicides may have left
a residue in the soil that exceeds acceptable human health or ecological risk screening
criteria.
PSI recommends that in areas where development is planned, soil samples be obtained to
assess the concentrations of pesticides and herbicides in the soil. PSI suggests where soil is
proposed to be hauled off site samples should also be obtained to assess the options for
recycling or disposal of the soil.
-- 16
A-19
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 559-BE052
12/03/2008
6 ADJOINING AND SURROUNDING PROPERTY USAGE
6.1 DESCRIPTION AND CURRENT USES
Our interpretation of the uses of the adjoining and surrounding property is tabulated below and
detailed in the subsequent sections.
Summary
Direction
Interpreted Property Use
North
Hawthorne Boulevard, followed by single-family residences to the north of Upper
No
Pointe Vicente; and single-family residences to the north of the farmland located
No
on Lower Pointe Vicente.
South
Vacant land and farmland, followed by Palos Verdes Drive South to the south of
No
Upper Pointe Vicente; and vacant land, followed by the Pointe Vicente
No
Interperative Center and Lighthouse to the south of the farmland located on Lower
No
Pointe Vicente.
East
Multiple tennis courts and vacant land to the east of Upper Pointe Vicente; and
No
Palos Verde Drive North, followed by vacant land to the east of the farmland
No
located on Lower Pointe Vicente.
West
Vacant land, followed by Palos Verde Drive North to the west of Upper Pointe
No
Vicente, and the Rancho Palos Verdes Interpretive Center to the west of the
No
farmland.
The majority of the subject property is surrounded by vacant land that has been designated a
preserve by the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. The remaining area around the property
consists of single-family residential houses, farmland, and parks, including the Rancho Palos
Verdes Interpretive Center and Lighthouse. PSI found no evidence of recognized
environmental conditions in connection with the current uses of the adjoining and surrounding
property.
6.1.1 Interior and Exterior Observations
A summary of our interpretation of the current and past uses and conditions of adjoining and
surrounding property based on historical records and observations is provided below.
Summary
Identified?
Item
No
Hazardous Substances
No
Petroleum Products
No
Aboveground or Underground Storage Tanks ASTs1USTs
No
Drums
No
Suspect Containers Not Necessarily In Connection with Identified Uses
No
Electrical or Mechanical Equip. Sus ected to Contain PCBs
No
Wastewater Discharges
No
Septic or Sewage Tanks
No
Drains or Sumps
No
Interior Stains or Corrosion
No
Stained Soil or Pavement
No
Pits, Ponds, or Lagoons
No
Pools of Liquid or Standing Water
No
Solid Waste Dum in /Landfills/Sus ect Fill Material
No
Stressed Vegetation
No
Drinking Water Wells
No
Irrigation Wells
No
Monitoring Wells
No
Odors
No
I Other Uses or Conditions of Concern
f j ,
't `'dr 17
A-20
Report of Phase t Environmental Site Assessment 12103/2008
PS! Project 559-8E052
Summary
Hazardous Substances
PSI did not observe indications of significant quantities of hazardous substances among the
properties surrounding the subject property.
Petroleum Products
PSI did not observe indications of significant quantities of petroleum products among the
properties surrounding the subject property.
Aboveground or Underground Storage Tanks (ASTsfUSTs)
PSI did not observe indications of ASTs/USTs among the properties surrounding the subject
property.
Drums
PSI did not observe drums among the properties surrounding the subject site.
Suspect Containers Not Necessarily in Connection with Identified Uses
PSI did not observe suspect containers among the properties surrounding the subject property.
Electrical or Mechanical Equip. Suspected to Contain PCBs
PSI did not observe suspect electrical or mechanical equipment among the properties
surrounding the subject property.
Wastewater Discharges
PSI did not observe indications of wastewater discharges, other than domestic sewage, among
the properties surrounding the subject property.
Septic or Sewage Tanks
PSI did not observe indications of the use of septic or sewage tanks among the properties
surrounding the subject property.
Drains or Sumps
PSI did not observe drains or sumps among the properties surrounding the subject property.
Interior Stains or Corrosion
PSI did not observe significant stains or corrosion among the properties surrounding the
subject property.
Stained Soil or Pavement
PSI did not observe soil or pavement exhibiting significant staining among the properties
surrounding the subject property.
A-21
Report of Phase i Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 559-BE052
Pits, Ponds, or Lagoons
12103/2008
PSI did not observe indications of pits, ponds, or lagoons among the properties surrounding
the subject property.
Pools of Liquid or Standing Water
PSI did not observe indications of pools of liquid or standing water among the properties
surrounding the subject property.
Solid Waste Dumping, Landfills, Or Suspect Fill Material
PSI did not observe indications of solid waste dumping, landfills, or suspect fill materials
among the properties surrounding the subject property.
Stressed Vegetation
PSI did not observe stressed vegetation among the properties surrounding the subject
property.
r_tn
PSI did not observe wells among the properties surrounding the subject property.
Odors
PSI did not note odors among the properties surrounding the subject property.
Other Uses or Conditions of Concern
PSI did not observe other uses or special conditions of concern among the properties
surrounding the subject property.
6.2 PAST USES
Our interpretation of the past uses of the adjoining and surrounding property is tabulated
below.
Summary
Years
Interpreted Property Use
1928
North: A topographic Map and an aerial photograph depict the property
as being undeveloped. 1928
1947
North: An aerial photograph depicts the property as being devleoped
with present day Hawthorne Boulevard, followed by undeveloped land.
1947
1956-1965
North: Aerial photographs depict the property as being developed with
Hawthorne Boulevard, followed by a mix of undeveloped land and
farmland.(1956, 1965)
1976-2002
North: Aerial photographs depict the property as being developed with
Hawthorne Boulevard, followed by vacant land and single-family
residental houses.(1976, 1990, 1994, 2002, 2005
rj =Wry=Li l
19
A-22
Report of Phase i Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 559-8E052
1210312008
Years
Interpreted Property Use j
1928-1947
South: A topographic map and an aerial photograph depict the property
as being undeveloped with the exception of Palos Verde Drive South..
1928, 1947
1956
South: An aerial photograph depicted the property as being developed
with a dirt access road and vacant land. 1956
1965-2005
South: Aerial photographs depicted the property as being vacant land
with the exception of the southeastern adjoining property which was
being used for agriculture, followed by Palos Verde Drive South. (1965,
1976, 1990, 1994, 2002, 2005
1928-1956
East: A topographic map (1928) and aerial photographs depict the
property as being undeveloped. 1928,1947, 1956
1965
East: An aerial photograph depicted the property as vacant land,
followed by Crestmont College Salvation Army at 3D840 Hawthorne
Boulevard. 1965
1976-2005
East: Aerial photographs depicted the property as being developed with
Peninsula Racquet Club at 30850 Hawthorne Boulevard, followed by
Crestmont College Salvation Army at 30840 Hawthorne Boulevard..
1976, 1990, 1994, 2002, 2005
1928-2005
West: Aerial photographs depict the property as being vacant land,
followed by Palos Verde Drive Borth. (1928, 1947, 1956, 1965, 1976,
1990, 1994, 2002, 2005
The adjoining and surrounding properties were previously undeveloped, native land through
the late 1940s with the exception of Palos Verdes Drive, which has been present since at least
1928. Portions of the surrounding properties to the north and west were historically used as
agriculture and later were developed as single-family residential homes. The adjoining property
to the east has been a tennis club since at least 1976, and beyond that a college. The property
to the south has remained vacant land until the present day with the exception of Palos Verde
Drive South. PSI found no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with
the past uses of the adjoining and surrounding properties.
UEa
20
A-23
Report of Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 559-BE052
1210312008
7 ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW
7.1 DATABASE FINDINGS
EDR's report identified the subject property, and the details of the listing are presented below.
EDR's report identified sites adjoining/surrounding the subject property. PSI considered most
of the listed sites unlikely to impact the subject property, based upon factors including (but not
limited to):
• The nature of the listing
• The use of the site
• When the site was listed and its current listed status
• The developmental density of the setting
• The distance between the listed sites and the subject property as related to the distance
that releases are likely to migrate based on local surface and subsurface drainage
conditions
• The presence of intervening drainage divides
• The inferred groundwater movement
The distribution of listed sites with respect to the subject property is tabulated and mapped in
EDR's report. A copy of that table follows. Additional details are listed below.
Database
Target
Property
Search
Distance
Miles
a 118
118 -114
114 -112
112 -1
, 1
Total
Plotted
NPL
1
0
0
0
0
NR
0
DELISTED NPL
1
0
0
0
0
NR
0
CERCLIS
0.5
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
CERCLIS-NFRAP
0.5
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
CORRACTS
1
0
0
0
0
NR
0
RCRA-TSDF
0.5
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
RCRA-LQG
0.25
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-SQG
0.25
0
2
NR
NR
NR
2
ERNS
X
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US ENG CONTROLS
1
0.5
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US INST CONTROL
0.5
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
FUDS
1
0
0
1
0
NR
1
US BROWNFIELDS
0.5
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LF
0.5
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LUST
0.5
0
1
0
NR
NR
1
UST
0.25
0
1
1 NR
NR
NR
1
HIST UST
0.25
0
1
NR
NR
NR
1
AST
0.25
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
VCP
0.5
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
DRYCLEANERS
0.25
0
1
NR
NR
NR
1
CORTESE
0.5
0
1
0
NR
NR
1
DEED
0.5
0
0
1
NR
NR
1
SWEEPS UST
0.25
0
1
NR
NR
NR
1
ENVIROSTOR
1
0
0
1
0
NR
1
H[ST CALSITES
1
0
0
1
0
NR
1
HMS LOS ANGELES
X
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RESPONSE
1
0
0
1
0
NR
1
HAZNET
X
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SLIC
0.5
0
0
1
NR
NR
1
INDIAN RESERVE
1
0
0
0
0 1
NR
0
INDIAN LUST R1
0.5
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN UST R1
1
0.25
0
1 0
NR
NR
NR
0
INDIAN ODI
1
1. 0.5 1
0
1 0
0
NR I
NR
0
j g L !
21
A-24
Report of Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 559-8E052
1210312008
Database
Target Search
Property Distance
Miles
< 118
118 - 114
114 - 112
1/2 - 1
? 1
Total
Plotted
INDIAN LUST R9
0.5
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN VCP R1
15
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN LUST R8
0.5
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN UST R10
0.25
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
INDIAN VCP R7
0.5
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN UST R9
0.25
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
INDIAN LUST R10
0.5
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN UST R4
025
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
INDIAN UST R8
0.25
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
INDIAN UST R7
0.25
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
INDIAN LUST R7
0.5
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN LUST R4
0.5
0
0
0
NR I
NR
0
INDIAN LUST R6
0.5
0
D
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN UST R6
0.25
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
INDIAN UST R5
0.25
0
1 0
NR
NR I
NR
0
Summary
Site Name: COUNTY SANITATION DISTS OF L. A. COUNTY, POINTE VICENTE-BATTERY 240,
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Databases: HAZNET, HMS, ERNS
Address: 30940 HAWTHORNE BLVD
Distance: 0
Direction: Subject Property
Elevation: Equal
Comments: The City of Rancho Palos Verdes Department of Public Works is listed in the HAZNET
database for disposing of multiple tons of househole waste via a transfer station,
landfill, and inceration. Based on current regulatory status, this listing does not
represent a recognized environmental condition in connection with the subject
property.
The Department of Public Works is also listed in the Emergency Response Notification
System (ERNS) database as releasing 10 gallons of raw sewage via a manhole over
flow that was under construction in 1988. The spill was remediated and the case is
closed. Based on current regulatory status, this listing does not represent a recognized
environmental condition in connection with the subject property.
The Pointe Vicente -Battery 240 which was formerly operational at the subject property,
is listed on the Los Angeles County HMS database as having a permit to either
discharge hazardous waste or to operate underground storage tanks (USTs).
According to the database the permit is not active. Based on current regulatory status,
this listing does not represent a recognized environmental condition in connection with
the subject property.
7.2 OTHER REGULATORY INFORMATION
PSI submitted Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to the agencies listed below.
Response status is also tabulated.
• County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works: This agency is expected to have
records on past or present tenants who have or had a permit to generate and discharge
industrial waste on the subject property or may have utilized underground storage tanks for
the storage or disposal of hazardous waste.
A-25
Report of Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 559-BE052
12/03/2008
• County of Los Angeles, Public Health Investigations: A response has not been received.
Should significant information be identified, it will be forwarded upon receipt in an
Addendum to this report.
• South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD): This agency is expected to have
records pertaining to facilities that are required to have a permit to discharge emissions into
the atmosphere. The subject property was not found in the online database.
• County of Los Angeles Sanitation District: This agency is expected to have records
pertaining to industrial waste discharge permits. A response was received via a phone
call from Ms. Charlene Hamilton, of LA County Sanitation, whom indicated that no records
were found in their database for subject property.
ER-
SQ
23
A-26
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 12103/2008
PSI Project 559-8E052
8 INTERVIEW'S
PSI interviewed parties potentially having information about current and/or former conditions at
the subject property. The parties and their affiliation are tabulated below.
Summary
Name
Affiliation
bole
Mr. Jonathan Braatvedt
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Department of Public Works
Client
Desk Clerk
City of Rancho Pales Verdes
Building De artment
Local Gov't Official
Charlene Hamilton
I LA County Sanitation District
I Local Gov't Official
A-27
FRASi InfcnruttionEY U To
BaciId On
Engineering . Consulting • Testing
Report of
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Upper Point Vicente
30940 Hawthorne Boulevard
Rancho Palos Verdes, Los Angeles County,
California 90275
Prepared for
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Boulevard
Rancho Palos Verdes, California 90275
Prepared by
Professional Service Industries, Inc.
6330 Gateway Drive, Suite B
Cypress, California 90630
September 8, 2010
PSI Project 0559334
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment September 8, 2010
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS............................................................................ 1
1.1 PHASE I ESA...............................................................................................
1
1.2 RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................3
2 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................
4
2.1 CONTRACT.................................................................................................4
2.2 PURPOSE OF SERVICES..........................................................................
4
2.3 STANDARD OF CARE AND WARRANTIES ...............................................
5
2.4 USE BY OTHER PARTIES..........................................................................
5
3 SCOPE AND RESOURCES..................................................................................... 7
3.1 PHASE I ESA...............................................................................................
7
3.2 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES..........................................................
9
3.3 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS...................................................................
9
3.4 LIMITATIONS, EXCEPTIONS, DEVIATIONS AND DATA GAP ................
10
4 USER -PROVIDED INFORMATION........................................................................
11
4.1 USER'S RESPONSIBILITIES.................................................................... 11
4.2 HELPFUL DOCUMENTS........................................................................... 11
4.3 PROCEEDINGS........................................................................................ 14
4.4 SUGGESTED INFORMATION.................................................................. 14
4.5 FINDINGS..................................................................................................14
5 SUBJECT PROPERTY USAGE............................................................................. 15
5.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION .................................................. 15
5.2 PHYSICAL SETTING................................................................................. 15
5.3 CURRENT USES....................................................................................... 16
5.4 PAST USES............................................................................................... 18
6 ADJOINING AND SURROUNDING PROPERTY USAGE ..................................... 19
7 ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW ..................................... 21
7.1 DATABASE FINDINGS.............................................................................. 21
7.2 OTHER REGULATORY INFORMATION................................................... 22
8 INTERVIEWS......................................................................................................... 22
8.1 INTERVIEW PARTIES............................................................................... 23
8.2 INTERVIEW FINDINGS.............................................................................23
APPENDICES
FIGURES
PHOTOGRAPHS
ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE REPORT
HISTORICAL RESEARCH INFORMATION
REGULATORY RECORDS DOCUMENTATION
INTERVIEW DOCUMENTATION
DATA GAP WORKSHEET
PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment September 8, 2010
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
1 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) performed a Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment (Phase I ESA) of the Upper Point Vicente property at 30940 Hawthorne
Boulevard in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, California. The assessment included a
Phase I ESA and PSI performed the assessment to comply with the contract between
PSI and The City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
The subject property is currently developed with the Rancho Palos Verdes City Hall
complex. Several buildings are located throughout the 23 acre property known as the
Upper Point Vicente. The northwestern portion of the property is developed with three
buildings currently occupied by the City Hall, Community Development Department, and
a community technology center. The western portion of the property is developed with
a senior center. The southern portion of the property, formerly a Nike Missile site, is
currently being utilized for trash receptacle storage, has a cable television studio, a
vacant guard shack, and a public works storage building. The eastern portion of the
property is mostly undeveloped with the exception of a former generator building that is
currently used for traffic control equipment and sign storage. The remainder of the
property is developed with a tennis court, paved parking, and landscaped areas.
The subject property was first developed in 1942 as part of the Harbor Defenses of Los
Angeles. The subject property was developed with anti-aircraft fire control and gun
emplacements. In the early 1950's, the subject property was developed with
administration and launch facilities for Nike Ajax and Nike Hercules anti-aircraft missile
systems. As the missile systems became obsolete in the early 1970's, the site was
decommissioned and turned over to the city of Rancho Palos Verdes in 1979.
Current uses of the adjoining properties consist of: Hawthorne Boulevard followed by
residential development to the north, undeveloped land to the south, a racquet club to
the east, and a coast guard communication facility to the west.
The adjoining properties were undeveloped land until the early 1940's when the western
adjoining property was developed as part of the military reservation formerly located on
the subject property. By the mid 1970's the eastern adjoining property was developed
with a racquet club. By 1990, the northern adjoining property, across Hawthorne
Boulevard, was developed with residential development. PSI identified no evidence of
recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in the current and past uses of adjoining
and surrounding property.
1.1 PHASE I ESA
PSI performed the Phase I ESA in general conformance with ASTM E 1527-05.
Limitations, exceptions and deviations from this protocol are discussed in Section 3.
1
B-3
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment September 8, 2010
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
1.1.1 OPINIONS
Significant Data Gaps
Based on our experience, the information that we gathered and evaluated did not
present significant data gaps that affected our ability to identify RECs in connection with
the subject property.
Recognized Environmental Conditions
This assessment revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in
connection with the property.
1.1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL DECLARATIONS
Mr. Eric Fraske, Assessor and Environmental Professional, gathered and compiled
information contained in this report and performed the site and area reconnaissance.
Eric Fraske, PE
Environmental Professional
I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the
definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312.
I have the specific qualifications based on education, training and experience to
assess a property of the nature, history and setting of the subject property. I
have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with
the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR 312.
Reviewed by:
Lloyd Guss, PG
Principal Consultant
2
B-4
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment September 8, 2010
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
1.2 RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the information that PSI gathered and our experience, PSI recommends the
following:
• No further assessment is recommended.
This summary does not contain all the information presented in the full report. The
report should be read in its entirety to obtain a more complete understanding of the
information provided and to aid in any decisions made or actions taken based on this
information.
3
B-5
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
2 INTRODUCTION
2.1 CONTRACT
The contract between PSI and Client is summarized below:
September 8, 2010
Summary
Client
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Authorizing Party
Carolyn Lehr
Title
Cit Mana er
Engagement ID, Date
Professional Services Agreement
August 9, 2010
PSI considers the client to be the `User' of our assessment, defined in the Practice as:
"The party seeking to use Practice E 1527 to complete an environmental site
assessment of the property. A user may include, without limitation, a potential
purchaser of a property, a potential tenant of property, an owner of property, a
lender or a property manager. The user has specific obligations for completing a
successful application of this practice...."
2.2 PURPOSE OF SERVICES
Based on the information provided, PSI understands that your purpose for having the
Phase I ESA performed is to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent
landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations
on CERCLA liability (hereinafter landowner liability protections or LLPs). The scope of
services presented below is intended to satisfy this purpose.
PSI performed the Phase I ESA in general conformance with ASTM E 1527-05,
Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment Process (the Practice). The purpose of the Practice was to define good
commercial practice for conducting an environmental site assessment and as such, the
Practice is intended to permit the user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for
the LLPs. The goal of the processes established by the Practice is to identify
recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in connection with the property.
Our services included effort outside the scope of the Practice to evaluate issues related
to business environmental risk associated with the property. The purpose of these
services was to provide information about certain conditions that can have a material
environmental or environmentally -driven impact on the business associated with the
current or planned use of the property.
4
B-6
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment September 8, 2010
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
2.3 STANDARD OF CARE AND WARRANTIES
Our services were not intended to be technically exhaustive. There is a possibility that
with the proper application of methodologies, conditions may exist on the property that
could not be identified within the scope of the assessment(s) or that were not
reasonably identifiable from the available information.
No ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection
with the property. The ESA was intended to reduce, but not eliminate uncertainty
regarding the potential for RECs in connection with a property.
Our report is based on commonly known and reasonably ascertainable information,
including limited, ground -level visual inspection of the property except where otherwise
explicitly indicated, in conformance with ASTM E 1527-05. Findings and conclusions
derived from the methodologies described in the Practice contain all of the inherent
limitations in the methodologies that are referred to in the Practice.
PSI did not perform any exploratory probing or discovery, perform tests, operate any
specific equipment, or take measurements or samples to perform the ESA scope. The
ESA was not a building code, safety, regulatory or environmental compliance
inspection. The ESA is not intended to reduce the risk of the presence of mold and
physical deficiencies conducive to mold nor the risk that mold or physical deficiencies
conducive to mold may pose to the buildings and building occupants.
The methodologies include reviewing information provided by other sources. PSI treats
information obtained from the record reviews and interviews concerning the property as
reliable and the ASTM protocol does not require PSI to independently verify the
information. Therefore, PSI cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that the
information provided by these other sources is accurate or complete. No other
warranties are implied or expressed.
PSI warrants that the findings contained in this report have been prepared in general
conformance with accepted professional practices at the time of report preparation as
applied by similar professionals. Future changes in standards, practices, or regulations
cannot be anticipated and have not been addressed.
The observations and recommendations presented in this report are time dependent,
and conditions will change. This report speaks only as of its date.
2.4 USE BY OTHER PARTIES
This report was prepared pursuant to a contract between PSI and its client. That
contractual relationship included an exchange of information about the property that
was unique and serves as the basis upon which this report was prepared. Because of
s
B-7
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
September 8, 2010
the importance of these understandings, our assessment may not be sufficient for the
intended purposes of another party.
Reliance or any use of this report by anyone other than those parties identified above,
for which it was prepared is prohibited and therefore not foreseeable to PSI. Any
unauthorized reliance on or use of this report, including any of the information or
conclusions contained herein, will be at the third party's risk. No warranties or
representations expressed or implied in this report are made to any such third party.
Third party reliance letters may be issued upon timely request and payment of the then -
current fee for such letters. All third parties relying on our report, by such reliance,
agree that such reliance is limited by our proposal and General Conditions.
6
B-8
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
3 SCOPE AND RESOURCES
3.1 PHASE I ESA
September 8, 2010
PSI performed a Phase I ESA of the subject property that generally conforms to the
scope and limitations of the Practice. The assessment included four components:
• Records review;
• Reconnaissance;
• Interviews; and
• Preparation of this report, including our evaluation.
The scope of our services and the information resources accessed are detailed below.
3.1.1 STAFF
Mr. Eric Fraske, Environmental Professional, gathered and compiled information for this
assessment, including performing the site and area reconnaissance on August 17,
2010. Credentials and qualifications of persons responsible for preparation of this report
are appended.
3.1.2 RECORDS REVIEW
Physical Setting Sources
PSI reviewed United States Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic (Topo) Maps and
other information regarding the physical setting of the site to assist with the
interpretation of subsurface water movement near the property.
Summary
Source Name
Year Published/Issued
USGS 60 Minute Topo Map
Southern CA Sheet 1: 1901
USGS 7.5 Minute Topo Map
San Pedro Hill: 1928,1942
USGS 7.5 Minute Topo Map
Long Beach Vicinity: 1951
USGS 7.5 Minute Topo Map
Redondo Beach: 1963, 1972, 1981, 1996
Soil Survey
EDR: 2010
Environmental Regulatory Database Information
PSI retained Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) to provide environmental
database information attributed to the site and its surroundings. EDR obtains
environmental databases published by local, state, tribal, and federal agencies and
geocodes the information for electronic searches. EDR's service includes reporting
B-9
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment September 8, 2010
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Standard Environmental Records Sources and, in most cases, some Additional
Environmental Records Sources.
The search was performed to Approximate Minimum Search Distances (AMSD) listed in
ASTM E 1527-05.
Unmappable (orphan) sites listed with insufficient address or geocoding information for
EDR to map were evaluated for potential location within the AMSD. PSI used
information provided about the city, county and zip code attributed to these sites to
determine if they are located in the vicinity of the subject property.
Historical Use Information
PSI used USGS Topo maps and retained EDR to provide information about the history
of the site and its surroundings. PSI also referenced other historical sources.
Summary
Source Type
Years Reviewed
Source
Note
USGS Topo Maps
See Above
USGS
Aerial Photograph(s)
1928, 1947, 1953,
1965, 1976, 1990,
1994, 2002, 2005
EDR
Fire Insurance Maps
No Coverage
EDR
Street Directories
1920-2002
EDR
NA = None Available (Not Readily Ascertainable). NR = Not Reviewed. NPR = Not Practically
Reviewable. Topographic Maps reviewed are previously listed.
Recorded Land Title Records
PSI did review land title records to obtain information about the current and past owners
of the site and prior uses and tenancies.
User -Provided Information
The Practice describes information to be provided by the user, owner, and key site
manager. This information is detailed on appended questionnaires that PSI sent to the
user.
3.1.3 RECONNAISSANCE
Ms. Sara Singer, Senior Administrative Analyst with the City of Rancho Palos Verdes,
granted PSI access to the site. Ms. Singer escorted PSI during site reconnaissance.
The ground reconnaissance consisted of observing the periphery of the property and
viewing the site from accessible adjacent public access areas. Visual reconnaissance
8
B-10
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment September 8, 2010
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
of adjoining properties was limited to areas and facilities that were readily observable
from the subject property or from public access areas.
PSI systematically toured interior portions of the property to provide an overlapping field
of view. The periphery of structures, where present on the property, were observed
along with accessible interior common areas, maintenance/repair areas and a
representative number of occupant spaces.
PSI took photographs to document selected features.
3.1.4 INTERVIEWS
PSI made reasonable attempts to interview selected persons having knowledge of the
uses and conditions of the site, past and present. A list of the persons that PSI
interviewed and attempted to interview, along with our interpretations is presented in
Section 8.
3.1.5 REFERENCES
The information sources that PSI used, including published material, material obtained
from commercial sources, from other sources, or provided to us through questionnaires
is cited as that information is presented in the report. Some of this information or
excerpts thereof is also appended.
3.2 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
Our services did not include effort outside the scope of the Practice to evaluate issues
related to business environmental risk associated with the property.
3.3 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS
PSI made the following assumptions in developing our Phase I ESA findings and
conclusions:
• Groundwater Flow Direction - PSI interpreted and inferred the direction of the
shallow groundwater movement based on the information we obtained and our
experience. Actual groundwater flow may be locally influenced by many factors
beyond the scope of this study. Subsurface investigation would be necessary to
determine site-specific groundwater flow direction.
• Regulatory Agency Information - PSI considers all information provided by EDR
regarding regulatory status of facilities to be complete, accurate, and current.
• Other Regulatory Information - PSI considers all other information obtained from
regulatory or enforcement agencies to be complete, accurate, and current.
• Title, Lien, and Activity and Use Limitation (AUL) Information — PSI considers all
information provided by EDR, its subcontractors, or other real estate title records
9
B-11
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
September 8, 2010
review firms regarding property ownership or encumbrances to be complete,
accurate and current.
• Interviews - PSI considers all information provided through interviews to be
complete, unbiased and provided in good faith.
3.4 LIMITATIONS, EXCEPTIONS, DEVIATIONS AND DATA GAP
PSI considers that limitations, exceptions and deviations from the Practice manifest as a
lack of or inability to obtain information required by the Practice. This represents the
definition of the `data gap' contained in the Practice.
PSI tracked the components for this assessment on the Data Gap Worksheet, which is
appended. Therefore the limitations, exceptions and deviations are identified in the
Worksheet.
In general, when required information was incomplete, not provided, otherwise not
obtained or indicated a need for additional information, PSI attempted to use information
from other sources to meet the Practices' performance objectives. When the data gaps
affected the Environmental Professional's ability to identify RECs, PSI considered the
data gap(s) to be significant. PSI identifies significant data gaps (if any) in the Data Gap
Worksheet and reports them in Section 1.1. Data gaps are discussed below.
• Access to the missile silos was not permitted at the time of site reconnaissance
due to possible confined entry safety concerns.
10
B-12
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment September 8, 2010
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
4 USER -PROVIDED INFORMATION
PSI provided the client with a standard questionnaire. The questionnaires are
appended and selected portions are discussed in the following sections.
4.1 USER'S RESPONSIBILITIES
4.1.1 LIENS
PSI obtained information about environmental liens recorded against the subject
property at the request of the client. PSI retained EDR to perform the search.
The information indicated that an environmental lien is not recorded against the subject
property.
4.1.2 ACTIVITY AND LAND USE LIMITATIONS (AULS)
PSI obtained information about AULs against the subject property at the request of the
client. PSI retained EDR to perform the search.
The information indicated that an AUL is not recorded against the subject property. An
AUL is recorded against the Point Vicente Interpretive Center, which is located to the
south of the subject property. The AUL is related to lead impacted soils located at the
Interpretive Center and is not considered to be a recognized environmental condition in
connection with the subject property.
4.2 HELPFUL DOCUMENTS
The client provided PSI with several prior assessment and property history reports of
the subject property. A summary of the previous reports are presented below.
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Application. Submitted to the United State
Department of the Interior Bureau of Outdoor Recreation. March 1, 1976.
In this application, the subject property is described to be developed with a Nike missile
battery with associated support buildings. No evidence of recognized environmental
conditions was identified during this appraisal.
Appraisal Report 7.1 Acres Former LADA Nike Site 55, Rancho Palos Verdes,
California. Prepared by Booth, Crosbie, and Pike. Prepared for the City of Rancho
Palos Verdes. September 27, 1977.
At the time of this appraisal, the subject property was developed with the present day
structures with the exception of the senior center and computer training building. Two
smaller shed buildings were present on the subject property but have since been
11
B-13
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment September 8, 2010
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
demolished. No evidence of recognized environmental conditions was identified during
this appraisal.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 168.40 Acres Resort Hotel Area and
Upper Point Vicente Area, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA. Prepared for the City of
Rancho Palos Verdes. Prepared by RBF Consulting. September 15, 2000.
A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the subject property was conducted
by RBF Consulting in September 2000. The ESA included the Upper Point Vicente Area
(land owned by the City of Rancho Palos Verdes and the County of Los Angeles), which is
located adjacent to the north of Palos Verdes Drive South and the Resort Hotel Area
(formerly Marine Land Aquatic Park) located south of Palos Verdes Drive South. The
Upper Point Vicente Area included the City of Rancho Palos Verdes City Hall, the Cable
Building, Point Vicente Battery #240, and two former Nike Missile silos. The southeastern
portion of the Upper Point Vicente Area was developed for agricultural use. The Phase I
ESA identified recognized environmental conditions and provided the following findings
and recommendations for further investigation. Only the findings and recommendations
for the former Nike Missile Facility are summarized.
• Based on two untitled historical information packets provided by the City of Rancho
Palos Verdes, the Upper Point Vicente Area was formerly owned and operated by the
United States Army as a missile (Nike) site and gunnery range until 1974.
• Surveys of the former Nike Missile Facility conducted in 1992 and 1996 by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers indicated that the risk associated with explosive ordnance
and missile propellants is low as these materials were removed from the area.
• As part of the abandonment by the U.S. Army of the Nike Missile Facility (Nike Bunker
Battery #55), three (3) abandoned fuel storage tanks and the sampling and disposal of
seven 55 -gallon drums were identified. Soil sampling was also conducted around
these identified areas and in the area of the former paint storage shed and acid storage
and fueling facilities. However, according to the historical research conducted by RBF
Consulting, it is unclear whether the soil sampling actually was conducted.
• Current and historical agricultural usage of the subject property potentially released
pesticides, which are now banned. Historical use of agricultural pesticides may result
in pesticide residue in the soil at concentrations that could be considered a human
health risk. There is no regulatory requirement that soil is tested prior to development.
• Due to the age of the existing structures, the structural components of the Nike Missile
silos may potentially contain ACM, lead based paints, and PCBs. The onsite
structures, including the Nike Missile silos and two out -buildings, should be surveyed
prior to the commencement of any demolition or remedial work.
• During the 2000 Phase I ESA site reconnaissance conducted by RBF Consulting, an
unknown liquid (possibly rain water) was observed pooling in the lower portion of the
concrete floor (near the hydraulic lifts) inside the Nike Missile Silos.
12
B-14
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment September 8, 2010
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
• Based on the construction date of the facility (1950s), PCBs may be present in the
transformers and the hydraulic lifts within the Nike Missile Facility. It was
recommended that the liquid in the transformers and hydraulic oil tank be sampled and
analyzed.
• A Phase II level investigation was recommended to determine the level of potential
contamination associated with the historic use of the Upper Point Vicente Area.
• Any proposed modifications to the Nike Missile silos should be coordinated with the
appropriate authorities from the United States Department of the Interior or National
Park Service.
• The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Ordnance and Explosive Chemical Warfare
Material Archives Search in 2000 did not locate any documentation relating to chemical
warfare materials activities, including chemical warfare training, chemical warfare
material storage, use or disposal at the Point Vicente Seacoast Defense Sites.
Investigation of historical records did not reveal any certificates of ordnance clearance,
decontamination, or dedudding associated with the Point Vicente Seacoast Defense
Sites. The archive search did not find any indication of a current ordnance and
explosive hazard from the military's use of Point Vicente Seacoast Defense Sites. The
site survey did not reveal any specific ordnance or explosive hazard at the areas
inspected.
• Based on the existing documentation, it is unclear whether the former Nike Missile
Facility has been cleared by the DOD for further development opportunities.
• No significant environmental condition associated with the stockpiling of material such
as yard waste and other non -hazardous materials was observed in the City Corporate
Yard.
• No significant environmental conditions were noted to result in impacts to the project
site for offsite facilities or land uses.
Site Investigation for the Former Nike Missile Facility. Prepared for the City of
Rancho Palos Verdes. Prepared by PSI. September 7, 2005.
PSI performed an assessment in 2005 to address some of the recommendations put
forth in the 2000 RBF Consulting Phase I. PSI performed a geophysical survey and
limited soil sampling in the vicinity of the Nike Missile Silos, Public Works maintenance
building, and sign storage building. Soil samples were collected from 24 soil borings
advanced throughout the property and analyzed for petroleum hydrocarbons, volatile
organic compounds, metals, pesticides, and PCBS. The results of the laboratory
analysis identified several areas with concentrations of regulated metals that would
require further analysis to determine waste disposal characteristics and one location
with a concentration of dieldrin above residential health standards. Additionally, a
geophysical anomaly indicative of several underground storage tanks was identified
near the Public Works maintenance building. PSI recommended that the areas of metal
13
B-15
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment September 8, 2010
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
and pesticide impacted soil be further evaluated and the soil above the geophysical
anomaly be excavated to determine the presence of underground storage tanks.
Limited Site Investigation Report. Upper Point Vicente. Prepared for the City of
Rancho Pals Verdes. Prepared by PSI. March 12, 2009.
In 2009, PSI collected soil samples from five soil borings in the vicinity of the elevated
metals concentrations. The results of this analysis revealed no concentrations of
regulated metals in excess of human health guidelines or soluble metal concentrations
above hazardous waste disposal limits. PSI recommended no further assessment.
Underground Storage Tank Exploration Letter Report. Upper Point Vicente.
Prepared for the City of Rancho Pals Verdes. Prepared by PSI. March 25, 2009.
In March of 2009, PSI directed excavation activities in the area of the suspected
underground storage tanks identified during the 2005 geophysical survey. The
excavation revealed that the geophysical anomaly was actually a large concrete pad -
like footing placed over bedrock and not an underground storage tank. PSI
recommended no further assessment.
4.3 PROCEEDINGS
The client provided PSI with documentation about legal proceedings or litigation
involving the subject property. The documentation indicated that at present, the subject
property is not part of any legal proceedings or litigation.
4.4 SUGGESTED INFORMATION
PSI requested certain information about the property to assist with our assessment.
Most of this information, such as the nature of the property and its legal description, are
presented in the corresponding section of this report.
4.5 FINDINGS
A previous site assessment performed in 2005, revealed one area of shallow soil
impacted with dieldrin, a pesticide, above human health limits for residential land use.
This concentration however is below commercial/industrial land use human health
guidelines. Based on the current usage of the subject property, this concentration is not
considered to represent a recognized environmental condition.
14
B-16
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
5 SUBJECT PROPERTY USAGE
5.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION
September 8, 2010
Summary
Project Name
Upper Point Vicente
Property Address
30940 Hawthorne Boulevard
City, County, State, ZIP Code
Rancho Palos Verdes, Los Angeles County, California, 90275
No. Buildings/Stories/Square
City Hall Building: Two Stories -17,530 sf
Footage (sf)
Community Development Department: Single Story -4,604 sf
Off -Site Water Bodies
Computer Training Building: Single Story -3,083 sf
Note: MSL means Mean Sea Level
Cable TV Building: Single Story -1,242 sf
Public Works Maintenance Building: Single Story -890 sf
Road Sign Storage Building: Single Story -880 sf
Site Area (acres)
Approximately 23 acres
Occupied Subgrade Spaces?
Two Nike Missile Silos -not accessed
Year(s), First Developed for
1942 -Construction of Point Vicente Military Reservation
Current Use
Year Significant Renovations
-1950-Addition of Nike and Ajax Missile Silos
1979 -Conversion to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes City Hall
5.2 PHYSICAL SETTING
Summary
Nominal Elevations, (ft, MSL)
368 feet
Surface Topo Characteristics
General topographic gradient towards the south-
southwest
General Soil Type
Calleguas Clay Loam
Does EDR Map a Floodplain On -Site?
No
On -Site Water Bodies
None
Off -Site Water Bodies
None on adjoining properties
Note: MSL means Mean Sea Level
Information regarding the groundwater table was obtained through previous site
assessment reports referenced in Section 4.0 of this report. Based on our interpretation
of the physical setting sources and our experience, PSI infers that the shallowest
groundwater:
• Occurs at depths greater than 20 feet below the ground surface; and,
• Moves towards the southwest.
15
B-17
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
5.3 CURRENT USES
September 8, 2010
The subject property is currently developed with the Rancho Palos Verdes City Hall
complex. Several buildings are located throughout the 23 acre property known as the
Upper Point Vicente. The northwestern portion of the property is developed with three
buildings currently occupied by the City Hall, Building and Planning Department, and a
community technology center. The western portion of the property is developed with a
senior center. The southern portion of the property, a former Nike Missile site, is
currently being utilized for trash receptacle storage, a cable TV studio, a vacant guard
shack, and a public works storage building. The eastern portion of the property is mostly
undeveloped with the exception of a former generator building that is currently used for
traffic control equipment and sign storage. The remainder of the property is developed
with a tennis court, paved parking, and landscaped areas.
5.3.1 INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS
A summary of uses and conditions is tabulated below. Detailed information is
discussed following the summary along with an opinion about the significance of the
listing.
16
B-18
Summary
Yes
Identified?
No
®
❑
Hazardous Substances
®
❑
Petroleum Products
®
❑
Aboveground or Underground Storage Tanks (ASTs/USTs)
®
❑
Drums
❑
®
Suspect Containers
❑
❑
Electrical or Mechanical Equip. Suspected to Contain PCBs
®
❑
Interior Stains or Corrosion
❑
®
Drains or Sumps
❑
®
Wastewater Discharges
❑
®
Septic or Sewage Tanks
❑
®
Pits, Ponds or Lagoons
❑
®
Pools of Liquid or Standing Water
❑
®
Solid Waste Dumping/Landfills/Suspect Fill Material
❑
®
Stained Soil or Pavement
❑
®
Stressed Vegetation
❑
®
Drinking Water Wells
16
B-18
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
September 8, 2010
Hazardous Substances
The use of hazardous substances on site is primarily limited to the public works
maintenance building. One small cabinet for the storage of paints, oils, and other
flammable liquids was observed inside the maintenance building. No evidence of spills
or releases was observed. Based on site observation, the use and storage of
hazardous substances on the subject property is not considered to represent a
recognized environmental condition.
Petroleum Products
The use of petroleum products on site is primarily limited to the storage cabinet located
in the public works maintenance building previously discussed above. Two large
propane above -ground storage tanks (discussed below) are also present on the subject
property. Based on site observation, the use and storage of petroleum products on the
subject property is not considered to represent a recognized environmental condition.
Drums
Several drums of soil generated during a previous geotechnical investigation were
observed throughout the southern portion of the subject property. These drums were
observed to be in good condition with no evidence of leaks. While not considered a
recognized environmental condition, it is recommended that these drums be disposed of
in accordance with local waste disposal protocols.
ASTs/USTs
Two large propane ASTs are located on the southern portion of the subject property
near the public works maintenance building. These ASTs are used to supply the
emergency power generator. These ASTs were observed to be good condition and do
not represent a recognized environmental condition.
17
B-19
Summary
Yes
Identified?
No
❑
®
Irrigation Wells
❑
®
Monitoring Wells
❑
®
Odors
❑
®
Other Uses or Conditions of Concern
Hazardous Substances
The use of hazardous substances on site is primarily limited to the public works
maintenance building. One small cabinet for the storage of paints, oils, and other
flammable liquids was observed inside the maintenance building. No evidence of spills
or releases was observed. Based on site observation, the use and storage of
hazardous substances on the subject property is not considered to represent a
recognized environmental condition.
Petroleum Products
The use of petroleum products on site is primarily limited to the storage cabinet located
in the public works maintenance building previously discussed above. Two large
propane above -ground storage tanks (discussed below) are also present on the subject
property. Based on site observation, the use and storage of petroleum products on the
subject property is not considered to represent a recognized environmental condition.
Drums
Several drums of soil generated during a previous geotechnical investigation were
observed throughout the southern portion of the subject property. These drums were
observed to be in good condition with no evidence of leaks. While not considered a
recognized environmental condition, it is recommended that these drums be disposed of
in accordance with local waste disposal protocols.
ASTs/USTs
Two large propane ASTs are located on the southern portion of the subject property
near the public works maintenance building. These ASTs are used to supply the
emergency power generator. These ASTs were observed to be good condition and do
not represent a recognized environmental condition.
17
B-19
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment September 8, 2010
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Electrical or Mechanical Equipment Suspected to Contain PCBs
Several pad -mounted transformers were observed throughout the exterior portions of
the subject property. The transformers appeared to be in good condition with no
evidence of leaks or staining. The presence of these transformers on the subject
property does not represent evidence of a recognized environmental condition.
5.3.2 UTILITIES
Utility systems identified at the property are summarized below:
• Facility heating is provided by electric resistance space heaters located
throughout the various buildings. Air conditioning units are limited to a few
locations serving computer server rooms and are all electrically powered.
• Sewage disposal at the property is provided through municipal sources.
• Potable water at the property is obtained through municipal sources.
5.4 PAST USES
Our interpretation of the past uses of the property is tabulated below.
Summary
Year(s)
Interpreted Property Use
1928-1942
An historic aerial photograph and topographic map depicted
the property to be undeveloped.
1947-1953
Aerial photographs and a historic topographic map depicted
the property to be developed with several small buildings
within a United States Military Reservation.
1965-2005
Aerial photographs and historic topographic maps depicted
the property to be developed with the present day
improvements including the Nike Missile Silos.
By 1979 the Nike missile base had been decommissioned by
the United States Military and turned over to the City of
Rancho Palos Verdes for use as a city hall complex.
2010
Site Reconnaissance: The subject property was developed
with the City of Rancho Palos Verdes City Hall complex.
The subject property was first developed in 1942 as part of the Harbor Defenses of Los
Angeles. The subject property was developed with anti-aircraft fire control and gun
emplacements. In the early 1950's the subject property was developed with
administration and launch facilities for the Nike Ajax and Nike Hercules anti-aircraft
missile systems. As the missile systems became obsolete in the early 1970's the site
was decommissioned and turned over to the city of Rancho Palos Verdes in 1979. The
site has continued to operate at the Rancho Palos Verdes City Hall complex since 1979.
PSI identified no evidence of RECs in the past uses of the property.
18
B-20
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment September 8, 2010
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
6 ADJOINING AND SURROUNDING PROPERTY USAGE
A summary of our interpretation of the current and past uses and conditions of adjoining
and surrounding property based on historical records and observations is provided
below.
Adjoining North
Year(s)
Interpreted Property Use
1928
An historic aerial photograph and topographic map depicted
1976-2005
the property to be undeveloped.
1942-1981
Historical aerial photographs and historical topographic maps
depicted the property to be developed with Hawthorne
Boulevard followed by Vacant land.
1990-2005
Aerial photographs depicted the property to be developed with
Hawthorne Boulevard followed by residential development.
2010
Site Reconnaissance: The subject property was developed
with Hawthorne Boulevard followed by residential
development.
Adjoining East
Year(s)
Interpreted Property Use
1928-1965
Historical aerial photographs and historical topographic maps
depicted the property to be undeveloped.
1976-2005
Historical aerial photographs and historical topographic maps
depicted the property to be developed with tennis courts.
2010
Site Reconnaissance: The subject property was developed
with tennis courts and racquet club.
Adjoining South
Year(s)
Interpreted Property Use
1928-2005
Historical aerial photographs and historical topographic maps
depicted the property to be undeveloped.
2010
Site Reconnaissance: The property was undeveloped.
Adjoining West
Year(s)
Interpreted Property Use
1928-1942
An historic aerial photograph and topographic map depicted
the property to be undeveloped.
1947-1953
Aerial photographs and a historic topographic map revealed
the property to be developed with several small buildings
within a United States Military Reservation.
1965-2005
Aerial photographs and historic topographic maps depicted
the property to be developed with the present day
improvements currently owned and operated by the United
States Coast Guard.
19
B-21
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
September 8, 2010
Adjoining West
Year(s)
Interpreted Property Use
2010
Site Reconnaissance: The property was developed with a
United States Coast Guard Bunker and Communications
Tower.
Current uses of the adjoining properties consist of: Hawthorne Boulevard followed by
residential development to the north, undeveloped land to the south, a racquet club to
the east, and a coast guard communication facility to the west.
The adjoining properties were undeveloped land until the early 1940's when the western
adjoining property was developed as part of the military reservation formerly located on
the subject property. By the mid 1970's the eastern adjoining property was developed
with a racquet club. By 1990, the northern adjoining property, across Hawthorne
Boulevard, was developed with residential development.
PSI identified no evidence of RECs in the current and past uses of adjoining and
surrounding property.
20
B-22
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment September 8, 2010
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
7 ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW
7.1 DATABASE FINDINGS
The distribution of listed sites with respect to the property is tabulated and mapped in
EDR's report, which is appended. PSI did not image EDR's results table into the body
of this report to reduce the chance for transcription errors. The reader is referred to this
table which can be found near the front of EDR's report.
EDR reported unmappable (orphan) listed sites. PSI reviewed the information EDR
provided about these sites, and those that could be field -verified within the AMSD are
discussed in the appropriate section below.
7.1.1 SUBJECT PROPERTY
The subject property was identified in EDR's report as further discussed below.
Facility Name County Sanitation Dist of Los Angeles Map ID No. Al -A2 and A5 -A8
Address 30940 Hawthorne Boulevard Distance Subject Property
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Direction N/A
The subject property was identified on the HAZNET database.
According to the HAZNET database, this facility has disposed of approximately 0.66 tons of aqueous
solutions and 250 tons of household waste to an off-site facility. No reports of spills, releases, or
violations were identified.
Based on the lack of evidence suggesting a latent release of hazardous materials at the subject
property, these listings are not considered to represent a recognized environmental condition in
connection with the subject property.
7.1.2 ADJOINING AND SURROUNDING PROPERTY
EDR reported sites adjoining and surrounding the subject property.
PSI considered most of the listed sites unlikely to impact the subject site, based upon
factors including (but not limited to):
• The nature of the listing,
• The use of the site,
• When the site was listed and its current listed status,
• The developmental density of the setting,
• The distance between the listed and subject sites as related to the distance that
releases are likely to migrate based on local surface and subsurface drainage
conditions,
• The presence of intervening drainage divides, and/or
• The inferred groundwater movement.
21
B-23
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment September 8, 2010
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
PSI's discussion of the remaining site follows.
Point Vicente Map ID No. B12
Facility Name Palos Verdes Drive/Hawthorne
Address Boulevard Distance -
Rancho Palos Verdes, California 90275 Direction Southeast
This facility was identified on the Historic Cal -Sites, Cortese, DEED, and Envirostor Databases. The
United States Army established the Point Vicente Military Reservation and Fire Control Sites as part of
the harbor defenses of Los Angeles between 1942 and 1945. The site consisted of 19 tracts of land
distributed over a 10 -square mile area. While the Nike Missile base located on the subject property
was part of the Point Vicente Military Reservation, the property associated with this listing was actually
a small arms shooting ranch located southwest of the subject property (topographically down -gradient)
south of Palos Verdes Drive currently occupied by the Point Vicente Interpretive Center. In 2002,
approximately 4,800 cubic yards of lead impacted soil were excavated and removed from this facility.
However, The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) deferred its final approval of
the final draft closure report pending the Deed Restriction document submittal and finalization to reflect
the mitigating measures to the existing building location and the asphalt covered areas within the Point
Vicente Interpretive Center. In June of 2006 and Deed Restriction document was filed with the Los
Angeles County Recorder's Office. The current status of this facility is listed as Certified/Operations
and Maintenance on the DTSC Envirostor web page. Based on the down -gradient position of this
facility and separation distance with respect to the subject property, contaminant of concern, and
current regulatory status, this facility is not considered to represent a recognized environmental
condition in connection with the subject property.
7.2 OTHER REGULATORY INFORMATION
PSI submitted Freedom of Information requests to the agency tabulated below.
Response status is also tabulated.
An interview with the administrative assistant at the Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works Environmental Programs Division indicated that a
underground storage tank file for the subject property address had been lost
and/or destroyed. According to their computer database, the status for this
underground storage tank was "closed."
22
B-24
Summary
Response?
Yes No
® ❑
Los Angeles County Public Works Department
❑ ®
Los Angeles County Fire Department -
Public Health Investigations Unit
Note: Response status based on date of report.
An interview with the administrative assistant at the Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works Environmental Programs Division indicated that a
underground storage tank file for the subject property address had been lost
and/or destroyed. According to their computer database, the status for this
underground storage tank was "closed."
22
B-24
Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
PSI Project 0559334
Upper Point Vicente -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
8 INTERVIEWS
8.1 INTERVIEW PARTIES
September 8, 2010
Summary
Name
Affiliation
Role
Ms. Sara Singer
City of Rancho Palos Verdes -Senior
Administrative Analyst
Client Contact
Ms. Carolynn Petru
City of Rancho Palos Verdes -Deputy
City Manager
Key Site Manager/User
Administrative Assistant
Los Angeles County Department of
Public Works
Local Government Official
8.2 INTERVIEW FINDINGS
• Ms. Singer provided PSI with site access instructions and escorted our assessor
during site reconnaissance.
• Ms. Petru provided PSI with basic site information, history, and several historical
reports.
23
B-25
s
r ;pmol. 13:24 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO
� Y i
F
a�k
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
APPLICATION
TO BUREAU OF OUTDOOR RECREATION,
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
March 1, 1976
LADA NIKE SITE 55
POINT VICENTE, RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA
GSA NUMBER 9 -D -Calif -1088
C� s -nta los angeies
('� — mmonica
rancho Iong 1
Palos bescn-
0
�
kverdes
A�c'f/c I—,,-
ocean
—,—ocean
fgJ 002
. p
C-1
04, 03/01 13:24 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO
Qj 003
APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL SURPLUS PROPERTY
FOR PUBLIC - PARK OR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES
PART A
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
40
C-2
04x03/01 13:24 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO IM004
p
T0= Bureau of Outdoor Recreation
Pacific Southwest Regional Office
P.O. Box 36062
450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, California 94102
The undersigned City of Rancho Palos Verdes, hereinafter referred
to as the Applicant or Grantee, acting by and through Leonard G.
Wood, City Manager, City of Rancho Palos Verdes, 30940 Hawthorne
Boulevard, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90274, (213) 377-0360, hereby
makes application to the United States pursuant to Section 203(k)(2)
of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949
(63 Stat. 387), as amended, and in accordance with the rules and
regulations of the Department of the Interior, for the transfer of
the following property which has been declared surplus by the
General Services Administration and is subject to assignment to
the Secretary of the Interior for disposal for public park or rec-
reation purposes:
LADA NIKE Site 55
Point Vicente, Rancho Palos Verdes
GSA Number 9 -D -Calif -1088
80+ acres
The undersigned agrees that this application is made subject to
the following terms and conditions:
1. This application and its acceptance by the Department of the
Interior shall constitute the entire agreement between the Appli-
cant and the Department of the Interior, unless modified in
writing signed by both parties.
2. The descriptions of the property set forth above are believed
to be correct, but any error or omission shall not constitute
ground or reason for non-performance of the agreement resulting
from the acceptance of this application.
3. It is understood that the property is to be conveyed "as is"
and "where is" without representation, warranty, or guaranty as
to quantity, quality, character, condition, size, or kind, or
that the same is in condition or fit to be used for the purpose
intended, and no claim for any adjustments upon such grounds.will
be considered after this application has been accepted.
4. The Applicant agrees to assume -possession of the property
r within 15 days of any written request. given.by the Department of
the Interior after the property has been assigned to the Depart-
ment of the Interior by the General Services Administration.
Should the Applicant fail to take actual possession within such
C-3
04/03/01 13:24 FAX 1 415 744. 4043 NPS PVR PGSO
M
period, it shall nonetheless be charged with constructive
pos-session commencing at 12:01 a.m., local time, of the 16th day
� after such request by the Department of the Interior. The word
"possession" shall mean either actual physical possession or
constructive possession.
[a 005
5. As of the date of assumption of possession of the property,
or the date of conveyance, whichever occurs first, the Applicant
shall assume responsibility for any general and special real and
personal property taxes which may have been or may be assessed on
the property, and to prorate sums paid, or due to be paid, by the
Federal Government in lieu of taxes.
6. As of the date of assumption of possession of the property,
or the date of conveyance, whichever occurs first, the Applicant
shall assume responsibility for care and handling and all risks
of loss or damage to the property, and have all obligations and
liabilities of ownership.
7. The Applicant shall on a mutually agreeable date not later than
30 days after the property has been assigned to the Department of
the Interior, or such longer period as may be agreed upon in
writing, tender to the Department of the Interior, the purchase
price, if a purchase price is due.
8. Conveyance of the property shall be accomplished by an instru-
ment, or instruments, in form satisfactory to the Department of
the Interior without warranty, express or implied, and shall con-
tain reservations, restrictions, and conditions substantially as
follows:
A. That the Grantee shall forever-dse the property in ac-
cordt�+__oe—*�}�+ s a�A icat on, and the 'approve Program
of Utilization included in Part B of this application.
B. That the Grantee shall, within 6 months of the date of
the signing of the Deed of Conveyance, erect and maintain
a sign or marker near the point o£principal access to
the conveyed area indicating that; .the property is a park
or recreation area; has been acquired from the Federal
Government for such use; and is or will be made available
for use by the general public.
c. The property shall not be sold, leased, assigned, or
otherwise disposed of except to another eligible govern-
mental agency that the Secretary of the Interior agrees in
writing can assure the continued use and maintenance of
the property for public park or public recreational pur-
poses subject to the same terms and conditions in the
original instrument of conveyance. However, nothing in
this provision shall preclude the Grantee from providing
related recreational facilities an sees comps i
with the approved program mentioned �un— offer Item A, a OVe,
thraL__'a �concess on agrehird
parties, provided t eprior concurrence of the Secretary
of the Interior in writing is obtained to such agreements.
C-4
0-V03101 13:25 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO 0 006
_. 3.
D. Biennial reports setting forth the use made of the prop-
erty during the preceding two-year period shall be pre-
pared by the Grantee and submitted to the appropriate
Regional Office of the Bureau of outdoor Recreation whose
return address appears on the transmittal letter to you,
for ten consecutive reports and as further determined'by
the Secretary of the Interior.
E. If at any time the United States of America shall deter-
mine that the premises herein conveyed, or any part there-
of, are needed for the national defense, all right, title
and interest in and to said premises, or part thereof
determined to be necessary to such national defense, shall.
'evert to•and become the property of the United States of
America.
F. The Federal Government shall have the right to reserve
all oil, gas, and mineral rights.
G. Title to the property transferred shall revert to the
United States at its option in the event of non-compliance
with any of the terms and conditions of disposal.
9. The Program of Utilization included in Part.B of the applica-
tion may be amended, at the request of either the Applicant or the
Federal Government, with the written concurrence of the other
party. Such amendments will be added to,pLnd.become a mart of _the
original app ca 'on arnd shall bs consist_ent w .th__.pyrposes for which
the roperty was cans_erred. The Applicant further agrees to fur-
nish sucl data, maps, reports, and information as may be needed by
the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation.
10. Any title evidence which may be desired by the Applicant will
be procured by the Applicant at its sole cost and expense. The
Federal Government will, however, cooperate with the Applicant or
its authorized agent in this connection, and will permit examina-
tion and inspection of such deeds, abstracts, affidavits of title,
judgements in condemnation proceedings, or other documents re-
lating to the title of the premises and property involved as it
may have available. it is understood that the Federal Government
will not be obligated to pay for any expense incurred in connection
with title matters of survey of the property.
11. The Applicant shall pay all taxes imposed on this transaction
and shall obtain at its own expense and affix to all instruments
®f conveyance and security documents such revenue and documentary
stamps as may be required by Federal and local law. All instru-
ments of conveyance and security documents shall be recorded within
30 days of their receipt in the manner prescribed by local re-
cording statutes at the Applicant's expense.
12. "Assurance of .Compliance with the Department of the Interior
110 Regulations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964"
C-5
04.03/01 13; 25 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS P{VR PG50
4.
The following agreement is made by the applicant
in consideration of and for the purpose of ob-
taining the transfer of any -or all property covered
-by this application and the applicant recognizes
and agrees that any such transfer will be made by
the United states in reliance on said agreement.
The applicant agrees that (1) the program for or
in connection with which any property covered by
this application as transferred to the applicant
will be conducted in compliance with, and the appli-
cant will comply with and require any other person
(any legal entity) who through contractual or other
arrangements with the applicant is authorized to
provide services or benefits under said program to
comply with, all requirements imposed by or pursuant
to the regulations of the Department of the Interior
(43 CFR Part 17) issued under the provisions of
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; (2) this
agreement shall be subject in all respects to the
provisions of said regulations; (3) the applicant
will promptly take and continue to take such action
as may be necessary to effectuate this agreement.;
(4) the United States shall have -the right to seek
Judicial enforcement of this agreement; and (5) this
agreement shall be binding upon -the successors and
assigns of the applicant.
it is agreed that the instrument effecting the trans-
fer to the applicant of any property covered by this
application will contain provisions satisfactory to
the United States incorporating the substance of the
foregoing agreement, -such provisions to consist of
(a) a condition, coupled with a right reserved to the
United states to cause the property to revert to the
United States in the event of any breach of such con-
dition, and (b) a covenant running with the land.
Dated:
February 27, 1976
NM
Cit -manner
Title
30940 Hawthorne Boulevard
Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90274
(Address of Applicant)
C-6
04/0 . 3/01 13:25 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO
ACCEPTANCE BY THE GOVERNMENT
IN
92
Accepted by and on behalf of the United states of America this
day of 19
DEPARTMENT OF THE -ERIOR
By
UO
[A 008
04/03/01 13:25 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO
PART B
JUSTIFICATION Or PROPERTY ACQUISITION
AND DEIMLOPMENT PROGRAM
la 009
rA-01rol
•
041 03/01 13:26 FAX 1 415 744 4045 NPS PWR PGSO X 010
m
PROPOSED ACQUISITION
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes proposes to utilize the following
portions of they surplus Federal property LADA NIKE SITE 55 for
park and recreation purposes:
A. 74.7 acre (or that portion of the main site that is nom
istration area, the fire station area, and the hos , ge.es
ounty Department of Beaches area) portion s rounding
Proposed civic center area to be maintained s.v
open space. 6+ ac o ion are designated
for
otential active recreation ores, but to be use 3-n
the interim for passive open space, - B. 4.49 acre site, formerly the Integrated Fire Control (IFC)
area, a parcel separate from the main site, located proxi-
mate to the intersection of Crest Road and Crenshaw : �G. cz2Ro
Boulevard for a neighborhood park.
Figures 1 and 2 indicate the approximate locations of the requested
portions of the site. No legal descriptions are available at this
time. These figures also show existing buildings, roads, ease-
ments, etc.
The other portions of the main site are proposed to be acquired by
the City and other public agencies under a coordinated use plan:
There is no known disagreement among these agencies.
C-9
04/,03/01 13:26 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO Oil
C-10
04/0 . 3/01.. 13:26 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO 16012
,... DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
The discussion below provides summary descriptions of the various
aspects of the physical setting of the site. The report on pos-
sible reuse possibilities prepared for the City of Rancho Palos
Verdes and funded by the Economic Development Administration is
included in the Appendix of this application and provides more de-
tail on the physical setting.
1. Soil Conditions
The NIKE site is composed of two. soil types, Altamont clay
loam and Altamont clay adobe. Both types have a relatively low
beariner strength, and exhibit adverse'shrink-swell behav or.
sequently, both are somewhat unsuitable for support or high-rise
structures or dense development, especially when associated with
slopes of 10% or more.
2. Slope Conditions
Most of the main NIKE site falls within two slope classes:
(aj 0-10% slope and (b) 10-25% slope, the first slope category,
is suitable for development. The second category presents
problems for construction and environmental protection: water run -
'r"' off is difficult to control, grading cuts must be more extreme, and
so forth. As noted above, when Altamont clan loam and Altamont
clay adobe are,associated with slopes exceeding 10 soi ins -
ility Prn�ac a• 1�ro�„�, b____1��,
Three major parts of the main site have slopes of less than
10% and therefore are suitable for development. The NIKE site ad-
ministration buildings are located in one.of these areas and the
rifle range in another.
it is also important to note that portions of the main NIKE
site are "sea cliff" hazard areas, as designated by the General
Plan and the Southern Coastal Zone Commission. The Commission has
designated lands to be in this hazard category if they are located
above a 20% slopes line drawn from the coastline. According to
Commission standards, these areas should not be used for develop-
ment unless a detailed study of -the specific area reveals that it
is suitable and safe for development. This area is not., however,
in the portion being requested by the City in this application,
The upper 4.49 acre portion is generally level, with the ex-
isting structures located on top of a terrace formation.
3. Hydrology
�.� The soil types of the site have low permeability and porosity.
°''"' Therefore, control of rain runoff and erosion must be considered.
C-11
0 203101.`13:26 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PIVR PGSO [a013
9.
r.
4. Landslide Potential
Approximately 1.5 miles east of the main site is an area
which is an active landslide, Portuguese Bend. The NIKE site
itself is considered to be an area of "moderate ground response►t
characteristics. Although areas in this category are not expected
to experience landslides or liquefaction, City and County stand-
ards recommend that seismic and soil reports be prepared for such
an area prior to high --cost, high -occupancy, or.critieal use develop-
ment.
5. Wildlife and Plant Habitat Considerations
The Southern Coastal Zone Commission and the City have iden-
tified wildlife and plant habitat areas for protectioh and presenta-
tion. That portion of the main site which is on the ocean side o€ -
Palos Verdes Drive falls within a "Class I Priority" zone. The.
habitat•types deemed worthy of protection are the tidal pool areas,
the coastal sagebrush, and the seacliff zones. The area on the
inland side of Palos Verdes Drive is generally covered by vegeta-
tion which is not considered endangered but is worthy of protection
in its natural state.
6. Location and Surrounding Land Use Consideration
Generally, the land contiguous to the main NIKE site has not
been densely developed. The site is bordered on the southwest by
a Coast Guard Station which operates a lighthouse and a radio
facility. It is bordered on the south by a strip of coastline
about 300 feet wide which is owned by the Los Angeles County De-
partment of Beaches; this strip is -used as a fishing access route
from the top of the sea cliff, which is 150-200 feet above sea
level', down to the beach below Palos Verdes Drive.
The land directly to the east of the main site is occupied
by the Salvation Army training school and headquarters and that
to the southeast by Marineland, a commercial recreational'faeility,
now owned by Twentieth Century Fox Corporation. A portion of the
northern border of the site adjoins land developed for single-
fa,mily homes and the Golden Cove shopping area.. The remainder of
the northern border is contiguous to undeveloped land.
The upper site -is bounded by'a single family residential area
to the east and vacant land, zoned for single family residential
use, on all other sides.
7. Transportation Facilities
The main site is bisected by Palos Verdes Drive, one of the
major arterial roads serving the Palos Verdes Peninsula.. This.
four -lane -road with divider strip is a proposed, scenic highway
and also the route'of a proposed bikeway. The arterial provides
spectacular open vistas over the Pacific Ocean at numerous points.
C-12
04103/01 13:27 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO [a 014
10.
�.... A traffic count made in 1973 measured a total 24-hour traffic
volume of about 98.00 vehicles. The peak hour traffic registered
877 vehicles.
The main site is served by a second major arterial, Hawthorne
Boulevard, which intersects Palos Verdes Drive only a few hundred
feet north of the site. Hawthorne Boulevard is a four -lane road
with a 24-hour traffic volume of about 10,000 vehicles at a point
near the site. The peak hour volume is about 1000 vehicles.
Thus, Palos Verdes Drive and Hawthorne Boulevard at present
provide adequate automobile access to the site. As is true of
the Los Angeles area as a whole, there is no "mass transit" service
to the site.
The upper site is served by a major arterial, Crenshaw Boile
yard. This arterial stops, however, at the site entrance and
cannot be extended in the foreseeable future due to the active
landslide area to the south.
8. Existing Structures
At present there are six major buildings on the main NIKE site.
The site has additional facilities associated with its former
military use, including underground missile storage silos and at-
tenda4t fuel, test, and assembly areas. There are also pre -World
r~ war II shore gun emplacements, Coast Guard radio antennas, and
miscellaneous activity areas related to the requirements of a
NIKE installation. Lastly, on that part of the site west of Palos
Verdes Drive there is, as•noted above, a rifle range. • Almost
the entire site is bounded with chainlink fence.
The upper site contains five major buildings and served as
a radar control station as part of the NIKE base facilities.
The facilities are situated on top of a knoll having a precipitous
slope to the southwest and facing the ocean and are fenced with
chainlink fence,
Figures 3, 4, and 5 show the main and upper sites with
existing buildings (buildings are further described in the Appendix,
by number).
C-13
04(03/01 13:27 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO 1M015
r�
NEED
A. Existing and Proposed Facilities
Recreational activity areas in Rancho Palos
sites which have been set aside or are proposed
or passive use. These sites are structured to
allow specific site activities to take place.
11.
Verdes include
for either active
various degrees to
The following groups recreational facilities into active rec-
reational areas and passive recreational areas. This grouping
was utilized in order to most accurately reflect the intensity
and type of site use provided by an individual facility. A fur-
ther breakdown within active/passive groundings organizes recrea-
tional facilities under the level of government which controls. -and. -
operates the. facility.
1. Active Recreational Areas
Active recreational facilities include 205 acres of structured
recrea s• however, only 176 acres are developed and 165
acres of that is a County golf ,ourtea. Consequently, there is
presently only one small developed community park. The total ac-
reage figure does not include a significant amount of recreational
areas supplied by Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District
facilities. It is difficult to calculate the acres supplied by
existing and proposed school sites. Prior to incorporation of the
City, the County did not require parkland or fees to serve new
development and residents were forced to rely on the use of school
facilities.
a. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District Facilities
Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School. District is the largest
supplier of public active recreational facilities within the
City. The School District provides these facilities for many age
levels in the form of open play areas, paved court areas, gymna-
siums, etc. Tennis courts are available on a first-come, first-
served basis. All other activities, such as baseball and foot --
ball, must be arranged in advance. It can be assumed that inter-
mediate and high school sites contain facilities which fulfill
the needs of .young adults and adults, while elementary schools
provide recreational activities designed for the young. The City
is operating a summer program at Miraleste Pool and constructed
tennis courts at Miraleste High School under agreement with the
School District.
b. Los Angeles County Facilities
Los Verdes Golf Course is'a fully developed 165 acre site
which is operated by the County. This facility contains a'18 hole,
par 32 course with associated facilities (clubhouse, banquet facil-
ities, coffee shop, lounge, pro shop, two comfort stations, locker
and shower rooms, and parking for 300 cars).
C-14
03/63/01 13:27 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO f�J 016
c. Rancho Palos Verdes Facilities
Rancho Palos Verdes Park RM141,PARMC
This fully developed 11 acre City park contains highly
structured activity areas. These consist of sports activities,
children's play apparatus, picnic facilities, concession potential,
and a recreational activity building. Recreational programs are
provided at the park activity building. These programs are de-
signed to offer activities for a wide range of age groups (3 years
to senior citizen) and are presently operating at full capacity.
Crestmont Park fl sEr4le<
Crestmont Park is a 29 acre site which fronts on Hawthorne
Boulevard between Verde Ridge Road and Locklenna Lane. This site'
is one of three sites that has been declared surplus by the Palos
Verdes Peninsula unified School District. The purchasing of this
site by the City will take place over a five year period and is
planned to be developed into anactive Asishborhood park. Facil-
ity development ntay initially be prove ed by private organizations
in order to eliminate financial burdens that would usually fall on
the community. No plans have been developed.
2. Passive Recreational Areas
a. Los Angeles County Facilities
Friendship Park
This,123 acre park site, of which 97 ac es are within the
City, is on the eastern boundary of Rancho Palos Verdes, just,
north of Twenty-fifth Street. Designed use capacity of this park is
approximately 1000 persons, with access being obtained from out-
side the City, off Ninth Street. The purpose of Friendship bark
is to provide a public facility which will give upland recreation-
al usage near shoreline areas. Development plans call for con-
struction of moderate day -use facilities, various scenic vista
points, a nature trail, and minimal landscaping. The southwest
corner of the park is designated as a landslide hazard.
Shoreline Park
Shoreline Park consists of a 53 acre park which lies adja-
cent to the eastern boundary of the City, between the shoreline
and Twenty-Fi.f•,h street. Preliminary development plans propose
light day use facilities.
Abalone Cove
This park includes 82 acres, located along the south side
of Palos a—r—des Div'Bo—u-tfi—b—eUween• Sea Cove and Peppertree Drives.
The partially developed beach area park was only recently ac-
quired by the County and one portion opened to the public the
summer of 1975.
C-15
04/03/01 13:28 PAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO
M
13.
This facility will be primarily a nature study area,
rather than a high density bathing beach. The only improvements
have been reinforcing and modification of existing improvements
(paddle tennis courts, parking lots, picnic areas, associated
buildings, and infrastructure systems) where they needed repair
or were below standards, and the installation of four portable
lifeguard stations. The headlands and other tidal reef areas
will be closed at minus tides except to guided or monitored walks
in special.environmental corridors.
Point Vicente Fishing Access
Point Vicente Fishing Access Lies on the ocean side of
Palos Ver4es Drive South, between Point Vicente Lighthouse and
Marineland. The fishing access is a fully developed 1,1 acre site
which provides access to the shoreline for fishing and scuba -••
diving purposes.
Lower Nike Site
is presently leasof
lower Nike Site for a limited recreation facili
move the present r
range
ive
house. The County intends to re-
develop light day use facility.
b. City Facilities
Highland Park
Highland park is•being purchased by the City from Palos
Verdes School District in conjunction with the Crestmont park
site. It is intended for this 17 acre site to remain primarily
in a natural state for the next few years. At a later date, this
site will be developed into a passive recreational park with
limited facilities. No plans have been developed.
B. Future Demand for Recreational and Open Space
The Palos Verdes -Peninsula has been one of the fastest growing
areas in Los Angeles County; its population has doubled in each
decade from 1940 to 1970. By 1970, the population bf the Penin-
sula had reached nearly 65,000, having increased at an annual
rate of 8.1% during the 1960s. The bulk of this growth occurred
in the unincorporated County area of the Peninsula,•including
the adjacent area to the east near Western Avenue which had an
increase during the decade from 14,453 persons in 1960 to over
40,000 in 1970. The three ,incorporated communities of the Penin-
sula experienced slower growth during this period and accounted
for a combined population of approximately 22,000 persons by -1970.
C-16
14. a /�
Since 1970 there has been a marked slowdown of growth on the
Palos Verdes Peninsula. Due to declining in -migration to Los
Angeles County overall, economic downturns, and more restrictive
growth policies on the Peninsula, population growth for the Penin-
sula declined to 3.0 percent annually during -the 1970-1973 period.
Population growth was down significantly in each Peninsula city
and most significantly in the unincorporated County area, which
had a decline in annual growth rates from over 11 percent in the
1960s to 3.8 percent in the early 1970s.
Rancho Palos Verdes had a population of 37,800 persons (esti-
mated by the Los Angeles Regional Planning Commisslon) as of the
date of its incorporation, September 1973. The estimated 1960 pop-'
ulation of the area which isnow incorporated into Rancho Palos i
Verdes was approximately 1.0,000 persons, indicating nearly a four-
fold increase in 13 years. As in the rest of the Peninsula, pop---
ulation growth has slowed considerably since 1970, dropping from
13 percent annually during the 1960s to 3.2 percent in the early
1970s.
For the future, the expectation of continued growth is re-
flected in population and housing growth projections for the Palos
Verdes Peninsula. The demand potential•for residential housing
in Rancho Palos Verdes is expected to increase 2.5% on an average
annual basis from 1970-1990. These estimates reflect demand po-
tential considered in light of the amount of'land which will be
'"'••
available for development of housing, and in light of public poli-
cy considerations.
Households in the Peninsula area are significantly larger
than in most communities in Los Angeles county. In 1970, average
household size for the Peninsula was 3.75 members, compared to
2.83 persons per household in Los Angeles County as a whole.
Larger household sizes are typical of suburban areas with large
families, limited rental housing, and fewer non -family households.
Household size in Peninsula communities has remained fairly stable
in recent years.
Like most growing suburban••areas, Rancho Palos Verdes is
characterized by a high proportion of children under 20 years of
age and parents age 30 to 54. Correspondingly, there is a rela-
tively low proportion of persons over 65 living in the area.
Forty-five percent of the population of Rancho Palos -Verdes is
under 20 years of age; nearly 42 percent is between the ages of
30 and 54; and only 2.5 percent is over 65 years of age. Resi-
dents of Rancho Palos Verdes are on average slightly younger
than Palos Verdes Peninsula residents as a whole. The median age
of Rancho Palos Verdes residents is 28.8 years, compared to 29.9
years for all Palos Verdes Peninsiula residents.
Incomes in Palos Verdes Peninsula communities ware substan-
tially higher than Los Angeles County averages in both 1960 and
19.70_ -Median family income for .the Peninsula rose from $13,770
in 1960 to $24,930 in 1970, a percentage increase of 81 percent.
C-17
04/03/01 13:28 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO
Im 019
Family income of Rancho Palos Verdes residents was slightly
lower than that of other Palos Verdes community residents in both
1960 and 1970. Median family income in Rancho Palos Verdes in-
creased 73 percent during the decade to $21,803 in 1970. The
highest income area on the Peninsula was Rolling Hills, with a
median family income of $36,379 in 1970.
There are two aspects to the demand for recreational and open
space. First, there is the regional demand, generated by the pop-
ulation of the greater Los Angeles area. Regional demand relates
to major park and recreational areas which offer the visitor an
opportunity for a variety of recreational experiences. With the
rapid disappearance of the supply of public open space in the Los
Angeles area and, at the same time, the demand increasing, an im-
balance between demand for and supply of recreational area is evi-
dent throughout the area. In contrast, thence is a local demand
for recreational and open space, which is generated by the popu-
lation of the Palos Verdes Peninsula and the City of Rancho Palos
Verdes in particular. The loc elates to the need for
areas for passive activ ty as well as -active recreational areas such
as ball fields-, tennis courts, etc., and other types of facilities.
As indicated in the previous section, approximately 176 devel-
oped acres are available for active recreational activity (exclu-
sive of school sites). Since 165 acres of this are a golf course,
only 10 acres can be considered a developed community park. Using
the generally accepted standard of four acres per 1000 population
�-� for local needs, an existing deficit, with an existing population
of nearly 42,000, of over 150 acres is evident. While this does
not include the use of school sites as recreational areas, which
would -tend to reduce the deficit, it also presumes that the cur-
rently undeveloped County facilities adjacent to and within Rancho
Palos Verdes will be developed to planned levels.
Currently the General Plan of Rancho Palos Verdes provides for
an additional 1,710 acres for residential development, and approxi-
mately 8000-9000 additional people. Utilizing the same standard
for future needs, another 40 acres will be needed in addition to
the existing deficit.
he ilXZation of the 4.49 acre upper site and approxi-
crrY mate 6 . acres of tie 1 x s i more ac eve rec-
?_bM('V15'M'7ot( y
rea Iona ac IVI Ies wou .egin o overcame t e Curren eficit
an to meet the future needs ot the City.
The additional 68.1 acres of proposed assive is
base upon both the need for a-d-ditional open space as well as con-
sideration of environmental factors associated with this portion
of -the site. A$ in Gated in the environmental assessment of the
site (see Appendix), the sensitivity of this portion of the site
dictates -a low level of � development.
C-18
W4.103101 13:29. FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO 0 020
16.
The particular sites chosen for open space and recreation
land would provide needed activity areas for the resident popu-
lation. Their location in the western.poxtion of the Palos Verdes
Peninsula, in and adjacent to the coastal zone along the Pacific,
would provide recreation areas in proximity to a large portion of
the resident population. The anticipated volume of use ofe.
sites woul ited the sanaitiLvity of the land itself --
t epotential active recreational area at the main site might
eventually have annual volumes at full development of 60400,
significantly less for the open space areas., and 30,000 for the
upper neighborhood site.
.An identified need of the current and future -recreation pro-
gram is for building space for recreation classes and organized
group meetings. At present, Rancho Palos Verdes City park has
one building which is used for this purpose, plus staff offices.
This facility is small and is used to capacity. There are many
community groups seeking space for their activities.. Some would
be'willing to donate time and money to the City to provide space
for cooperative use.
There are no usable structures on that portion of the main
site for which applIgation is being. made. The upper site contains
five main structures. One of these can be eliminated from poten-
tial use due to its type of construction. The other four struc-
tures could provide space for recreation programs and group meet-
�.ings, compatible with the concept of a neighborhood park facility.
'The need exists,, but the major question is the suitability of the
particular structures and costs of renovation and maintenance.
LVE
C-19
0.4/03/01 13;29 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO 9 021
17.
SUITABILITY
Those portions of the site that have been requested for use as
either active or passive recreational areas by the City are based
upon the demand for additional acreage generated by the added pop-
ulation as well as an assessment of the site suitability. As can
be seen by examination of the Re -use report tin the Appendix), al-
ternative uses of the site have been examined with the full partici-
pation of other interested public agencies in mind. It appears
that the best "mix" of uses for the site would be as an adminis-
trative site for a number of public agencies with.the open space
and recreational portions being administered by the City of Rancho
Palos Verdes and Los Angeles County.
Perhaps the single most important resource relating to the site and
its vicinity are the superb views to the site and panoramic vistas
from it. Point Vicente and the site of the proposed Civic Center
are significant focal points which are highly visible from a number
of vantage points in the surrounding area. In addition, these focal
points afford excellent 2700 "view sheds" of the coastline and ocean.
The point will offer exceptional views of surrounding marine habi-
tats, surface geology,'and additionally, vantage points to view
the annual migration of the California Gray Whale. views to the
site are of considerable importance because these focal points are
architectural features which tend to focus viewer attention from
a variety of view locations along major -public routes and lands.
Because of these considerations as well as the recommended designa-
tion of Palos Verdes Drive as a scenic corridor and highway, visual
.qualities of proposed development should be compatible with local
characteristics and should take advantage of, but not obstruct,
views from nearby vantage points. /
In the examination of possible uses for the site ortions
ere me evi en a on a small portion of the main
stte—shoTlIZ-Fe—utilized for intense urban uses such as an ac�minis-
trativ a for public functions. After the identi ica ion of
ifiTs—pottion of the site, the remainder of the site, because of
its environmental sensitivity and the strong demand for recreation
and open space areas, was identified for such recreational uses.
The proposed city recreation area adjacent to Palos Verdes Drive
was chosen because it represented topographically the best por-
tion of the site for potential active recreation activities and
its adjacency to Palos Verdes Drive means that ;Lngress and egress
to the proposed recreational area can be readily provided by con-
struction of -an access road off of Palos Verdes Drive.
The.major access point to the main sate will continue in its pre-
sent location from Hawthorne Boulevard. It is proposed to nego-
tiate with GSA for a road right-of-way designed to provide access
for all agencies using the main site.
The of the land requested by the City of Rancho Palos Verdes
at the main site will-remaln.-essenti-a-1 an X s natural state.
ative around coax w e maintained in those areas not desig-
C-20
04/03/01 13:30 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO 1M022
18.
nated for recreational purposes. In areas where native and intro-
'.,.•, duced species are necessary for slope control or for visual ef-
. 4 7 1 1.n co9 -^4 A-FvrMn ayliA nl_j_ft1al-M _ arnnion
prevention varieties. No ingress and egress to this portion of the
site wall a rea containin a
DMTFAffTE11—Jfy_`w-J._t_H_the, open space use and trails.
The portions of the main site proposed for recreational and open
space use by the City do not include existing physical improve-
ments'of use and would require demolition. This includes several
gatehouses or control stations, theatre building (T-8), generator
building (5-201), kennels,•and chainlink fence. The vast missile
storage and launching area present a still unsolved problem. The
ground level concrete area will lend itself to providing a visfa
The un er oun area mictht provMa—r..T)ace-for-i--re—.Creatign_Mle, but
nothing is proposed at this time. on theL_other hand, these under-
�rround areas maw need to be permanently sealed off".
The upper site of 4.49 acres contains structures and facilities
associated with its former role as an Integrated Fire Control (IFC)
Center. The recreational uses proposed will leave the existing
topography and much of the existing vegetation intact. Further-
more, the low level of outdoor use'by these activities will not
be threatened by adverse geological conditions. Finally, these
- activities will, if the proper landscape design is instituted, en-
hance the visual quality of the area. Sour of the existing build-
ings might be suitable for use for recreation programs and meeting
rooms. The City would like to keep the flexibility of further
evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of utili2ing some or all of the
four buildings and the platform or of demolishing all of them and
making the site totally passive. The guard house, small storage
building, building S-310, and the chainlink fence would be removed.
�J
The upper site contains a joint use access easement. This easement
is not incompatible with the proposed park use. The existing
access drive would be continued.
C-21
64'03/01 13:30 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO 0 023
19.
CAPABILITY
As a newly incorporated City (1973), Rancho Palos Verdes is in
the initial stage of developing a City administrative and support
structure to accommodate the service needs for an estimated cur-
rent population of nearly 42,000 and the ability to meet the
needs of an ultimate pQyulation of approximaThe
City does not yet have a capital improvements program.
Currently, the City contracts with Los Angeles County for a number
of services, including police, roads, animal control, building and
safety, engineering, and recreation services. The operating bud-
get for the current fiscal year (1975-76) for recreation services
is $125,000 (see Appendix). This budget includes park adminis-
tration, grounds maintenance, and construction and repair, with
a staff of two full-time and 26 part-time personnel. It - is antici-
pated that eventually the City might take over all operatipns re-
lated to the providing of recreation services.
In terms of capital budgets related to the acquisition and de-
velopment of recreation and -open space sites, the City is in the
process of acquiring -two surplus school sites from the Palos Verdes
Unified School District'to increase the supply of recreational land.
To initiate the purchase of the Crestmont and Highland School
Sites, $405,500 has been provided in the Capital Improvements and
.-�,. Acquisition Fund in fiscal year 1975-76 for the first installment
'�. on these sites. For fiscal 1975-76, funds were transferred from
surplus in the general fund, - the Environmental Excise Tax Fund,
and the Revenue Sharing Fund to the Capital Improvements Fund. Ad-
ditionally, monies totaling $100,000 for design studiep related
to parkland development were appropriated and included -in this
fund.
H
The major sources of funds for acquisition and development of
parkland are the Environmental Excise Tax and Parkland Dedication
from subdivisions. At the present time, there is an unappropri-
ated balance of $862,927 in the Environmental Excise Tax Fund.
There is interest on the part of several community groups for
working with the City to develop these facilities, The City is,
however, committed to a fiscal philosophy,of carefully programming
future long-range costs, rather than only short-range expendiency.
This analysis, relative to volunteer resources, has not been ac-
complished, since acquisition of the site was uncertain.
Recently, a Parks and Recreation Committee was appointed by the
City Council to provide pglicy guidance for the development of
recreational land and programs.
C-22
... ... ....
01/03/01 13:30 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO Q024
20.
pARKrAND RECREATION ORGANTZATTOh CHART
City Council
-Parks & Recreation Committee
City Manager
Parks a Recreation Dept. Public Works
(contract)
4
C-23
04x'03/01 13:30 PAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO a 025
21.
PROGRAM OF UTILIZATION
The City of Rancho -Palos Verdes proposes to develop approximately
80 acres of the 115 acre surplus NIKE site for a variety of rec-
reational and open space uses. Figures 6 and 7.show the portions
to be acquired for parkland in relation to other proposed uses for
the remainder of the site. At the Lmain site th
tial active recreational area would complement t e proposed Los
Angeles County Department of Beaches development on the coast side
of Palos'Verdes Drive as well as meeting an .identified need for
additional recreational land in the City. The acres of passive
-open space surrounds and complements the ro trat ve
center n ro eed n space y.
The 4.49 acre upper site would be used primarily as a neighborhood
park capitalizing on the dramatic views from this location. _.
L
CSR° 1. Potential Active Recreational Area at Main Site (Figure -6)
Eventually, ai.n picnic ar�a�- t�nn3.s
courts, and an athletic field. This multi -use area will be for 6N
ay use only.
Road access will be provided off of Palos Verdes Drive with
a paved parking lot to serve the picnic areas, tennis courts and
athletic field. Development of this site would potentially occur
over'*a five-year period based on funding priorities. In the in-
terim it would be used as open space. No structures exist on this
portion of the site.
2.' Passive Open Space at Main Site (Figure 6)
of
3.niti onl vista and picnic areas and tram Additianal�and
scaping would be plante o en ance a native growth. A parking
area would be added in the future. All existing structures on
-- this portion would be demolishe�,L_ Tlie missile storage aria-C�aunch-
Tffg--arca `w45U7rd--be used ground area , with the
-admit- o Telescopes and benches. It could also be used by
organized groups as well as individuals for such activities as
whale watching, coastal study, etc.
3. Upper Site (Figu're 7)
Development at this site includes minor landscaping and es-
tablishment of picnic areas. The parking lot would be expanded
in the future.- A level playing area would be established between
the street and the parking iota Two alternatives exist for the
existing. structures..-*. (1)-, Demolish all, landscape,' and use area.
only.for picnics, viewing, etc.,
n . (2). Renovate (with the coopera-
tioof community groups) One'to'foui existing structures'
(S-302, S-303, S-304, S-307), demolishing the other structures,
and use for recreation programs and group meetings as well as for .
C-24
04/03/01 13:31 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO Q 026
22,
picnics, viewing, etc. The City wishes to keep these two alterna-
tives as feasible approaches at this time.
The CiV would be r ihlcq f ately 75 ac
recreational and open space land at the main NIKE site and 4.5
ac r sate on Crenshaw Boulevard. It has been as -
sum r purposes of fiscal impact analysis that there will be
no cost of acquisition; thus, the City would bear only development
and maintenance costs. it is estimated that during a give -year
period, beginning 1978-711-Aimat 132 000 will be required
for develo t o acre area including sorts e
nic areas and tennis courts (Table Maintenance during the
same period -for this developed area will start at rougly $6,000;
by 1982, at full development, the annual cost will approximate
$33,000.
For the larger open space and passive recreational area., it is
again assumed that there will be no site acquisition cost.. Total
development cost is estimated at 584,000'Onn demo it3hn
cost. The maintenance cost would incrsase grades from about
2 ,800 and level off at approximately $14,000 annually.
For the recreational area at the upper site, composed of 4.49
acres, it is estimat4d that for Alternative (1) costs would be
approximately $3,500 for total demolition and $25,000 for develop-
ment, with annual maintenance estimated at•$1,000 per acre. Al-
ternative (2) costs would be approximately $1,500 for partial
demolition and $50,000 for development (primarily in partial reno-
vation of structures), with annual maintenance estimated at $1,500
per acre.
C-25
04/03/01 13:31 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWIZ PGSO 0 027
23.
TALE 1
PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF DEDELOPMENT
Annual Fiscal Reuairements
Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal
Year Year Year * Year Year Year
1975-76 1976-77 1977-78 1979-79 1979-80 1980-81
Developed Recreational
Area (6.6 acres)
Site Acquisition Costsa - - -
Development Costsb - - - $26,400 $26,400$26,400
Maintenance Costsc - 200 200 5,000 10,000 17,000
Open Space and Passive .
Recreational Area (70 ac.)
Site Acquisition Costs? - - - - -
Development Costsd - $23,000 $17,000 .$17,000 $17,000 $17,000
Maintenance Costsa - 2,800 5,600 $,400 11,200 14,000
Recreational Area at
Upper Site (4,9 acres) T
Site Acquisition Costsa - - - - -
Alternative (1)
Demolition - 3,500 - - -
Development Costsf - 500 10,000 10,000 - -
Maintenance Costsg - - 3,000 4,000 4,500 4,500
Alternative (2)
Demolition - 11500 - - - -
Development Costs - 500 15,000 15,000 10,000 10,000
Maintenance CostsII - 500 4,000 5,000 51000 6,700
TOTAL O/Alternative (1) •- $30,000 $35,800 $70,800• $69,100 $78,900
TOTAL fit/Alternative (2) - $28,500 $41,800 $76,800 $79,600 $91,100
a. Assumes 100% discount from Bureau of Outdoor Recreation
b. Assumes total development costs of $132,000 ($20,000 per acre)
c. Assumes maintenance cost of $5,000 per developed acre
d. Assumes total'development cost of $84,000 ($1,200 per acre) + $6,000 demolition
e. Assumes maintenance costs of $200 per acre
f. Assumes total demolition and development conks of $25,000
�. Assumes maintenance costs of $1,000 per acre
" h.' Assumes maintenance costs of $1,500 per acre
C-26
04403191 13:31 FAX 1 415-144 4043 NPS PWR PGSO
%d
jig
OE
:4
028
C 27
04/03/01 13:32 FAX 1 415 744 4043 NPS PWR PGSO
029
figure 2 AMA
upper_ b-ite
n
scale =1"= 200'
-C-28
04/03/01 13:33 PAX 1,415 744 4043 _— NPS PIR PGSO X1033
o
iZT4 �• �d dip
r �
City of Rancho Palos Verdes PROPOSED BOUNDARIES
r`x'nr'
_ - .. '� , .,.. - ♦ !
• o
_ r.
�' r..k 101
1
-M .j ,. ��n. {�i� - �,
� � � ., a Y d'. �. ,�
� f .b � - �. �. � v � Ci FIS� - ,
•� • -� y J ;
w
'S�,_
a
yam.
i • pr r
A
iR',F A y ,X, _ .
li
gk
a
�restM0 t Lr' I
Iwo-
�y
. •-
Icy �'yL
.
,rr
i
ti
mo.
Sit
^
•
. tT�Y��! �'. .� �'. � � 1.
� ��
�j •
�
�
�• 1
f - ~ �...
�
a
'i? _ ..
" _ '
I
�
.i . i
1qw
Ir
W7-
'ri.o
,
i .. w
'•. �, -
k'- SIM. �Yn
�'i1
f,
s �y
_ � a
4 .
.... .. _ _
B �'.
..
� f��`
F
T
-
'�-.nom" ,._ •
i�f
,
a
� l o s V �
c
nw,
-
4 �
t
to
rdcs
afa Verdes Dr S
,. s
• �
rde
. D r
_
r -
-.4
---_._ r
,-. •..-��,�.�.�
fie'
S
� ..,. _ '� :
11
P ,�yC3
f
---
ash �
,'.
pa
�Q �{ Y
s�
0pal
•� t -
-
EXISTING ACREAGE YELLOW - 8.60 AC
)
,•
{
{ `$
1%
E
Vel-has Q+ S �w�
PROPOSED ACREAGE (PINK) = 20.18 AC
-
�
}=. • w .
= 11.58 AC
443.5 p 221.75 443.5 Feet
I
:s City of Rancho Palos '',^ardes
Tlie information on this map is far reference only and may not be up-to•dcr
NA[Y 11$3 State Plane Califomia) FIPS Q4t15 Feet
contact the Gey fur more ink:
D-1
Coast Guard Parcels at Upper Point Vicente
APNs 7573-002-906 & 7573-002-912
E-1