PC RES 2017-008 P.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-08
A RESOLUTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO PALOS VERDES CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW AND MINOR GRADING
PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 1,917FT2 MANUFACTURED
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE, A 600FT2 DETACHED GARAGE, A
WATER STORAGE TANK, AND 50YD3 OF GRADING TO
ACCOMMODATE THE IMPROVEMENTS AT 48 CINNAMON LANE
(CASE NO. ZON2016-00401).
WHEREAS, Andrea Joannou is the property owner of 40 Cherryhill Lane, which was
originally developed with a 1,538ft2 single-family residence and garage; and,
WHEREAS, Andrea Joannou is also the property owner of a vacant lot at 48 Cinnamon
Lane (Lot 12, Block 3, Tract 14195); and,
WHEREAS, the residential improvements on 40 Cherryhill Lane moved several hundred
feet away from its original location to a City owned property due to the Portuguese Bend
Landslide; and,
WHEREAS, on or about November 16, 2012, the City filed a lawsuit captioned People of
the State of California, et al. v. Andrea Joannou, et al., Los Angeles County Superior Court case
no. BC495866 in which the property owner filed a cross-complaint seeking relief; and,
WHEREAS, the City claimed in the lawsuit that the improvements on 40 Cherryhill lot
constituted a nuisance that the property owner had the obligation to abate; and,
WHEREAS, on June 3, 2014, the property owner and the City executed a Settlement
Agreement, settling all claims, which allowed the property owner to replace a house that was
previously located on 40 Cherryhill lot or to build a house on 48 Cinnamon Lane; and,
WHERES, on August 29, 2016, the Community Development Director ("Director")
granted an approval for a Landslide Moratorium Exception Permit, allowing the property owner
to submit the appropriate Planning applications for the placement of a manufactured home,
detached garage, and a detached horse corral on the vacant lot at 48 Cinnamon Lane; and,
WHEREAS, on August 30, 2016, the property owner submitted Site Plan Review, Minor
Grading Permit, and Environmental Assessment applications, requesting approval to place a
manufactured residence and a detached garage with 50yd3 of grading to accommodate the
improvements at 48 Cinnamon Lane; and,
WHEREAS, on September 2, 2016, the application was deemed incomplete due to
insufficient information. After subsequent submittals of additional information by the property
owner and in-concept approvals were granted by the City Geologist, Public Works Department,
and the Fire Department, the application was deemed complete on January 30, 2017; and,
P.C. Resolution No. 2017-08
Page 1 of 7
WHEREAS, on February 2, 2017, notice of the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration and
the proposed Site Plan Review and Minor Grading Permit was sent to all property owners
owning property within 500' of the subject site and appropriate public agencies for a comment
period of 20-days, commencing on February 2, 2017 and concluding on February 22, 2017.
Additionally, the notice was published on the same day in the Palos Verdes Peninsula News;
and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act,
Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et. seq. ("CEQA"), the State's CEQA Guidelines,
California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et. seq., the City's Local CEQA
Guidelines, and Government Code Section 65962.5(f) (Hazardous Waste and Substances
Statement), the City of Rancho Palos Verdes prepared an Initial Study and determined that
there is no substantial evidence that the approval for the Site Plan Review and Minor Grading
Permit would result in a significant adverse effect on the environment, provided appropriate
mitigation measures are imposed on the project. Thus, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was
prepared and notice thereof was given in the manner required by law; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on February
28, 2017, at which time all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard and present
evidence.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS
VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The Planning Commission has independently reviewed and considered
the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, the public comments upon it, and other evidence
and finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in the manner required by law,
and there is no substantial evidence, provided appropriate mitigation measures are imposed,
that the approval of Case No. ZON2016-00401 (Site Plan Review, Minor Grading Permit and
Environmental Assessment) would result in a significant adverse effect upon the environment.
Section 2: There are no sensitive natural habitat areas on the subject site and,
therefore, the proposed project will have no individual or cumulative adverse impacts upon
resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the State Fish and Game Code.
Section 3: With the imposition of the following mitigation measures that address
impacts upon aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology/soils,
hazards/hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, noise, utilities/service systems in the
community and as set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring Program, Exhibit "B", which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, the proposed project's potential significant
impacts will be reduced below a level of significance:
AES-1. The exterior lighting for the proposed residences shall be subject to the provisions of
Section 17.56.030 (Outdoor Lighting for Residential Uses) of the Rancho Palos Verdes
Municipal Code. Prior to the issuance of building permits, all residential lighting shall be
fully shielded, and no outdoor lighting shall be permitted where the light source is
directed toward or results in direct illumination of a parcel of property or properties other
than that upon which such light source is physically located.
AQ-1. During construction, including grading, excavating, and land clearing, storage piles and
unpaved disturbed areas shall be continuously stabilized by being kept wet, treated with
P.C. Resolution No. 2017-08
Page 2 of 7
a chemical dust suppressant, or covered when material is not being added to or
removed from the pile.
AQ-2. During construction, including grading, excavating, and land clearing, sufficient water
shall be applied to areas disturbed to prevent emitting dust and to minimize visible
emissions from crossing the boundary line.
AQ-3. During construction, including grading, excavating, and land clearing, construction
vehicles leaving the site shall be cleaned to prevent dust, silt, mud, and dirt from being
released or tracked off site.
AQ-4. During construction, including grading, excavating, and land clearing, the applicant's
contractor shall be responsible for minimizing bulk material or other debris from being
tracked onto the City's public roadways, and if tracked, the applicant's contractor shall
be responsible for cleaning up the impacted City's public roadways.
AQ-5. During construction, including grading, excavating, and land clearing, no trucks shall be
allowed to transport excavated material off-site unless the trucks are maintained such
that no spillage can occur from holes or other openings in cargo compartments, and
loads are either: covered with tarps; wetted and loaded such that the material does not
touch the front, back, or sides of the cargo compartment at any point less than 6" from
the top and that no point of the load extends above the top of the cargo compartment.
AQ-6. Prior to the issuance of any Grading or Building Permits, the applicant shall demonstrate
to the Community Development Director's satisfaction that dust generated by grading
activities shall comply with the South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403
and the City Municipal Code requirements that require regular watering for the control of
dust.
AQ-7. During construction, including grading, excavating, and land clearing, all excavating and
grading activities shall cease when winds gusts (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 25
mph. To assure compliance with this measure, grading activities are subject to periodic
inspections by City staff.
AQ-8. During construction, including grading, excavating, and land clearing, construction
equipment shall be kept in proper operating condition, including proper engine tuning
and exhaust control systems.
BIO-1. Prior to any grading or permit issuance, vegetation needed to be cleared for fuel
modification shall be offset by the property owner using a 2:1 ratio for CSS, a 0.5:1 ratio
for non-native grassland, and a 3:1 ratio for native grassland as described in the
Council-adopted NCCP for loss occurring in an area greater than 0.3 acres by using one
of the following two methods: 1) With the approval of the City, PVPLC, and the Wildlife
Agencies, the property owner shall dedicate additional acreage to the Palos Verdes
Nature Preserve that will add to the biological function of the Preserve and the property
owner shall provide management funding for the additional acreage according to a
Property Analysis Record or similar method; or 2) Payment of a mitigation fee to the
City's Habitat Restoration Fund, pursuant to the City's NCCP Subarea Plan. If the
revegetation option is selected, the Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy (PVPLC)
shall be hired by the City, at the property owner's expense, to grow and plant the
required vegetation.
P.C. Resolution No. 2017-08
Page 3 of 7
BIO-2. Prior to commencing construction, the construction area shall be clearly delineated with
fencing or other boundary markers. Temporary fencing (with silt barriers) shall be
installed at the limits of Project impacts to prevent habitat impacts and prevent the
spread of silt from the construction zone into adjacent habitats (i.e. Altamira Canyon).
Fencing shall be installed in a manner that does not affect adjacent habitats to be
avoided and in compliance with Section 17.56.020.0 of the RPVMC.
BIO-3. Prior to commencing construction, a pre-grading meeting shall occur to inform the
construction contractor of the biological/jurisdictional constraints (Altamira Canyon) of
this Project. The Project limits shall be clearly marked on Project maps provided to the
construction contractor and areas outside of the Project limits shall be designated as "no
construction" zones.
BIO-4. During construction, construction workers shall strictly limit their activities, vehicles,
equipment, and construction materials to the designated construction limits.
BIO-5. During construction, all equipment maintenance, staging, and dispensing of fuel, oil,
coolant, or any other such activities shall occur in designated areas within the fenced
Project limits. These designated areas shall be located in previously compacted and
disturbed areas, in such a manner to prevent runoff into adjacent areas and shall be
shown on the construction plans. Fueling of equipment shall take place on level surfaces
and contractor equipment shall be checked daily for leaks prior to operation and repaired
as necessary.
BIO-6. During construction, the construction work zone shall be kept as clean of debris as
possible to avoid attracting predators of native and sensitive wildlife. All food-related
trash items shall be enclosed in sealed containers and removed daily from the
construction work zone.
BIO-7. In order to avoid unnecessary impacts, should any non-listed species be found within
the property, they shall be avoided and allowed to leave the Project site on their own
volition, or a qualified biologist shall relocate them outside of the Project site.
BIO-8. Pets of Project personnel shall not be allowed on the Project site during construction.
BIO-9. Prior to any grading or building permit issuance, a qualified biologist shall review the
landscape plans to ensure that that no invasive, non-native plant species are used in
any proposed landscaping. The Landscape Plan shall include a plant palette that
consists of native plants and non-invasive species.
BIO-10.Prior to commencing construction, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
shall be prepared to reduce the potential for accidental releases of fuel, pesticides, and
other materials. This plan shall outline refueling locations, emergency response
procedures, and reporting requirements. During construction, equipment for immediate
cleanup shall be kept at the staging area. This plan shall also include erosion control
measures to control surface runoff, erosion, and sedimentation outside of the project
footprints.
BIO-11.A qualified biologist shall monitor construction during clearing, grubbing, and initial
excavation activities, as needed. The biological monitor shall ensure that, if present,
P.C. Resolution No. 2017-08
Page 4 of 7
nesting birds in the Project vicinity are not impacted (change in normal behaviors) and
that construction workers stay within the designated footprint of the construction work
zone, as delineated by fencing, to avoid trespass on foot or in vehicles into sensitive
habitats, such as Altamira Canyon along the eastern perimeter of the Project site.
BIO-12.The clearance of vegetation during construction shall occur outside of the nesting
season (generally February 1 through September 1). If avoiding the nesting season is
not practicable, the following additional measures shall be employed:
i. A pre-construction nesting survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within 3
days prior to the start of construction activities to determine whether active nests are
present within or directly adjacent to the construction zone. All nests found shall be
recorded.
ii. If construction activities must occur within 300 feet of an active nest of any passerine
bird or within 500 feet of an active nest of any raptor, with the exception of an
emergency, a qualified biologist shall monitor the nest on a weekly basis, and the
construction activity shall be postponed until the biologist determines that the nest is
no longer active.
iii. If the recommended nest avoidance zone is not feasible, the qualified biologist shall
determine whether an exception is possible and obtain concurrence from the
resource agencies before construction work can resume within the avoidance buffer
zone. All work shall cease within the avoidance buffer zone until either agency
concurrence is obtained or the biologist determines that the adults and young are no
longer reliant on the nest site.
CUL-1.Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit, the applicant shall consult with
the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) regarding any known
archaeological sites on or within a half-mile radius of the subject property.
CUL-2.Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit, the applicant shall conduct a
Phase 1 archaeological survey of the property for approval by the Community
Development Director.
CUL-3.Prior to the commencement of grading, the applicant shall retain a qualified
paleontologist and archeologist to monitor grading and excavation. In the event
undetected buried cultural resources are encountered during grading and excavation,
work shall be halted or diverted from the resource area and the archeologist and/or
paleontologist shall evaluate the remains and propose appropriate mitigation measures.
GEO-1.Prior to issuance of any building or grading permit, the applicant shall submit the
additional information required by the City Geologist, including a soils report, and/or a
geotechnical report, for the review and approval of the City Geologist. The applicant
shall comply with any requirements imposed by the City Geologist and shall substantially
repair the geologic conditions to the satisfaction of the City Geologist.
GEO-2.Prior to issuance of any building or grading permit, a Hold Harmless Agreement,
satisfactory to the City Attorney promising to defend, indemnify, and hold the City
harmless from any claims or damages resulting from the requested project, shall be
P.C. Resolution No. 2017-08
Page 5 of 7
submitted to the Community Development Director for recordation with the Los Angeles
County Recorders Office.
GEO-3.Prior to issuance of any building or grading permit, the applicant shall submit for
recordation a covenant, satisfactory to the City Attorney, agreeing to construct the
project strictly in accordance with the approved plans; and agreeing to prohibit further
projects on the subject site without first filing an application with the Director. Such
covenant shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for recordation with
the Los Angeles County Recorders Office.
GEO-4.Prior to issuance of any grading or building permit, the applicant shall prepare an
erosion control plan for the review and approval of the Building Official. The applicant
shall be responsible for continuous and effective implementation of the erosion control
plan during project construction.
HAZ-1.Prior to issuance of a building permit, the new single-family residences and related
accessory structures shall be designed to incorporate all applicable fire protection
requirements of the City's most recently adopted Building Code, to the satisfaction of the
Building Official.
HYD-1.Prior to the issuance of a grading and/or building permit, the applicant shall submit for
review and approval by the City's Building Official an Erosion Control Plan that shall
include BMPs for erosion, sedimentation and run-off control during construction activities
to protect the water quality. Additionally, the Erosion Control Plan shall include post-
construction BMPs that apply to runoff from the future buildings, including roof run-off.
HYD-2.Prior to the issuance of a grading and/or building permit for new construction, the
applicant shall submit and obtain approval of a Drainage Plan by the City's Building &
Safety Division and the City's Public Works Director finding that stormwater runoff as a
result from the development of the subject site is designed to flow and utilize an on-site
drainage system that directs runoff from all buildings and structures on the site shall be
contained and directed to the streets or an approved drainage course. If lot drainage
deficiencies are identified by the Public Works Director, all such deficiencies shall be
corrected by the applicant.
HYD-3.All landscaping irrigation systems shall be part of a water management system approved
by the Public Works Director. Irrigation for landscaping shall be permitted only as
necessary to maintain the yard and garden.
N-1. Permitted hours and days for construction activity are 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM, Monday
through Friday, 9:00AM to 5:00PM on Saturday, with no construction activity permitted
on Sundays or on the legal holidays specified in Section 17.96.920 of the Rancho Palos
Verdes Development Code. During demolition, construction and/or grading operations,
trucks shall not park, queue and/or idle at the project site or in the adjoining street rights-
of-way before 7AM Monday through Friday and before 9AM on Saturday, in accordance
with the permitted hours of construction stated in this condition. When feasible to do so,
the construction contractor shall provide staging areas on-site to minimize off-site
transportation of heavy construction equipment. These areas shall be located to
maximize the distance between staging activities and neighboring properties, subject to
approval by the building official.
P.C. Resolution No. 2017-08
Page 6 of 7
N-2. The project shall utilize construction equipment equipped with standard noise insulating
features during construction to reduce source noise levels.
N-3. All project construction equipment shall be properly maintained to assure that no
additional noise, due to worn or improperly maintained parts is generated during
construction.
UTL-1.Pursuant to the City-approved Landslide Moratorium Exception Permit (ZON2OI 6-00170)
issued on August 29, 2016, prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit for the
project the sewer lateral that serves the applicant's property shall be inspected by the
Public Works Department to verify that there are no cracks, breaks or leaks. If such
deficiencies are present, the sewer lateral shall be repaired or reconstructed to eliminate
them prior to any grading or building permit issuance.
Section 4: For the foregoing reasons and based on the information and findings
included in the Initial Study, Staff Report, Minutes and other records of proceedings, the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes hereby adopts P.C. Resolution No.
2017- 08, thereby determining that the project as conditioned and mitigated will not have a
significant adverse impact on the environment and also finds that the preparation of the
Mitigated Negative Declaration attached hereto complies with CEQA. Therefore, the Planning
Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration, which is attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" and Mitigation Monitoring Program, which is attached hereto as Exhibit `B' and
incorporated herein by this reference, making certain environmental findings to allow the
construction of a 1,917ft2 manufactured single-family residence, a 600ft2 detached garage, a
water storage tank, and 50yd3 of grading to accommodate the improvements at 48 Cinnamon
Lane.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of February 2017, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Bradley, Nelson, Vice Chairman,Cruikshank, Chairman Tomblin
NOES: None
ABSTENTIONS: None
RECUSALS: Commissioners Emenhiser, Leon
ABSENT: Commissioner James
. - . in.
Chairman
Ara Y i ra
Community Development Director and
Secretary of the Planning Commission
P.C. Resolution No. 2017-08
Page 7 of 7
21!City of Rancho Palos Verdes
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ''
1. Project title:
Site Plan Review and Grading Permit(Case No. ZON2016-00401)
2. Lead agency name/address:
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Community Development Department
30940 Hawthorne Boulevard
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
3. Contact person and phone number:
So Kim, Senior Planner
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
(310) 544-5222
4. Project location:
48 Cinnamon Lane (Tract No. 14195, Lot 12, Blk 3)
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
County of Los Angeles
5. Project sponsor's name and address:
Andrea Joannou
14 Limetree Lane
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
6. General Plan designation:
Residential, 1-2 du/acre
7. Coastal Plan designation:
Not applicable
8.Zoning:
Single-Family Residential, 2 du/acre
9. Description of project:
Pursuant to Rancho Palos Verdes Code Section 15.20.020, there is a moratorium on the
filing, processing, approval or issuance of building, grading, or other permits in the area of
the City identified as the "Landslide Moratorium Area", which this subject lot is part of.
However,in 2014,the City and the property owner entered into a settlement agreement as a
result of lawsuit filings which among other things,gave the property owner the ability under
the exception category of the Landslide Moratorium ordinance (RPVMC 15.20.040.B) to
construct a replacement structure on the subject lot. As a result, the subject lot may be
permitted for residential development. The proposed project involves the construction of
one 1,917ft2 single-family residence plus a 600ft2 detached garage (total structure size of
2,617ft2), and a water storage tank on a vacant lot located at 48 Cinnamon Lane.
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
10. Description of project site (as it currently exists):
The project site is a triangular shaped vacant lot that measures 33,541 ft2 in size. located at
the end of a private street — Cinnamon Lane. The subject lot gently slopes in a south
easterly direction with an extreme slope along the rear (i.e. northeast) property line that
descends to a canyon area. The subject site is located within the gated Portuguese Bend
residential community, within Zone 2 of the City's Landslide Moratorium Area. There are
only two access points to this neighborhood, which are both off Palos Verdes Drive South
(Narcissa Gate and the Peppertree Gate).
11. Surrounding land uses and setting:
Land Uses Significant Features
On-site Vacant See site description above.
The abutting lot to the northeast is a
vacant residential lot. which is
surrounded by other vacant and
developed lots, as well as the Filiorum
Vacant residential lot in the Reserve which is a sub-area of the larger
Northeast Portuguese Bend community and City- Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. The
owned Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. Filiorum Reserve was acquired by the
City in 2009 and contains a variety of
natural vegetation. An ephemeral stream
within Altamira Canyon, occurs along the
eastern lot boundary of the subject lot.
The abutting lot to the northwest is a
Develo ed and vacant residential lots residential lot that obtained entitlements
p from the Planning Department but has yet
Northwest in the Portuguese Bend community to be constructed. The properties
and the City-owned Palos Verdes
beyond said lot is vacant, and the
Nature Preserve. y
Filiorum Reserve which is a sub-area of
the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve.
The abutting lot to the south is a vacant
South Developed and undeveloped residen- residential lot which is surrounded by
tial lots in the Portuguese Bend mostly developed residential lots,
community downslope from the subject property,
along Cinnamon Lane.
12. Other public agencies whose approval is required:
None.
Page 2
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
Figure 1
Site Plan for 48 Cinnamon Lane (Tract No. 14195, Lot 12, BIk 3)
•.-..."= .• ■; u1:::: !I'M1 ` ...' . ,/ to
,. /
� tri 'r � 44 ly — ��:7
'CI
�Ys+ rt.rr.tT �Isra$-tl,�.•'� `.s}i�S i k `�v�:`ya`.
\.\\\ \\/ \,
-wt`'{,.• 1-tr�t J 1.)1�1 �ys ;' ' ti'i. �l t,
'' ,'•�:.•�,: .1 } 44 1.1::''•x:14 ; ;•'c. '. ' ��CCti� Lt 9u
r� s`4'.b } €.�i.�•Ef':.�t .� �,��?•1,�,.�:Y���:3S,''�'�l �a1. '^� "ti;5"� •�' �
,)t',. + l//lJ}''1.,�- .�:;'Y .Sr�S�`(ter <lNS y''�..t'+'s� �„r .‹
•!•r'fr r: '•.>^1 11 •�2:•. �. � (' :). •�^ ��.K�f:�.•j•'rl�ti�-.,v,r�
-�ri•f..•-.•i. f •,.. t•:., '''.•'• :a5+<. ,x•1.1:,\',..'•'--,,,.
.r,-< ,.r:1.1•..',i :; '� �'t•'��•::c` < +r+�•'.=.�:`.� _:�•.'
•l...f.rr.,.l:•S:l�•.1",'.'�,'.•:j}��'�,<,:...'...,,
.'j�j.•�• .f..'.�,,N/••..\.K.•t Jew�>.,'J:•• f \ •1
//// \ \ ,\\\\\\ \\\\,,,
\ -‘1..\:--- \\
/
'/ f/ \` TOP OF 5,0PE �•
! \ as ••
_./ /
LUT 13 `1�,•/ / ! „s.�—�
".'....'"---:
/ , J _�� ter``+ 1:\N'
� ::„..,
/ ZOPK IiiEOlke.0 roC'i�Y':dFti'� '/ , caRO' '�'E ,+�*o+ , \
WOOD FENCE
.0.45 / , '1 '-z. M' 1 r# ;\\t\\,
,,,_;\
-' ..- 4111111110-_doilit,, .t.,;„vs'..-:,....- -:---,,-_. ,- „. , \ X e.\, ,
-111 -0/101
,/ ,s/ ....=:— ‘ li-\\
{ •, 5� `'_,,,",c ,,A TRACT# 14195 �\
^/'♦ �`. ' '•ti•'•.v;�•'�rl ._a,=z`;4%,,,,,<,,,,.0,,,-
4,/
%,, \Y ti4 r^ BLK LOT 12
, 24 TREE
...,,,,,i,r x.+,l�„} J,,-,cp''�05 4,7 • ,e_ �,r, \t +1
. . ---. g,----'-------- `,. op.i.*: ,, itii
--s.
1-----:::::: ------ ------ L-<:-:- 1 ._ \ 4 Er*tE I N
O/ —. -- -..
---o'')
''~=y �
'27A E0'F7,7 s'....:-..---.------ —as
7�^ 6,,,45 T '---..„.„..j
LOT 11 -----_.ti -
Page 3
Environmental Checklist
Case No.ZON2016-00401
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
Aesthetics [ 1 Agricultural Resources Air Quality
[ Biological Resources I � Cultural Resources 1 Geology/Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards&Hazardous Materials [ ] Hydrology/Water Quality
Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise
Population/Housing [ Public Services Recreation
Transportation/Traffic I
_ Utilities/Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
X I find that,although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a
significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project
proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,and an ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a"potentially significant impact"or"potentially significant unless
mitigated"impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards,and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based
on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required
but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
[ j I find that, although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects, (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards,and(b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that
earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION,including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed on the
proposed project, nothing further is required.
Signature: Date: Februa 2,2017
Printed Name: So Kim, Senior Planner For: City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Page 4
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
Less Than
Significant
Potentially with Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No
Sources Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
I. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial effect on a scenic 1 X
vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock 8 X
outcroppings, and historical buildings,
within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual
character or quality of the site and its 11. 10 X
surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light
or glare, which would adversely affect 11. 10 X
day or nighttime views in the area'?
Comments:
a) The subject site does not fall within any scenic vista identified in the City's General Plan. Therefore.there would be
no impact caused by the proposed project.
b) The approval of the proposed project will result in the future development of one lot. As the lot is undeveloped.there
are no historical buildings or other structures that could be damaged as a result of the construction of the proposed
project, although it is possible that some mature shrubs and trees might be removed as a result of future development.
Such vegetation is not protected. As such,damage to any scenic resources as a result of the proposed project will be
less than significant.
c) Approval of the proposed project will result in the development of one single-family residence on a residentially
zoned lot that is located on a private street (Cinnamon Lane) with predominantly developed lots with single-family
homes. As part of the City's entitlement process, the proposed project is subject to the neighborhood compatibility
analysis under the provisions of Section 17.02.030.B (Neighborhood Compatibility) of the Rancho Palos Verdes
Municipal Code which will require the proposed residence to be compatible with the visual character of the surrounding
neighborhood. Therefore, as mitigated by the Neighborhood Compatibility process,there would be no impact caused by
the proposed project.
d) The proposed new residence on the subject lot will have exterior lighting that may have impacts to nighttime views in
the area. The materials and windows for the proposed residence will not adversely impact daytime views However.with
the incorporation of the following mitigation measure,the proposed project would result in less than a significant impact
to nighttime views:
AES-1: The exterior lighting for the proposed residences shall be subject to the provisions of Section 17.56.030
(Outdoor Lighting for Residential Uses)of the Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code. Prior to the issuance
of building permits, all residential lighting shall be fully shielded,and no outdoor lighting shall be permitted
where the light source is directed toward or results in direct illumination of a parcel of property or properties
other than that upon which such light source is physically located.
Page 5
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
Less Than
Significant
Potentially with Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No
Sources Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
II.AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland. Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on
the maps prepared pursuant to the 8 X
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resource
Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act 8 X
contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or
cause rezoning of, forest land. X
timberland, or timberland zoned
Timberland Production?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non-forest X
use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which,due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of 8 X
Farmland, to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest
use?
Comments:
a-e)The subject site has an existing land use of single-family residential and is not zoned for agriculture or forestry use.
Additionally,the subject site does not include any farmland,forest land,or timberland and therefore not in conflict with
the Williamson Act. Therefore, there would be no impact caused by the proposed project.
III. AIR QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation 3 X
of the applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or
contribute substantially to an existing or 3 X
projected air quality violation'?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable
net increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal 3 X
or state ambient air quality standard
(including releasing emissions that
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to 3 X
substantial pollutant concentrations?
Page 6
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
Less Than
Significant
Potentially with Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No
Sources Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a 2, 11 X
substantial number of people?
Comments:
a-d) The subject lot is located within the South Coast Air Basin. which is an area of non-attainment for Federal air
quality standards for ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), and suspended particulate matter (PM10 and PM2 5). The
proposed project would limit the amount of non-remedial grading for the development to less than fifty cubic yards(50
CY)total. The movement of soil and the operation of construction equipment may have the potential to create short-
term construction-related air quality impacts upon nearby sensitive receptors,such as single-family residences. Based
upon the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)guidelines for estimating air quality impacts from
construction activities,the development of individual 1-acre parcels would not exceed Localized Significance Thresholds
(LSTs)for nitrous oxides (NOx), CO, PM10 or PM2 5. With the incorporation of the following mitigation measures. the
proposed project would cause less than significant impacts:
AQ-1: During construction, including grading, excavating, and land clearing. storage piles and unpaved disturbed
areas shall be continuously stabilized by being kept wet,treated with a chemical dust suppressant. or covered
when material is not being added to or removed from the pile.
AQ-2: During construction, including grading,excavating, and land clearing,sufficient water shall be applied to areas
disturbed to prevent emitting dust and to minimize visible emissions from crossing the boundary line.
AQ-3: During construction, including grading, excavating, and land clearing, construction vehicles leaving the site
shall be cleaned to prevent dust, silt, mud, and dirt from being released or tracked off site.
AQ-4: During construction, including grading, excavating, and land clearing, the applicant's contractor shall be
responsible for minimizing bulk material or other debris from being tracked onto the City's public roadways.and
if tracked,the applicant's contractor shall be responsible for cleaning up the impacted City's public roadways.
AQ-5: During construction, including grading, excavating, and land clearing, no trucks shall be allowed to transport
excavated material off-site unless the trucks are maintained such that no spillage can occur from holes or other
openings in cargo compartments, and loads are either: covered with tarps: wetted and loaded such that the
material does not touch the front, back, or sides of the cargo compartment at any point less than 6"from the
top and that no point of the load extends above the top of the cargo compartment
AQ-6: Prior to the issuance of any Grading or Building Permits, the applicant shall demonstrate to the Community
Development Director's satisfaction that dust generated by grading activities shall comply with the South
Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 and the City Municipal Code requirements that require
regular watering for the control of dust.
AQ-7: During construction, including grading, excavating, and land clearing, all excavating and grading activities
shall cease when winds gusts(as instantaneous gusts)exceed 25 mph. To assure compliance with this
measure, grading activities are subject to periodic inspections by City staff.
AQ-8: During construction, including grading, excavating, and land clearing. construction equipment shall be kept
in proper operating condition, including proper engine tuning and exhaust control systems.
e) The zoning of the subject lot does not permit industrial or commercial uses. Therefore. no objectionable odors are
expected to be generated as a result of the proposed project.
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect,either 6. 16 X
directly or through habitat modifications,
Page 7
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
Less Than
Significant
Potentially with Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No
Sources Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and
Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on
any riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, 6, 16 X
or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on
federally protected wetlands,as defined
by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act 6 16
(including, but not limited to, marsh, X
vernal pool,coastal,etc.),through direct
removal,filling,hydrological interruption.
or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the 6, 16
movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with X
established native resident or migratory
wildlife corridors. or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local polices or 6. 16
ordinances protecting biological X
resources. such as tree preservation
policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an 6, 16
adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Community Conservation Plan, X
or other approved local. regional, or
state habitat conservation plan?
Comments:
a, b, e, f)The subject lot consist of 0.4 acre of grassland and 0.36 acres of woodland communities. The Altamira
Canyon drainage, an ephemeral stream, occurs along the eastern lot boundary. The grassland community is
composed primarily of non-native species and none were observed within the footprint of the proposed project or on
the stream bed or banks. Nevertheless, the proposed project will result in 0.12 acres of permanent and 0.04
temporary impacts to grassland and exotic woodland communities. Compensation for impacts to these non-native
communities would follow guidelines in the NCCP Subarea Plan, as presented in mitigation measure BIO-1 below.
BIO-1 Prior to any grading or permit issuance,vegetation needed to be cleared for fuel modification shall be offset by
the property owner using a 2:1 ratio for CSS. a 0.5:1 ratio for non-native grassland. and a 3:1 ratio for native
grassland as described in the Council-adopted NCCP for loss occurring in an area greater than 0.3 acres by
using one of the following two methods: 1)With the approval of the City, PVPLC. and the Wildlife Agencies.
the property owner shall dedicate additional acreage to the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve that will add to the
biological function of the Preserve and the property owner shall provide management funding for the additional
Page 8
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
Less Than
Significant
Potentially with Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No
Sources Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
acreage according to a Property Analysis Record or similar method); or 2) Payment of a mitigation fee to the
City's Habitat Restoration Fund, pursuant to the City's NCCP Subarea Plan. If the revegetation option is
selected, the Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy(PVPLC)shall be hired by the City, at the property
owner's expense, to grow and plant the required vegetation.
According to Biological Study prepared by AECOM, no special-status plant or wildlife species have been previously
recorded within the subject site and none were recently observed based on a site visit conducted in October 2015.
Additionally, the subject site does not contain Primary Constituent Elements(PCE), in other words habitat. for the
coastal California gnatcatcher. Suitable coastal sage scrub habitats that provide PCE for coastal California
gnatcatcher are present in nearby the PVNP reserves, including Filiorum and Portuguese Bend Reserves. where
undisturbed habitat provides for the survival and reproduction of the species. Implementation of the proposed
project is not anticipated to impact PCE required by the species. Critical habitat for Palos Verdes blue butterfly
occurs in two areas, the closest located two miles northwest of the subject site and is would not be impacted by the
proposed project. Nevertheless, indirect impacts during construction related to dust. stormwater runoff. and
through the potential spread of noxious and invasive plant species into Altamira Canyon could occur and such
impacts would be considered significant. However, by implementing and adhering to avoidance and minimization
measures provided in Mitigation Measures BIO-2 through BIO-11 below, along with mitigation measured
recommended under the Air Quality and Hydrology Sections of this Initial Study, indirect impacts to the surrounding
sensitive natural community would be less than significant.
BIO-2 Prior to commencing construction, the construction area shall be clearly delineated with fencing or other
boundary markers. Temporary fencing(with silt barriers)shall be installed at the limits of Project impacts to
prevent habitat impacts and prevent the spread of silt from the construction zone into adjacent habitats(i.e.
Altamira Canyon). Fencing shall be installed in a manner that does not affect adjacent habitats to be avoided
and in compliance with Section 17.56.020.0 of the RPVMC.
BIO-3 Prior to commencing construction,a pre-grading meeting shall occur to inform the construction contractor of
the biological/jurisdictional constraints (Altamira Canyon)of this Project. The Project limits shall be clearly
marked on Project maps provided to the construction contractor and areas outside of the Project limits shall
be designated as "no construction"zones.
BIO-4 During construction. construction workers shall strictly limit their activities. vehicles. equipment. and
construction materials to the designated construction limits.
BIO-5 During construction, all equipment maintenance, staging, and dispensing of fuel, oil. coolant. or any other
such activities shall occur in designated areas within the fenced Project limits.These designated areas shall
be located in previously compacted and disturbed areas, in such a manner to prevent runoff into adjacent
areas and shall be shown on the construction plans. Fueling of equipment shall take place on level surfaces
and contractor equipment shall be checked daily for leaks prior to operation and repaired as necessary.
BIO-6 During construction, the construction work zone shall be kept as clean of debris as possible to avoid attracting
predators of native and sensitive wildlife. All food-related trash items shall be enclosed in sealed containers
and removed daily from the construction work zone.
BIO-7 In order to avoid unnecessary impacts, should any non-listed species be found within the property.they shall
be avoided and allowed to leave the Project site on their own volition, or a qualified biologist shall relocate
them outside of the Project site.
BIO-8 Pets of Project personnel shall not be allowed on the Project site during construction.
BIO-9 Prior to any grading or building permit issuance, a qualified biologist shall review the landscape plans to
ensure that that no invasive,non-native plant species are used in any proposed landscaping.The Landscape
Page 9
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
Less Than
Significant
Potentially with Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No
Sources Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
Plan shall include a plant palette that consists of native plants and non-invasive species.
BIO-10 Prior to commencing construction, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared to
reduce the potential for accidental releases of fuel, pesticides, and other materials. This plan shall outline
refueling locations. emergency response procedures. and reporting requirements. During construction.
equipment for immediate cleanup shall be kept at the staging area.This plan shall also include erosion control
measures to control surface runoff, erosion, and sedimentation outside of the project footprints.
BIO-11 A qualified biologist shall monitor construction during clearing, grubbing, and initial excavation activities. as
needed. The biological monitor shall ensure that, if present, nesting birds in the Project vicinity are not
impacted(change in normal behaviors)and that construction workers stay within the designated footprint of
the construction work zone, as delineated by fencing, to avoid trespass on foot or in vehicles into sensitive
habitats. such as Altamira Canyon along the eastern perimeter of the Project site.
Little wildlife was observed on site and no nest were observed in on-site trees. Nevertheless, indirect impacts to nesting
birds within the vicinity of the Project site could occur during construction as a result of noise, dust. increased human
presence. and vibrations resulting from construction activities. Disturbances related to construction could result in
increased nestling mortality due to nest abandonment or decreased feeding frequency. Therefore, indirect impacts
would be considered significant. By adhering to avoidance and minimization measure BIO-12 below.indirect impacts to
nesting birds would be reduced to less than significant.
BIO-12 The clearance of vegetation during construction shall occur outside of the nesting season (generally
February 1 through September 1). If avoiding the nesting season is not practicable. the following additional
measures shall be employed:
•A pre-construction nesting survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within 3 days prior to the start of
construction activities to determine whether active nests are present within or directly adjacent to the
construction zone. All nests found shall be recorded.
• If construction activities must occur within 300 feet of an active nest of any passerine bird or within 500 feet of
an active nest of any raptor,with the exception of an emergency,a qualified biologist shall monitor the nest on
a weekly basis,and the construction activity shall be postponed until the biologist determines that the nest is no
longer active.
• If the recommended nest avoidance zone is not feasible.the qualified biologist shall determine whether an
exception is possible and obtain concurrence from the resource agencies before construction work can resume
within the avoidance buffer zone. All work shall cease within the avoidance buffer zone until either agency
concurrence is obtained or the biologist determines that the adults and young are no longer reliant on the nest
site.
c) Altamira Canyon is an ephemeral stream that occurs along the eastern perimeter of the subject site and receives
protection under the Clean Water Act and California Fish and Game Code.The limits of ground disturbance as a result
of the proposed project will be approximately 25 feet away from the top of the stream bank. As a result. permits from
regulatory agencies for impacts to waters pursuant to CWA Section 404, and waters of the State pursuant to CFGC
Sections 1600-1670 are not required.
d) The subject site represents a small area and is primarily composed of non-native species that are generally
unsuitable to support wildlife movement.Altamira Canyon,along the eastern perimeter of the Project site. may support
local wildlife movement.Activities proposed under the Project would not remove vegetation along Altamira Canyon.thus
direct impacts to a movement corridor for local wildlife are not anticipated. However.temporary construction activities
(i.e., increased dust and noise)would likely result in wildlife species generally avoiding the immediate vicinity of the
project site. However, indirect effects of construction on wildlife movement along Altamira Canyon would be temporary
Page 10
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
Less Than
Significant
Potentially with Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No
Sources Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
in nature. restricted to the project construction time period. Furthermore, implementation of Mitigation Measures BI0-2
through BI0-12 above would ensure impacts to a wildlife movement corridor are less than significant.
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a historical resource 8 X
as defined in §15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of an archaeological 5 X
resource pursuant to§15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or 5 X
unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including
those interred outside of formal 5 X
cemeteries'?
Comments:
a) The subject lot has remained undeveloped since its creation in the late 1940s. As a result.the proposed residential
development would have no impact upon any historical resources.
b-d)According to the City's Archaeology Map, the subject site is within a possible area of archaeological resources.
The approval of the proposed project would only permit 50yd3 of grading, which limits the depth of grading to surface
excavations for the footings of the structure. Nevertheless, it is possible that subsurface cultural resources may exist on
the subject lot. However,with the incorporation of the following mitigation measures.the proposed project would cause
less than significant impacts to cultural resources:
CUL-1 Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit, the applicant shall consult with the South Central
Coastal Information Center(SCCIC)regarding any known archaeological sites on or within a half-mile radius of
the subject property.
CUL-2 Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit, the applicant shall conduct a Phase 1 archaeological
survey of the property for approval by the Community Development Director.
CUL-3 Prior to the commencement of grading,the applicant shall retain a qualified paleontologist and archeologist to
monitor grading and excavation. In the event undetected buried cultural resources are encountered during
grading and excavation. work shall be halted or diverted from the resource area and the archeologist and/or
paleontologist shall evaluate the remains and propose appropriate mitigation measures.
VI. GEOLOGY/SOILS. Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including
the risk of loss. injury, or death
involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault,
as delineated on the most recent
Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State X
Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known
fault?
Page 11
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
Less Than
Significant
Potentially with Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No
Sources Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? 17 X
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, in- 17 X
cluding liquefaction'?
iv) Landslides? 17 X
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the X
loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geological unit or soil
that is unstable, or that would become
unstable as a result of the project, and 17 X
potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading.subsidence,.
liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil,as defined
in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building 17 X
Code (1994), thus creating substantial
risks to life or property'?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal X
systems where sewers are not available
for the disposal of wastewater'?
Comments:
a, c-d) Pursuant to Rancho Palos Verdes Code Section 15.20.020, there is a moratorium on the filing. processing.
approval or issuance of building,grading,or other permits in the area of the City identified as the"Landslide Moratorium
Area", which this subject lot is part of. However, in 2014, the City and the property owner entered into a settlement
agreement as a result of lawsuit filings which among other things, gave the property owner the ability under the
exception category of the Landslide Moratorium ordinance(RPVMC 15.20.040.B)to construct a replacement structure
on the subject lot. As a result,a Landslide Moratorium Exception Permit(ZON2016-00170)was issued by the City on
August 29. 2016 that allows the processing of formal applications for the proposed residential development.
Additionally, on November 4. 2016, the City Geologist reviewed the proposed project and granted an in-concept
approval for planning purposes, provided that additional input is submitted during the Building & Safety plan check
process. According to the Official Maps of Seismic Hazard Zones provided by the State of California Department of
Conservation,the subject lot is located within an area that is potentially subject to earthquake-induced landslides. The
subject site is located within the vicinity of the Palos Verdes fault zone, although there is no evidence of active faulting
as a result. The soils of the Palos Verdes Peninsula are also generally known to be expansive and occasionally
unstable. Given the known and presumed soils conditions in and around the subject site, it is expected that soil
investigations, reviewed and conceptually approved by the City's geotechnical consultant, will be required prior to
construction. With the incorporation of the following mitigation measures.the proposed project would cause less than
significant impacts:
GEO-1 Prior to issuance of any building or grading permit,the applicant shall submit the additional information required
by the City Geologist, including a soils report,and/or a geotechnical report,for the review and approval of the
City Geologist. The applicant shall comply with any requirements imposed by the City Geologist and shall
substantially repair the geologic conditions to the satisfaction of the City Geologist.
GEO-2 Prior to issuance of any building or grading permit, a Hold Harmless Agreement, satisfactory to the City
Attorney promising to defend. indemnify,and hold the City harmless from any claims or damages resulting from
the requested project,shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for recordation with the Los
Angeles County Recorders Office.
Page 12
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
Less Than
Significant
Potentially with Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No
Sources Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
GEO-3 Prior to issuance of any building or grading permit, the applicant shall submit for recordation a covenant.
satisfactory to the City Attorney. agreeing to construct the project strictly in accordance with the approved
plans: and agreeing to prohibit further projects on the subject site without first filing an application with the
Director. Such covenant shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for recordation with the
Los Angeles County Recorders Office.
b) During grading and construction operations for any new residences, top soil will be exposed and removed from
individual properties. It is the City's standard practice to require the preparation and implementation of an erosion
control plan for wind-and waterborne soil for construction projects. With the incorporation of the following mitigation
measures. the proposed project would cause less than significant impacts:
GEO-4 Prior to issuance of any grading or building permit, the applicant shall prepare an erosion control plan for the
review and approval of the Building Official. The applicant shall be responsible for continuous and effective
implementation of the erosion control plan during project construction.
e) The City has constructed a sanitary sewer system that serves the subject lot along with other lots within the
Portuguese Bend Community. The purpose of constructing this system was to reduce the amount of groundwater within
the Landslide Moratorium Area by eliminating the use of private septic systems, with the ultimate goal or slowing or
stopping land movement. New residences in areas with sanitary sewer connections,such as the proposed project.are
required to connect to the existing sanitary sewer system. As a result, any geology/soils impacts related to septic
systems will be less than significant.
VII.GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions,
either directly or indirectly, that may X
have a significant impact on the
environment?
b) Conflict with any applicable plan, policy
or regulation adopted for the purpose of X
reducing the emissions of greenhouse
gases?
Comments:
a) The average California household generates thirty-eight (38) tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions annually.
based upon data obtained from CoolCalifornia.org. Currently,there are no generally-accepted significance thresholds
for assessing greenhouse gas(GHG)emissions. However,the development of the proposed residence would include
features that tend to offset the carbon footprint of their development. For example,the use of water would continue to
be carefully controlled within the Landslide Moratorium Area in the interest of minimizing the infiltration of groundwater
as a means to enhance soil stability. Reducing the use of water reduces energy use related to the transport of water.
The development of the subject lot would tend to counteract the negative effects of sprawl by"in-filling"an established
residential neighborhood rather than converting raw land to urban use. For all of these reasons.the GHG emissions
associated with the proposed project would be less than significant.
b) California's major initiatives for reducing climate change or greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are outlined in
Assembly Bill 32(signed into law in 2006),a 2005 Executive Order and a 2004 Air Resources Board(ARB)regulation to
reduce passenger-car GHG emissions. These efforts aim at reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 (a
reduction of approximately 30 percent)and then an 80-percent reduction below 1990 levels by 2050. Currently.there
are no adopted plans, policies or regulations for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions for the development of new.
single-family residences. Additionally, the proposed manufactured residential building will be State certified. which
incorporates required Green building and energy standards. For this reason, the GHG emissions associated with the
proposed project would be less than significant.
Page 13
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
Less Than
Significant
Potentially with Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No
Sources Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
VIII. HAZARDS &HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment through the routine X
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials'
b) Create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident X
conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environ-
ment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within 8 X
one-quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included
on a list of hazardous materials sites
complied pursuant to Government Code
12 X
Section 65962.5 and, as a result,would
it create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport
land use plan or.where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport. 8 X
would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a
private airstrip, would the project result 8 X
in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
13 X
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a
significant risk of loss, injury, or death
involving wildland fires, including where 9 X
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized
areas or where residences are
intermixed with wildlands?
Comments:
a-b) No hazardous materials or conditions are known or expected to exist on the subject property. The proposed
residential development of a manufactured home and a detached garage will utilize conventional construction methods
and materials that would not involve the use or transport of hazardous materials. Therefore.there would be less than
significant impact caused by the proposed project.
Page 14
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
Less Than
Significant
Potentially with Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No
Sources Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
c) The nearest school in the vicinity of the subject property is the Portuguese Bend Nursery School at Abalone Cove
Shoreline Park. At its closest point, the subject property is over half a mile away from the nursery school. Therefore.
there would be no impact caused by the proposed project.
d) The subject lot is not included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5. Therefore. there would be no impact caused by the proposed project.
e-f) The subject lot is not located within two (2) miles of Torrance Municipal Airport or in the vicinity of any private
airstrip. Therefore, there would be no impact caused by the proposed project.
g) In 2014,the cities of Rancho Palos Verdes and Rolling Hills Estates adopted a Joint Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan
(JNHMP). The purpose of the JNHMP is"to promote sound public policy designed to protect citizens. critical facilities.
infrastructure,private property,and the environment from natural hazards." The approval of the proposed project is not
incompatible with the purpose of the JNHMP. Therefore, there would be less than significant impact caused by the
proposed project.
h) Based upon the most recent maps prepared by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection(CalFire).
the entire Palos Verdes Peninsula is within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The subject lot is located at the end
of a private street that abuts developed and undeveloped private properties. With the incorporation of the following
mitigation measure, the proposed project would cause less than significant impacts:
HAZ-1: Prior to issuance of a building permit,the new single-family residences and related accessory structures shall
be designed to incorporate all applicable fire protection requirements of the City's most recently adopted
Building Code. to the satisfaction of the Building Official.
IX. HYDROLOGY/WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or X
wastewater discharge requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume
or a lowering of the local groundwater X
(e.g., the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level which
would not support existing land uses or
planned uses for which permits have
been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including
through the alteration of the course of a X
stream or river, in a manner which
would result in substantial erosion or
siltation on-or off-site'?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area including
through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase X
the rate or amount of surface runoff in a
manner that would result in flooding on-
or off-site'?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or X
planned stormwater drainage systems
or provide substantial additional sources
Page 15
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
Less Than
Significant
Potentially with Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No
Sources Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water X
quality?
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood
hazard area, as mapped on a federal
Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood 8 X
Insurance Rate map or other flood
hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard
area structures which would impede or 8 X
redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a
significant risk of loss, injury, or death 8 X
involving flooding, including flooding as
a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or 8 X
mudflow?
Comments:
a, c-f) The proposed project may result in changes to the current drainage patterns of the area as a result of increased
impervious areas, as well as the potential for erosion and run-off during construction. With the incorporation of the
following mitigation measures. the proposed project would cause less than significant impacts:
HYD-1 Prior to the issuance of a grading and/or building permit,the applicant shall submit for review and approval by
the City's Building Official an Erosion Control Plan that shall include BMPs for erosion.sedimentation and run-
off control during construction activities to protect the water quality. Additionally,the Erosion Control Plan shall
include post-construction BMPs that apply to runoff from the future buildings. including roof run-off.
HYD-2 Prior to the issuance of a grading and/or building permit for new construction, the applicant shall submit and
obtain approval of a Drainage Plan by the City's Building&Safety Division and the City's Public Works Director
finding that stormwater runoff as a result from the development of the subject site is designed to flow and utilize
an on-site drainage system that directs runoff from all buildings and structures on the site shall be contained
and directed to the streets or an approved drainage course. If lot drainage deficiencies are identified by the
Public Works Director, all such deficiencies shall be corrected by the applicant.
HYD-3 All landscaping irrigation systems shall be part of a water management system approved by the Public Works
Director. Irrigation for landscaping shall be permitted only as necessary to maintain the yard and garden
b) The proposed project will not involve or require the withdrawal of groundwater because water service to these
properties will be provided by the California Water Service Company. Therefore. there would be less than significant
impact caused by the proposed project.
g-h) There are no Federally-mapped 100-year flood hazard areas in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.Therefore.there
would be less than significant impact caused by the proposed project.
i) There is no dam or levee anywhere in the vicinity of the subject lot. Therefore,there would be less than significant
impact caused by the proposed project.
j) The subject lot does not adjoin an ocean, lake or other body of water, so there is no risk of inundation by seiche.
tsunami or mudflow. Furthermore,the lowest elevation of the subject property is roughly 430 feet above mean sea level
(MSL). Therefore. there would be less than significant impact caused by the proposed project.
X. LAND USE/PLANNING. Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established com- 8, 2 X
Page 16
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
Less Than
Significant
Potentially with Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No
Sources Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
munity?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use
plan, policy, or regulation of an agency
with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general 1 2 X
plan. specific plan,local coastal plan,or
zoning ordinance) adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect'?
c) Conflict with any applicable Habitat
Conservation Plan or Natural Com- 6 X
munity Conservation Plan'?
Comments:
a) Pursuant to Rancho Palos Verdes Code Section 15.20.020,there is a moratorium on the filing,processing.approval
or issuance of building, grading, or other permits in the area of the City identified as the"Landslide Moratorium Areae.
which this subject lot is part of. However, in 2014,the City and the property owner entered into a settlement agreement
as a result of lawsuit filings which among other things,gave the property owner the ability under the exception category
of the Landslide Moratorium ordinance(RPVMC 15.20.040.B)to construct a replacement structure on the subject lot.
As a result,the subject lot may be permitted for residential development and a Landslide Moratorium Exception Permit
(ZON2016-00170)was issued by the City on August 29,2016 that allows the processing of formal applications for the
proposed residential development. Since the subject site is a vacant lot located at the end of a private street within an
established tract with existing homes, the proposed residential development would not divide the Portuguese Bend
community: rather, it would constitute"in-fill"development within the community. Therefore.there would be no impact
caused by the proposed project.
b) The underlying General Plan land use and zoning designations for the subject lot are Residential 1-2 du/ac and
Single-Family Residential 2 du/ac, respectively. Both land use and zoning designations allow single-family residences
as the primary permitted use for the subject lot. Additionally, the subject lot is not located within the coastal zone.
Therefore, there would be no impact caused by the proposed project.
c) See Section IV, Biological Resources section above.
XI. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a
known mineral resource that would be of 1 X
value to the region and the residents of
the state?
•
b) Result in the loss of availability of a
locally-important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local 1 X
general plan,specific plan. or other land
use plan'?
Comments:
a-b) There are no mineral resources known or expected to exist on the subject lot. Additionally, the approval of the
proposed project only permits shallow surface excavations,primarily for footings, as the quantity of grading is limited to
50yd3, balanced on site. Therefore. there would be no impact caused by the proposed project.
XII.NOISE. Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of
noise levels in excess of standards 1 X
established in the local general plan or _
Page 17
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
Less Than
Significant
Potentially with Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No
Sources Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
noise ordinance, or applicable stan-
dards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of
excessive groundborne vibration or X
groundborne noise levels'?
c) A substantial permanent increase in
ambient noise levels in the project X
vicinity above levels existing without the
project'?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic
increase in ambient noise levels in the X
project vicinity above levels existing
without the project'?
e) For a project located within an airport
land use plan or,where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or a public use airport, 8 X
would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels'?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a
private airstrip,would the project expose 8 X
people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
Comments:
a) The City of Rancho Palos Verdes does not have a noise ordinance. However, General Plan Noise Policy No. 5
"[requires]residential uses in the 70 dB(A)location range to provide regulatory screening or some other noise-inhibiting
agent to ensure compliance with the noise ordinance." The Noise Levels Contour diagram in the General Plan does not
depict the subject lot falling with a 70 db(A) noise contour. Therefore, there would be less than significant impact
caused by the proposed project.
b-d) The proposed residential development will result in an increase of ambient noise levels in the area as a result of
one additional household and related vehicle noise. The large lot sizes of the neighboring lots in the near vicinity(i.e..
averaging an acre in size) and the presence of existing mature foliage along the private rights-of-way and private
properties will serve as buffers to the"operational"noise associated with new residences. The operation of construction
equipment have the potential to create short-term construction-related noise and vibration impacts to neighboring
homes. With the incorporation of the following mitigation measure, the proposed project would cause less than
significant impacts:
N-1 Permitted hours and days for construction activity are 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM, Monday through Friday. 9:OOAM to
5:OOPM on Saturday, with no construction activity permitted on Sundays or on the legal holidays specified in
Section 17.96.920 of the Rancho Palos Verdes Development Code. During demolition, construction and/or
grading operations,trucks shall not park,queue and/or idle at the project site or in the adjoining street rights-of-
way before 7AM Monday through Friday and before 9AM on Saturday, in accordance with the permitted hours
of construction stated in this condition. When feasible to do so, the construction contractor shall provide
staging areas on-site to minimize off-site transportation of heavy construction equipment. These areas shall be
located to maximize the distance between staging activities and neighboring properties,subject to approval by
the building official.
N-2: The project shall utilize construction equipment equipped with standard noise insulating features during
Page 18
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
Less Than
Significant
Potentially with Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No
Sources Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
construction to reduce source noise levels.
N-3: All project construction equipment shall be properly maintained to assure that no additional noise. due to
worn or improperly maintained parts is generated during construction.
e-f) The subject lot is not located within two (2) miles of Torrance Municipal Airport or in the vicinity of any private
airstrip. Therefore. there would be no impact caused by the proposed project.
XIII. POPULATION/HOUSING. Would the project:
a) Induce substantial growth in an area
either directly (e.g., by proposing new
homes or businesses)or indirectly(e.g.. 14 X
through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing
housing, necessitating the construction 8 X
of replacement housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of
people, necessitating the construction 8 X
of replacement housing elsewhere'?
Comments:
a) The proposed project involves a residential development of a single vacant lot,which would result in an increase of
one household. Therefore, there would be less than significant impact caused by the proposed project.
b-c) As the proposed project is for residential development on a vacant lot. no existing housing or persons would be
displaced as a result of the proposed project. Therefore. there would be no impacts caused by the proposed project.
XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES.
a) Would the project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated
with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities. need for
new or physically altered governmental
facilities,the construction of which could
cause significant environmental im-
pacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the
following public services:
i) Fire protection'? X
ii) Police protection'? X
iii) Schools'? X
iv) Parks'? X
v) Other public facilities'? X
Comments:
a) The proposed residential development of a single vacant lot will result in an increase of one household in an
established residential neighborhood that is currently served by public safety services. One additional household will
not result in impacts that will necessitate the provision of additional facilities to maintain existing public services.
Additionally. as standard requirements of the construction of new residences.the applicant will be required to pay fees
Page 19
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
Less Than
Significant
Potentially with Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No
Sources Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
to the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District(PVPUSD). Therefore,there would be less than significant impact
caused by the proposed project.
XV. RECREATION.
a) Would the project increase the use of
neighborhood and regional parks or
other recreational facilities such that X
substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated'?
b) Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities, X
which might have an adverse physical
effect on the environment'?
Comments:
a) The proposed residential development of a single vacant lot will result in an increase of one household in an
established residential neighborhood. One additional household will not result in substantial increase in the use of
parks or other recreational facilities that would accelerate physical deterioration. Therefore,there would be less than
significant impact caused by the proposed project.
b) The proposed project does not include the development of recreation facilities and therefore. there would be less
than significant impact caused by the proposed project.
XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project:
a) Conflict with an applicable plan,
ordinance, or policy establishing
measures of effectiveness for the
performance of the circulation system,
taking into account all modes of
transportation including mass transit X
and non-motorized travel and relevant
components of the circulation system,
including but not limited to intersections,
streets. highways and freeways.
pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass
transit?
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion
management program, including, but
not limited to level of service standards
and travel demand measures, or other X
standards established by the county
congestion management agency for
designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns,
including either an increase in traffic X
levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety risks?
•
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a
design feature (e.g. sharp curves or X
dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g. farm
Page 20
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
Less Than
Significant
Potentially with Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No
Sources Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
equipment?
e) Result in inadequate emergency ac- 13 X
cess?
f) Conflicts with adopted policies,plans,or
programs supporting alternative trans- X
portation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle
racks)?
Comments:
a, f) The land use and zoning designation of the subject site is residential development and has access via private
streets from Palos Verdes Drive South. As such, there would be no impacts to the circulation systems in relation to
mass transit to conflict with any adopted policies,plans. or programs supporting alternative transportation. Therefore.
there would be no impact caused by the proposed project.
b)According to the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation (6th edition). the trip generation rate for an
additional future residential project is nominal and not substantial enough to cause adverse impacts to the level of
service standard for designated roads or highways. Since the property can already be developed with a single-family
residence, an additional dwelling unit as a result of the proposed project would cause less than significant impact.
c) The subject property is designated for residential use that will not cause substantial safety risks because the
proposed residence complies with the required setbacks for the RS-2 zoning district. does not impair an intersection
visibility triangle, does not exceed the permitted building envelope of 16720'and is within an established residential
tract surrounded by other residential properties.Therefore, there would be no impact caused by the proposed project.
d-e) The proposed project does not include any modifications to existing private rights-of-way or changes in current
land-use patterns that would create or increase hazardous conditions or hamper emergency access the Portuguese
Bend community. Additionally, the proposed project would need to comply with the adopted Municipal Code and
Uniform Building Code to ensure no adverse impacts. Furthermore, Fire Department review will be required to ensure
adequate emergency access. Therefore. the proposed project would cause less than significant impacts.
XVII. UTILITIES/SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment require-
ments of the applicable Regional Water 15 X
Quality Control Board'?
b) Require or result in the construction of
new water or wastewater treatment
facilities or expansion of existing 15 X
facilities,the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects'?
c) Require or result in the construction of
new storm water drainage facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the 15 X
construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects'?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available
to serve the project from existing X
entitlements and resources, or are new
or expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it 15 X
has adequate capacity to serve the
project's projected demand in addition
Page 21
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
Less Than
Significant
Potentially with Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No
Sources Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
to the provider's existing commitments'?
r
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient
permitted capacity to accommodate the X
project's solid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local
statures and regulations related to solid X
waste'?
Comments:
a-c, e) The City has constructed a sanitary sewer system that serves certain areas of the Portuguese Bend
community, including the properties located along Cinnamon Lane (e.g., the Abalone Cove Sewer System). The
purpose of constructing the Abalone Cove Sewer System was to reduce the amount of groundwater within the Landslide
Moratorium Area by eliminating the use of private septic systems. with the ultimate goal or slowing or stopping land
movement. According to the EIR prepared for the Abalone Cove Sewer System project. this system was originally
intended to serve one hundred ten(110)developed and forty-six(46)undeveloped lots in the Abalone Cove area or the
Portuguese Bend community, which includes the subject lot. Nevertheless, in order to reduce the utilities/service
systems impacts of the proposed project to less-than-significant levels, the following mitigation measures are
recommended:
UTL-1 Pursuant to the City-approved Landslide Moratorium Exception Permit(ZON2016-00170)issued on August 29.
2016 . prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit for the project the sewer lateral that serves the
applicant's property shall be inspected by the Public Works Department to verify that there are no cracks.
breaks or leaks. If such deficiencies are present, the sewer lateral shall be repaired or reconstructed to
eliminate them prior to any grading or building permit issuance.
d) California Water Service Company(Cal Water)provides the City's water service. Given that the proposed project
will increase the number of households by only 1, the increase in water demand is nominal and will result in less than
significant impact.
f-g) The properties in the Portuguese Bend community solid waste disposal services through existing City contracts with
residential waste haulers. However, the approval of the proposed project will not directly grant any entitlement to
develop these lots. Given the limited potential scope of the proposed project, the solid waste disposal impacts are
expected to be less-than-significant.
XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment.
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species. cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels.threaten to eliminate a X
plant or animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory?
Comments:
The proposed project.with mitigation,will not degrade the quality of the environment; substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species. cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels:threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community; or reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. The
proposed project will not eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or pre-history.
Page 22
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
Less Than
Significant
Potentially with Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No
Sources Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively X
considerable?1
Comments:
The proposed project is to allow a manufactured home on a single vacant lot within an established residential
community. While there would be temporary construction related impacts. with the imposition of the recommended
mitigation measures. these potential cumulative impacts will be reduced to less-than-significant levels.
c) Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial X
adverse effects on human beings,either
directly or indirectly?
Comments:
As discussed above, all potentially-significant environmental effects of the proposed project can be mitigated to less-
than-significant levels. Therefore,the proposed project will have no substantial adverse effects on human beings.either
directly or indirectly.
XIV. EARLIER ANALYSES.
Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects
have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration. Section 15063 (c) (3) (D). In this case a
discussion should identify the following items:
a) Earlier analysis used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
Comments:
A Supplemental Environmental Impact Report(SEIR)was prepared for the Abalone Cove Sewer System in 1996. A
supplement to the SEIR was subsequent prepared in 1998. Copies of these documents are available for review at the
Public Works Department of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, 30940 Hawthorne Boulevard. Rancho Palos Verdes.CA
90275. These documents were utilized as source of background data related to the installation of the Abalone Cove
Sewer System.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards. and state whether such effects
were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
Comments:
Not applicable.
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are"Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated."describe
the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they
address site-specific conditions of the project.
Comments:
Not applicable.
Authority: Public Resources Code Sections 21083 and 21087.
Reference: Public Resources Code Sections 21080(c),21080.1,21080.3,21082.1,21083,21083.3.21093. 321094.
21151; Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino, 202 Cal. App. 3d 296(1988); Leonofff v. Monterey Board of Supervisors.
222 Cal. App. 3d 1337 (1990).
20.SOURCE REFERENCES.
1 "Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of the past projects.the effects of other current projects,and the effects of probable future projects.
Page 23
Environmental Checklist
Case No. ZON2016-00401
Less Than
Significant
Potentially with Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No
Sources Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
1 City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Rancho Palos Verdes General Plan, and associated Environmental
Impact Report. Rancho Palos Verdes, California as amended through August 2001.
2 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Zoning Map
3 South Coast Air Quality Management District. CEQA AIR Quality Handbook. Diamond Bar. California.
November 1993(as amended).
4 Official Maps of Seismic Hazard Zones provided by the Department of Conservation of the State of
California. Division of Mines and Geology
5 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Archeology Map.
6 City of Rancho Palos Verdes, Natural Communities Conservation Plan. Rancho Palos Verdes.
California as adopted August 2004
7 Institute of Traffic Engineers, ITE Trip Generation, 7m-Edition.
8 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Geographic Information System (GIS)database and maps
9 State of California. Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone
Maps. Sacramento. California, accessed via website. March 2008
10 Project Plans
11 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code
12 Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List(i.e., "Cortese List")
13 Cities of Rancho Palos Verdes and Rolling Hills Estates Joint Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan
14 City of Rancho Palos Verdes General Plan Housing Element
15 Abalone Cove Sewer System Supplement Environmental Impact Report
16 Popp, Arthur(AECOM). (2016. October 31). Biological Assessment for Tract 14195 Lot 12—48
Cinnamon lane(Case No. ZON2016-00401).
17 Lancaster, Jim (Kling Consulting Group, Inc). (2016, November 4). City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Revised Geotechnical Report Response Checklist.
ATTACHMENTS:
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Page 24
Exhibit “B”
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Project:
Site Plan Review and Grading Permit (ZON2016-00401)
Location:
48 Cinnamon Lane (Tract No. 14195, Lot 12, Blk 3)
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
County of Los Angeles
Applicant/Landowner:
Andrea Joannou
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction ........ …………………………………………………………………………………………………….2
Purpose...…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….......2
Environmental Procedures……………………………………………………………………………………………2
Mitigation Monitoring Program Requirements.......................................................................................... 2
II. Management of the Mitigation Monitoring Program ................................................................................. 3
Roles and Responsibilities ...................................................................................................................... 3
Mitigation and Monitoring Program Procedures ....................................................................................... 3
Mitigation Monitoring Operations ............................................................................................................ 3
III. Mitigation Monitoring Program Checklist ................................................................................................. 5
IV. Mitigation Monitoring Summary Table ..................................................................................................... 6
I. INTRODUCTION
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Exhibit B - Page 1
Resolution No. 2017-08
PURPOSE
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) is to allow the following project at 48 Cinnamon Lane (Tract No. 14195,
Portuguese Bend
Lot 12, Blk 3), located at the end Cinnamon Lane, a private street, within the community in the City
of Rancho Palos Verdes:
Construction of a 1,917ft² single-family residence, a 600ft² detached garage (total structure size of
2,617ft²), and a water storage tank.
The MMP responds to Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code, which requires a lead or responsible agency
that approves or carries out a project where a Mitigated Negative Declaration has identified significant environmental
effects, to adopt a "reporting or monitoring program for adopted or required changes to mitigate or avoid significant
environmental effects." The City of Rancho Palos Verdes is acting as lead agency for the project.
An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared to address the potential environmental impacts of the
project. Where appropriate, this environmental document recommended mitigation measures to mitigate or avoid
impacts identified. Consistent with Section 21080 (2)(c) of the Public Resources Code, a mitigation reporting or
monitoring program is required to ensure that the adopted mitigation measures under the jurisdiction of the City are
implemented. The City will adopt this MMP when adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROCEDURES
This MMP has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), as
amended (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA
(CEQA Guidelines), as amended (California Administrative Code Section 15000 et seq.). This MMP complies with
the rules, regulations, and procedures adopted by the City of Rancho Palos Verdes for implementation of CEQA.
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code states: "When making the findings required by subdivision (a) of
Section 21081 or when adopting a negative declaration pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section
21081, the public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes to the project which it has
adopted or made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment.
The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. For
those changes which have been required or incorporated into the project at the request of an agency having
jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the project, that agency shall, if so requested by the lead or
responsible agency, prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program."
II. MANAGEMENT OF THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Exhibit B - Page 2
Resolution No. 2017-08
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The MMP for the project will be in place through all phases of the project including final design, pre-grading,
construction, and operation. The City will have the primary enforcement role for the mitigation measures.
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM PROCEDURES
The mitigation monitoring procedures for this MMP consists of, filing requirements, and compliance verification. The
Mitigation Monitoring Checklist and procedures for its use are outlined below.
Mitigation Monitoring Program Checklist
The MMP Checklist provides a comprehensive list of the required mitigation measures. In addition, the Mitigation
Monitoring Checklist includes: the implementing action when the mitigation measure will occur; the method of
verification of compliance; the timing of verification; the department or agency responsible for implementing the
mitigation measures; and compliance verification. Section III provides the MMP Checklist.
Mitigation Monitoring Program Files
Files shall be established to document and retain the records of this MMP. The files shall be established, organized,
and retained by the City of Rancho Palos Verdes department of Community Development
Compliance Verification
The MMP Checklist shall be signed when compliance of the mitigation measure is met according to the City of
Rancho Palos Verdes Community Development Director. The compliance verification section of the MMP Checklist
shall be signed, for mitigation measures requiring ongoing monitoring, and when the monitoring of a mitigation
measure is completed.
MITIGATION MONITORING OPERATIONS
The following steps shall be followed for implementation, monitoring, and verification of each mitigation measure:
1. The City of Rancho Palos Verdes, Community Development Director shall designate a party responsible for
monitoring of the mitigation measures.
2. The City of Rancho Palos Verdes, Community Development Director shall provide to the party responsible
for the monitoring of a given mitigation measure, a copy of the MMP Checklist indicating the mitigation
measures for which the person is responsible and other pertinent information.
3. The party responsible for monitoring shall then verify compliance and sign the Compliance Verification
column of the MMP Checklist for the appropriate mitigation measures.
Mitigation measures shall be implemented as specified by the MMP Checklist. During any project phase,
unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The City of
Rancho Palos Verdes, Community Development Director with advice from Staff or another City department, is
responsible for recommending changes to the mitigation measures, if needed. If mitigation measures are refined,
the Community Development Director would document the change and shall notify the appropriate design,
construction, or operations personnel about refined requirements.
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Exhibit B - Page 3
Resolution No. 2017-08
III.MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM CHECKLIST
INTRODUCTION
This section provides the MMP Checklist for the project as approved by the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Palos Verdes on February 28, 2017. Mitigation measures are listed in the order in which they appear in the
Initial Study.
Types
project design, construction, operational, or cumulative.
* of measures are
Time of Implementationwhen
* indicates the measure is to be implemented.
Responsible Entity who
* indicates is responsible for implementation.
Compliance Verification
* provides space for future reference and notation that compliance has been
monitored, verified, and is consistent with these mitigation measures.
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Exhibit B - Page 4
Resolution No. 2017-08
MITIGATION MEASURES TYPE TIME OF RESPONSIBLE COMPLIANCE
IMPLEMENTATION ENTITY VERIFICATION
1. AESTHETICS
AES-1.
The exterior lighting for the proposed residences
shall be subject to the provisions of Section 17.56.030
(Outdoor Lighting for Residential Uses) of the Rancho Palos
Community
Verdes Municipal Code. Prior to the issuance of building
Prior to and during Property Owner /
Planning Review Development
permits, all residential lighting shall be fully shielded, and no
construction Applicant.
outdoor lighting shall be permitted where the light source is Department
directed toward or results in direct illumination of a parcel of
property or properties other than that upon which such light
source is physically located.
2. AIR QUALITY
AQ-1.
During construction, including grading, excavating,
Community
and land clearing, storage piles and unpaved disturbed
Property Owner /
Construction During construction Development
areas shall be continuously stabilized by being kept wet,
applicant.
treated with a chemical dust suppressant, or covered when Department
material is not being added to or removed from the pile.
AQ-2.
During construction, including grading, excavating,
Community
Property Owner /
and land clearing, sufficient water shall be applied to areas
Construction During construction Development
applicant.
disturbed to prevent emitting dust and to minimize visible
Department
emissions from crossing the boundary line.
AQ-3.
During construction, including grading, excavating,
Community
Property Owner /
and land clearing, construction vehicles leaving the site shall
Construction During construction Development
applicant.
be cleaned to prevent dust, silt, mud, and dirt from being
Department
released or tracked off site.
AQ-4.
During construction, including grading, excavating,
and land clearing, the applicant’s contractor shall be
Community
Property Owner /
responsible for minimizing bulk material or other debris from
Construction During construction Development
applicant.
being tracked onto the City’s public roadways, and if
Department
tracked, the applicant’s contractor shall be responsible for
cleaning up the impacted City’s public roadways.
AQ-5.
During construction, including grading, excavating,
and land clearing, no trucks shall be allowed to transport
excavated material off-site unless the trucks are maintained
Community
Property Owner /
such that no spillage can occur from holes or other
Construction During construction Development
applicant.
openings in cargo compartments, and loads are either:
Department
covered with tarps; wetted and loaded such that the material
does not touch the front, back, or sides of the cargo
compartment at any point less than 6" from the top and that
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Exhibit B - Page 5
Resolution No. 2017-08
MITIGATION MEASURES TYPE TIME OF RESPONSIBLE COMPLIANCE
IMPLEMENTATION ENTITY VERIFICATION
no point of the load extends above the top of the cargo
compartment.
AQ-6.
Prior to the issuance of any Grading or Building
Permits, the applicant shall demonstrate to the
Community
Community Development Director’s satisfaction that dust
Prior to Building & Safety Property Owner /
Plan Check Development
generated by grading activities shall comply with the
permit issuance applicant.
South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 Department
and the City Municipal Code requirements that require
regular watering for the control of dust.
AQ-7.
During construction, including grading, excavating,
and land clearing, all excavating and grading activities
Community
Property Owner /
shall cease when winds gusts (as instantaneous gusts)
Construction During Construction Development
applicant.
exceed 25 mph. To assure compliance with this measure,
Department
grading activities are subject to periodic inspections by
City staff.
AQ-8.
During construction,including grading, excavating,
Community
Property Owner /
and land clearing, construction equipment shall be kept in
Construction During Construction Development
applicant.
proper operating condition, including proper engine tuning
Department
and exhaust control systems.
3. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
BIO-1.
Prior to any grading or permit issuance, vegetation
needed to be cleared for fuel modification shall be offset by
the property owner using a 2:1 ratio for CSS, a0.5:1 ratio
for non-native grassland, and a 3:1 ratio for native grassland
as described in the Council-adopted NCCP for loss
occurring in an area greater than 0.3 acres by using one of
the following two methods: 1) With the approval of the City,
PVPLC, and the Wildlife Agencies, the property owner shall
dedicate additional acreage to the Palos Verdes Nature
Community
Prior to Building & Safety Property Owner /
Preserve that will add to the biological function of the
Planning Review Development
Preserve and the property owner shall provide management permit issuance applicant.
Department
funding for the additional acreage according to a Property
Analysis Record or similar method); or 2) Payment of a
mitigation fee to the City’s Habitat Restoration Fund,
pursuant to the City’s NCCP Subarea Plan. If the
revegetation option is selected, the Palos Verdes Peninsula
Land Conservancy (PVPLC) shall be hired by the City, at
the property owner’s expense, to grow and plant the
required vegetation.
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Exhibit B - Page 6
Resolution No. 2017-08
MITIGATION MEASURES TYPE TIME OF RESPONSIBLE COMPLIANCE
IMPLEMENTATION ENTITY VERIFICATION
BIO-2.
Prior to commencing construction, the
construction area shall be clearly delineated with fencing
or other boundary markers. Temporary fencing (with silt
Community
barriers) shall be installed at the limits of Project impacts
Property Owner /
Construction Prior to Construction Development
to prevent habitat impacts and prevent the spread of silt
applicant.
from the construction zone into adjacent habitats (i.e. Department
Altamira Canyon). Fencing shall be installed in a manner
that does not affect adjacent habitats to be avoided and in
compliance with Section 17.56.020.C of the RPVMC.
BIO-3.
Prior to commencing construction, a pre-grading
meeting shall occur to inform the construction contractor
Community
of the biological/jurisdictional constraints (Altamira
Property Owner /
Construction Prior to Construction Development
Canyon) of this Project. The Project limits shall be clearly
applicant.
marked on Project maps provided to the construction Department
contractor and areas outside of the Project limits shall be
designated as “no construction” zones.
BIO-4.
During construction, construction workers shall
Community
Property Owner /
strictly limit their activities, vehicles, equipment, and
Construction During Construction Development
applicant.
construction materials to the designated construction
Department
limits.
BIO-5.
During construction, all equipment maintenance,
staging, and dispensing of fuel, oil, coolant, or any other
such activities shall occur in designated areas within the
fenced Project limits. These designated areas shall be
Community
Property Owner /
located in previously compacted and disturbed areas, in
Construction During Construction Development
applicant.
such a manner to prevent runoff into adjacent areas and
Department
shall be shown on the construction plans. Fueling of
equipment shall take place on level surfaces and
contractor equipment shall be checked daily for leaks
prior to operation and repaired as necessary.
BIO-6.
During construction, the construction work zone
shall be kept as clean of debris as possible to avoid
Community
Property Owner /
attracting predators of native and sensitive wildlife. All
Construction During Construction Development
applicant.
food-related trash items shall be enclosed in sealed
Department
containers and removed daily from the construction work
zone.
BIO-7.
In order to avoid unnecessary impacts, should any
Community
Property Owner /
non-listed species be found within the property, they
Construction Prior to Construction Development
applicant.
shall be avoided and allowed to leave the Project site on
Department
their own volition, or a qualified biologist shall relocate
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Exhibit B - Page 7
Resolution No. 2017-08
MITIGATION MEASURES TYPE TIME OF RESPONSIBLE COMPLIANCE
IMPLEMENTATION ENTITY VERIFICATION
them outside of the Project site.
Community
Property Owner /
BIO-8.
Pets of Project personnel shall not be allowed on
Construction During Construction Development
applicant.
the Project site during construction.
Department
BIO-9.
Prior to any grading or building permit issuance, a
qualified biologist shall review the landscape plans to
Community
Prior to Building & Safety Property Owner /
ensure that that no invasive, non-native plant species are
Plan Check Development
permit issuance applicant.
used in any proposed landscaping. The Landscape Plan
Department
shall include a plant palette that consists of native plants
and non-invasive species.
BIO-10.
Prior to commencing construction, a Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared to
reduce the potential for accidental releases of fuel,
pesticides, and other materials. This plan shall outline
Community
Plan Check and Prior to and During Property Owner /
refueling locations, emergency response procedures, and
Development
Construction Construction applicant.
reporting requirements. During construction, equipment for
Department
immediate cleanup shall be kept at the staging area. This
plan shall also include erosion control measures to control
surface runoff, erosion, and sedimentation outside of the
project footprints.
BIO-11.
A qualified biologist shall monitor construction
during clearing, grubbing, and initial excavation activities,
as needed. The biological monitor shall ensure that, if
present, nesting birds in the Project vicinity are not
Community
Property Owner /
impacted (change in normal behaviors) and that
Construction During Construction Development
applicant.
construction workers stay within the designated footprint
Department
of the construction work zone, as delineated by fencing,
to avoid trespass on foot or in vehicles into sensitive
habitats, such as Altamira Canyon along the eastern
perimeter of the Project site.
BIO-12.
The clearance of vegetation during construction
shall occur outside of the nesting season (generally
February 1 through September 1). If avoiding the nesting
season is not practicable, the following additional
Community
Prior to and During Property Owner /
measures shall be employed:
Construction Development
Construction applicant.
Department
A pre-construction nesting survey shall be
conducted by a qualified biologist within 3 days prior to
the start of construction activities to determine whether
active nests are present within or directly adjacent to the
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Exhibit B - Page 8
Resolution No. 2017-08
MITIGATION MEASURES TYPE TIME OF RESPONSIBLE COMPLIANCE
IMPLEMENTATION ENTITY VERIFICATION
construction zone. All nests found shall be recorded.
If construction activities must occur within 300
feet of an active nest of any passerine bird or within 500
feet of an active nest of any raptor, with the exception of
an emergency, a qualified biologist shall monitor the nest
on a weekly basis, and the construction activity shall be
postponed until the biologist determines that the nest is
no longer active.
If the recommended nest avoidance zone is not
feasible, the qualified biologist shall determine whether an
exception is possible and obtain concurrence from the
resource agencies before construction work can resume
within the avoidance buffer zone. All work shall cease
within the avoidance buffer zone until either agency
concurrence is obtained or the biologist determines that
the adults and young are no longer reliant on the nest site.
4. CULTURAL RESOURCES
CUL-1.
Prior to the issuance of any grading or building
Community
permit, the applicant shall consult with the South Central
Prior to Building & Safety Property Owner /
Plan Check Development
Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) regarding any known
permit issuance applicant.
archaeological sites on or within a half-mile radius of the Department
subject property.
CUL-2.
Prior to the issuance of any grading or building
Community
Prior to Building & Safety Property Owner /
permit, the applicant shall conduct a Phase 1 archaeological
Plan Check Development
permit issuance applicant.
survey of the property for approval by the Community
Department
Development Director.
CUL-3.
Prior to the commencement of grading, the
applicant shall retain a qualified paleontologist and
archeologist to monitor grading and excavation. In the event
undetected buried cultural resources are encountered
Community
during grading and excavation, work shall be halted or
Property Owner /
Construction Prior to Construction Development
diverted from the resource area and the archeologist and/or
applicant.
paleontologist shall evaluate the remains and propose Department
appropriate mitigation measures.
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Exhibit B - Page 9
Resolution No. 2017-08
MITIGATION MEASURES TYPE TIME OF RESPONSIBLE COMPLIANCE
IMPLEMENTATION ENTITY VERIFICATION
5. GEOLOGY/SOILS
GEO-1.
Prior to issuance of any building or grading permit,
the applicant shall submit the additional information required
by the City Geologist, including a soils report, and/or a
Community
Prior to Building & Safety Property Owner /
geotechnical report, for the review and approval of the City
Plan Check Development
permit issuance applicant.
Geologist. The applicant shall comply withany
Department
requirements imposed by the City Geologist and shall
substantially repair the geologic conditions to the satisfaction
of the City Geologist.
GEO-2.
Prior to issuance of any building or grading permit,
a Hold Harmless Agreement, satisfactory to the City
Community
Attorney promising to defend, indemnify, and hold the City
Prior to Building & Safety Property Owner /
Plan Check Development
harmless from any claims or damages resulting from the
permit issuance applicant.
requested project, shall be submitted to the Community Department
Development Director for recordation with the Los Angeles
County Recorders Office.
GEO-3.
Prior to issuance of any building or grading permit,
the applicant shall submit for recordation a covenant,
satisfactory to the City Attorney, agreeing to construct the
Community
project strictly in accordance with the approved plans; and
Prior to Building & Safety Property Owner /
Plan Check Development
agreeing to prohibit further projects on the subject site
permit issuance applicant.
without first filing an application with the Director. Such Department
covenant shall be submitted to the Community Development
Director for recordation with the Los Angeles County
Recorders Office.
GEO-4.
Prior to issuance of any grading or building permit,
the applicant shall prepare an erosion control plan for the
Community
Prior to Building & Safety Property Owner /
review and approval of the Building Official. The applicant
Plan Check Development
permit issuance applicant.
shall be responsible for continuous and effective
Department
implementation of the erosion control plan during project
construction.
6. HAZARDS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Exhibit B - Page 10
Resolution No. 2017-08
MITIGATION MEASURES TYPE TIME OF RESPONSIBLE COMPLIANCE
IMPLEMENTATION ENTITY VERIFICATION
HAZ-1.
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the new
Community
single-family residences and related accessory structures
Prior to Building & Safety Property Owner /
Plan Check Development
shall be designed to incorporate all applicable fire protection
permit issuance applicant.
requirements of the City’s most recently adopted Building Department
Code, to the satisfaction of the Building Official.
7. HYDROLOGY/WATER QUALITY
HYD-1.
Prior to the issuance of a grading and/or building
permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by
the City’s Building Official an Erosion Control Plan that shall
Community
Prior to Building & Safety Property Owner /
include BMPs for erosion, sedimentation and run-off control
Plan Check Development
permit issuance applicant.
during construction activities to protect the water quality.
Department
Additionally, the Erosion Control Plan shall include post-
construction BMPs that apply to runoff from the future
buildings, including roof run-off.
HYD-2.
Prior to the issuance of a grading and/or building
permit for new construction, the applicant shall submit and
obtain approval of a Drainage Plan by the City’s Building &
Safety Division and the City’s Public Works Director finding
Community
that stormwater runoff as a result from the development of
Prior to Building & Safety Property Owner /
Plan Check Development
the subject site is designed to flow and utilize an on-site
permit issuance applicant.
drainage system that directs runoff from all buildings and Department
structures on the site shall be contained and directed to the
streets or an approved drainage course. If lot drainage
deficiencies are identified by the Public Works Director, all
such deficiencies shall be corrected by the applicant.
HYD-3.
All landscaping irrigation systems shall be part of a
Community
Prior to Building & Safety Property Owner /
water management system approved by the Public Works
Plan Check Development
permit issuance applicant.
Director. Irrigation for landscaping shall be permitted only as
Department
necessary to maintain the yard and garden.
8. NOISE
N-1.
Permitted hours and days for construction activity are
7:00 AM to 6:00 PM, Monday through Friday, 9:00AM to
Community
5:00PM on Saturday, with no construction activity permitted
Property Owner /
Construction During Construction Development
on Sundays or on the legal holidays specified in Section
applicant.
17.96.920 of the Rancho Palos Verdes Development Code. Department
During demolition, construction and/or grading operations,
trucks shall not park, queue and/or idle at the project site or
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Exhibit B - Page 11
Resolution No. 2017-08
MITIGATION MEASURES TYPE TIME OF RESPONSIBLE COMPLIANCE
IMPLEMENTATION ENTITY VERIFICATION
in the adjoining street rights-of-way before 7AM Monday
through Friday and before 9AM on Saturday, in accordance
with the permitted hours of construction stated in this
condition. When feasible to do so, the construction
contractor shall provide staging areas on-site to minimize
off-site transportation of heavy construction equipment.
These areas shall be located to maximize the distance
between staging activities and neighboring properties,
subject to approval by the building official.
Community
N-2.
The project shall utilize construction equipment
Property Owner /
Construction During Construction Development
equipped with standard noise insulating features during
applicant.
construction to reduce source noise levels.Department
N-3.
All project construction equipment shall be properly
Community
Property Owner /
maintained to assure that no additional noise, due to worn
Construction During Construction Development
applicant.
or improperly maintained parts is generated during
Department
construction.
9. UTILITIES/SERVICE SYSTEMS
UTL-1.
Pursuant to the City-approved Landslide
Moratorium Exception Permit (ZON2016-00170) issued on
August 29, 2016, prior to the issuance of any grading or
Community
building permit for the project the sewer lateral that serves
Prior to Building & Safety Property Owner /
Plan Check Development
the applicant’s property shall be inspected by the Public
permit issuance applicant.
Works Department to verify that there are no cracks, breaks Department
or leaks. If such deficiencies are present, the sewer lateral
shall be repaired or reconstructed to eliminate them prior to
any grading or building permit issuance.
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Exhibit B - Page 12
Resolution No. 2017-08