Loading...
PC RES 1988-065P.C. RESOLUTION NO. 88 - 65 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 217 AND GRADING NO. 1192 FOR AN ENCROACH- MENT INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR AN EXISTING NON -CONFORMING FENCE, GRADING IN THE FRONT YARD, A RETAINING WALL IN AN EXTREME SLOPE, AND DENYING A STRUCTURE IN THE EXTREME SLOPE LOCATED AT 6343 VILLA ROSA. WHEREAS, A.A. Osborne and E.G. Osborne have requested a Variance to allow an addition to an existing house encroaching 7 feet 6 inches into the front yard setback, a 6 foot high solid fence and existing non -conforming fencing in the front yard setback, grading in the front yard on an extreme slope and a retaining wall and garage addition in the extreme slope. WHEREAS, after notice issued pursuant to the provisions of the Rancho Palos Verdes Development Code, a public hearing was held on November 22 and December 13, 1988 at which time all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard and present evidence. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved, or to the intended use of the property whish do not apply generally to other property in the same zoning district, since the property is irregular in shape compared to other properties in the vicinity; Section 2: That such Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant, which right is possessed by other property owners under like conditions in the same zoning district since the orientation of the house on the property limits useable yard space to the yard adjacent to Villa Rosa Drive; Section 3: That the granting of such a Variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property and improvements in the area in which the property is located since the fence will not interfere with traffic visibility or views and the second story addition will conform to the existing ground floor setback; Section 4: That the granting of such a Variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the General Plan since the intent of the General Plan is to encourage high quality residential development, the proposals will enhance the property as well as adjacent properties; Section 5: That this project is categorically exempt (Class III) from therequirementsof the California Environmental Quality Act; and Section 6: For the foregoing reasons, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes hereby approves Variance No. 217 and Grading No. 1192 subject to the conditions of approval in Exhibit "A", such conditions being necessary to preserve and protect the public health, safety and welfare. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 13th day of December, 1988. ob rt Bena d, Director of En ironmental Services and Secretary to the Commission 'Lep o at2 4, . o' J./"Connolly Chair n P.C. Resolution No. 88 - 65 Page 2 EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR VARIANCE NO. 217 AND GRADING NO. 1192 1. A 4 foot high grapestake fence shall be allowed no closer than 3 feet from the retaining wall along Villa Rosa. 2. A landscape plan shall be submitted to the Director of Environmental Services for the yard area between the sidewalk and fence. 3. The retaining wall shall not exceed 3 feet 6 inches in height parallel to the driveway. 4. The retaining wall beyond the proposed addition may increase to a maximum of 5 feet in height. 5. The retaining wall shall be placed a minimum of 3 feet from the interior and rear property lines. 6. The proposed second story addition shall not be closer than 12 feet 6 inches to the front property line. 7. Approval of the reduced front setback for the second story addition is subject to approval of Height Variation No. 568. 8. The chainlink fence shall be removed within one year of this approval. 9. The applicant shall submit a letter accepting and agreeing to all of the conditions of approval of this Variance within thirty (30) days, otherwise this Variance shall be null and void. P.C. Resolution No. 88 - 65 Page 3